Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Racism in Football

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Cool. Should be interesting.
    Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

    Comment


      Originally posted by Kenneth View Post
      Cool. Should be interesting.
      Yes, +1.

      Comment


        Originally posted by ChesterDave View Post
        Terry's legal team to consider using bad character defence against AF. Some comment caught on tape apparently. Very big can of worms to risk opening
        cannot wait to see how AF's legal team put together and show JT's previously bad character. hope he gets hammered.
        removing all the weak links makes us stronger

        too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

        Comment


          THE barrister defending Chelsea captain John Terry over a criminal racism charge might make a bad character application against Anton Ferdinand, his alleged victim, a court heard today.

          Terry, 31, will stand trial at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London on July 9 accused of a racially-aggravated public order offence - shouting an offensive comment at Ferdinand.

          The comment was allegedly made, and seemingly caught on footage, to the Queens Park Rangers defender when the two teams met during a Premier League match in October.

          Today, during an administrative hearing ahead of the trial, Terry's barrister, George Carter-Stephenson QC, said he was considering making a bad character application against Ferdinand.

          According to the Crown Prosecution Service, bad character "means the commission of an offence or other reprehensible conduct", and is used to cast doubt on a witness's evidence.

          Mr Carter-Stephenson said: "There is likely to be an application for bad character against Mr Ferdinand about two incidents."

          No details were given about the incidents.

          However, the barrister added: "There is pertinent evidence which we believe will assist the court."

          The Chelsea star did not attend today's hearing after playing for England last night in their quarter-final defeat to Italy at Euro 2012.

          He denies the offence.

          The court heard that both the prosecution and defence have commissioned experts to study the CCTV footage of the defender allegedly making the comment.

          The experts are due to meet this week to discuss their findings and iron out any issues, two of which, the court heard, were pronunciation and body language.

          District Judge Howard Riddle said he wanted a single report taking in both opinions.

          In private, the court also discussed security arrangements for the trial, which is expected to last five days.

          - John Fahey

          That rug really tied the room together.

          Comment


            Dupe post
            Last edited by Liverpel; 25-06-12, 02:12 PM. Reason: Dupe
            That rug really tied the room together.

            Comment


              This should get interesting...
              The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
                This should get interesting...


                John Terry calling in someone to give AF a bad character reference is surely a bit of a contradiction.

                The cheek of the *******. He has no shame. ****ing poison that bloke.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Lee View Post


                  John Terry calling in someone to give AF a bad character reference is surely a bit of a contradiction.

                  The cheek of the *******. He has no shame. ****ing poison that bloke.


                  Hopefully they will turn around and list the examples of Terry's bad character as well which could drag things out a bit
                  The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

                  Comment


                    I read that as he is pretty bang to rights, so needs to find an avenue of getting out of the conviction.


                    Edit: 5 Days!
                    *Except Michael, who died.

                    Comment


                      9th July it starts and there is not a sniff in any of the papers. The amount of column inches Suarez got it ****s me off hence the bump . Hope the ****er does time. If a man gets banned from any football match for 4 years for doing the ******s sign because it could entice violence this cunt should never play again.
                      Go **** yourself

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Boogar View Post
                        9th July it starts and there is not a sniff in any of the papers. The amount of column inches Suarez got it ****s me off hence the bump . Hope the ****er does time. If a man gets banned from any football match for 4 years for doing the ******s sign because it could entice violence this cunt should never play again.

                        Cut his head off!!
                        "Justice has been done."

                        Comment


                          Think I read the maximum punishment he can receive is a £2k fine.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by ashey View Post
                            Think I read the maximum punishment he can receive is a £2k fine.
                            more than the court costs I presume. Cunt will probably get legal aid too

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Boogar View Post
                              9th July it starts and there is not a sniff in any of the papers. The amount of column inches Suarez got it ****s me off hence the bump .
                              It's sub judice, that's why.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                Trial tomorrow then?
                                Oh I don't know.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X