Why is the genial spaniard's sensational snub of Anfield supremo, Brendan Rodgers, being ignored? The Napoli-bound 'keeper states that former Reds boss Rafa Benitez is the "best manager" he ever worked with - where does that leave Rodgers? This clearly means, definitely IMO, that Reina thinks Rodgers is the worst manager he's ever work with IMO. Why else would he not mention him? Because he think he's a cunt IMO definitely. And not just a cunt - a **** cunt. The club need to defend itself from this type of craze playerpower and Ayre is the man employ to do that so Ayre should be sack IMO definitely.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pepe Reina
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Neil Young View PostYes, I realise that. And I think it has already been mentioned.
My reply to MrM's question was to try to explain why Reina has made the comment he did about leaving. He's not entirely happy (although according to Sarb he's clearly delirious about it because he has been caught smiling at least once since being told the club wanted him to leave).
It's the usual mountain out of a volehill. He's unhappy at leaving and has made a critical comment about the manner of his departure. Everyone here jumps on it and seems to feel a need to take sides, most risibly in the desire to shoot Ian Ayre seemingly because he's Ian Ayre.
Actually most of us probably feel much the same - sad to see him go, a tinge of regret that it wasn't all handled a bit better but all things must pass and it's not a tragedy for anyone really.
Unbelievable. That's almost Arnic in its stupidity.

How dare you, Neil
Was a fair comment. The pic, he was pretty chuffed to be there for someone who didn't want to be!
Comment
-
Originally posted by 5europeancups View PostHe doesn't wabnt to go to napoli, but he would go to Barca at the drop of a hat.


Do you really believe I wasn't aware of that?

.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Maybe you're someone who needs to take a deep breath Neil. Who's knows what might happen. I've just taken one and it didn't change anything but its got to be worth a try.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post


Do you really believe I wasn't aware of that?

Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 years
Comment
-
Have you ever had mixed feelings about anything? For instance, perhaps about posting your thoughts on Est?Originally posted by Sarb View Post
How dare you, Neil
Was a fair comment. The pic, he was pretty chuffed to be there for someone who didn't want to be!
I guess not. So let me give you an example: I remember smiling and laughing at my dad's wake. Obviously I was ecstatic to see him dead. QED?
Do you see my point now?.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Neil Young View PostHave you ever had mixed feelings about anything? For instance, perhaps about posting your thoughts on Est?
I guess not. So let me give you an example: I remember smiling and laughing at my dad's wake. Obviously I was ecstatic to see him dead. QED?
Do you see my point now?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kenneth View PostMaybe you're someone who needs to take a deep breath Neil. Who's knows what might happen. I've just taken one and it didn't change anything but its got to be worth a try.
Maybe.
Did you read Charlie Brooker today? It immediately made me think of here..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
That's a capital offence for James.Originally posted by Kenneth View PostThat's attempted murder
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment


Comment