Glen Johnson

[G]

Me too Bendy

[Bender]

Sorry to hear about your wife man.

Me too Bendy

Thanks best i leave this to The Library

[meffin]

We give him grief when he's ****, but to be fair to him, he had the vision to see the quick free kick for the 1st goal.

He's clearly our best RB, although he wasn't particularly great yesterday. I'd give him a new contract

[Kenneth]

He was ****e. He's not our best right back and there is no way he should get another big pay day from us.

[Rich]

Thought he was one of our better players yesterday but still only a 7/10 performance - we had far too many 5/10s out there.

I don't think he provides particularly good value for money on his £100k+ per week deal - if Flanagan recovers from his injury well then I wouldn't be too bothered to see the back of Johnson. Manquillo and Flanagan can both do well at RB. Might also be worth giving Ryan McLaughlin a go this season, he's 20 now so it's now or never for him at LFC.

[Tee]

He was ****e. He's not our best right back and there is no way he should get another big pay day from us.

[meffin]

He was ****e. He's not our best right back and there is no way he should get another big pay day from us.

He was ****e, but so was everybody else- he was slightly better than most. But without him, we wouldn't have scored the 1st goal

I agree that he needs to agree to a pay cut, but i'd keep hold of him

[RedReet]

He was ****e, but so was everybody else- he was slightly better than most. But without him, we wouldn't have scored the 1st goal

I agree that he needs to agree to a pay cut, but i'd keep hold of him

Prevented a likely goal and vital in scoring another. Important contribution.

For whatever reason, we also seem more likely to win with Glen in the team than without. I'd be curious to check the stats.

[Kenneth]

Prevented a likely goal and vital in scoring another. Important contribution.

For whatever reason, we also seem more likely to win with Glen in the team than without. I'd be curious to check the stats.

By going studs up into the attackers stomach Would have been sent off if the ref had a view of it.

[BigChief]

By going studs up into the attackers stomach Would have been sent off if the ref had a view of it.

He was trying to reach for a ball while clearing it high to avoid a deflection back into the net. Completely mistimed it but it wasn't malicious. Still a foul though.

And one I'm grateful for.

[RedReet]

By going studs up into the attackers stomach Would have been sent off if the ref had a view of it.

Did the job.

Needed to be there to clear in the first place and he was.

[Kenneth]

He has a body and it was in the right place. I'll concede that.

[danperkins]

He was pretty awful. Serious tackle that was

[Scratch]

Studs up and high?? The opponent was almost lying on the ground when Glen hit him and he only caught him after he'd contacted the ball, and even then it was more falling impact then booting him...not one QPR player appealed for the penalty, and I don't think the ref would have given one if he had of seen it.

Anyone got a gif?

[meffin]

Studs up and high?? The opponent was almost lying on the ground when Glen hit him and he only caught him after he'd contacted the ball, and even then it was more falling impact then booting him...not one QPR player appealed for the penalty, and I don't think the ref would have given one if he had of seen it.

Anyone got a gif?

You sure?