Manchester City

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Harv
    Randy Marsh
    • Jul 2006
    • 26280

    #6226
    Originally posted by Shaggy
    It was a pretty bold call of his to pick us given how dominant they were at the time and how....flaky we were. Took balls that, going there would've been a piss easy decision. He's a smart guy and I guess no one can resist Jurgen once you've been exposed to his charms.
    And a lovely outing to Blackpool. Fish and Chips and a ride on the Ferris wheel. How could anyone say no?
    "When a man insults my country I insult him, by taking his woman" Tony Yeboah

    "looking through your posts since 2007 and what you have consistently written about my football team I have come to the conclusion that if you had 1 more brain cell you would be a plant .. your father was a hamster and your mother smells of elder berries, I fart in your general direction ..." Nicey

    Comment

    • Buzzo
      Donald Buzzworth
      • Jun 2010
      • 67435

      #6227
      Originally posted by labourRed
      Wouldn't they have paid £65m or less. We paid a tappng up tax, if i can remember correctly.
      I don’t remember exactly, but they dropped out, mainly because Virgil had made his mind up. We had to pay what we had to pay, but City were never a consideration, it didn’t come down to money, because did it did - Virgil would be at Coty earning more money.
      Modifying post.

      Comment

      • craigdanny
        Souness
        • Nov 2016
        • 4

        #6228
        £450m now spent by Pep on the back four alone since his arrival.

        Comment

        • Charly
          Paisley
          • Jul 2008
          • 10372

          #6229
          I think that is inflated slightly. It was 300 or 345m yesterday.
          In the beginning, Fowler created the Heaven and the Earth.

          Comment

          • fabinho
            Fagan
            • Jun 2018
            • 1557

            #6230
            John Stones - £50.04m
            * Douglas Luiz - £10.80m
            * Danilo - £27.00m
            * Kyle Walker - £47.43m
            * Benjamin Mendy - £51.75m
            * Aymeric Laporte - £58.50m
            * Pedro Porro - £10.80m
            * Angeliño - £10.80m
            * João Cancelo - £58.50m
            * Rodri - £63.00m
            * Nathan Aké - £40.77m
            * Ruben Dias - £55.00m
            Glass half empty club

            Comment

            • Pablo
              Anti-Antipodeanite
              • May 2007
              • 25808

              #6231
              Originally posted by craigdanny
              £450m now spent by Pep on the back four alone since his arrival.
              It's mental, and they're a mess still.

              CBs
              Laporte - Brilliant
              Ake - Unproven but has potential
              Dias - Unproven but has potential
              Stones - Poor
              Garcia - Poor and wants to leave
              Otamendi - Liability

              Fullbacks
              Walker - Been a good player for them but 30 already
              Mendy - Good at social media, not so good at football
              Zinchenko - Decent offensively, suspect defensively
              Cancelo - Decent offensively, suspect defensively
              Angelino - So bad they loaned him out

              Not much value for half a billion really

              A lot of pressure on Ake and Dias to be an instant hit.

              Comment

              • RedReet
                Fantasy Football Champion
                • Dec 2006
                • 25265

                #6232
                What a shame Harry Maguire didn't make the list.

                He certainly meets the criteria anyway.
                If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?

                Comment

                • fabinho
                  Fagan
                  • Jun 2018
                  • 1557

                  #6233
                  Such a pity Otamendi is leaving.
                  Glass half empty club

                  Comment

                  • ntto
                    Dalglish
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 2965

                    #6234
                    watched MoTD2 and Pep said how Leicester didnt come to play and they just sat back on the counter - from what they showed on MoTD2 Leicester played some brilliant football and teh edit made them look very dominant

                    Comment

                    • dom9
                      Ant Pisser
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 69013

                      #6235
                      Originally posted by ntto
                      watched MoTD2 and Pep said how Leicester didnt come to play and they just sat back on the counter - from what they showed on MoTD2 Leicester played some brilliant football and teh edit made them look very dominant
                      I watched that, and to me at least, it seemed that what Jermaine Jenas (or was it the other one?) was saying, and what they were showing us didn't quite tally.

                      It looked to me like Leicester effectively absorbed the pressure then pounced (and scored).

                      They did play some pretty neat stuff though under pressure.
                      Oh I don't know.

                      Comment

                      • rudedog
                        Pig hater
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 9911

                        #6236
                        Leicester had 28% possession, and 7 shots on goal - to get 5 goals from that is pretty hard to believe. One of the biggest 'smash and grabs' ever surely?

                        Comment

                        • Buzzo
                          Donald Buzzworth
                          • Jun 2010
                          • 67435

                          #6237
                          They weren't under the cosh though at the end, once they went 2-1 up they were pretty comfortable.

                          The penalties were hard to disagree with.
                          Modifying post.

                          Comment

                          • spud_gun
                            Paisley
                            • Jul 2006
                            • 26519

                            #6238
                            Don't think you can class scoring 5 goals as a smash n' grab.

                            Man City only had 5 shots on target all game. Given the possession (72%) they had and shots (16) that's bordering on criminal.

                            Comment

                            • Pablo
                              Anti-Antipodeanite
                              • May 2007
                              • 25808

                              #6239
                              Originally posted by rudedog
                              Leicester had 28% possession, and 7 shots on goal - to get 5 goals from that is pretty hard to believe. One of the biggest 'smash and grabs' ever surely?
                              It definitely wasn't a "smash and grab". For the 37 minutes up until the Leicester pen City were definitely on top. Dominant in possession but not creating much.

                              Leicester had a predictable tactic of sitting deep and hitting on the counter attack. Getting the equaliser seemed to give them confidence and drain the confidence from City.

                              After that I think Leicester were deserved winners. City couldn't break them down and Leicester picked them off when they had the chance.

                              The scoreline probably did flatter Leicester, but it was a well earned tactical victory IMO.

                              Comment

                              • RedReet
                                Fantasy Football Champion
                                • Dec 2006
                                • 25265

                                #6240
                                City's front 3 were completely ineffective, bar that one strike from Mahrez. Sterling and Foden barely touched the ball in their revised roles.

                                KDB was City's only performer, but he had nobody to hit.

                                Smash and grab is a bit of an injustice to Leicester.
                                If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?

                                Comment

                                Working...