Originally posted by Alex
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Racism in Football
Collapse
X
-
It's a higher burden of proof required in a court of law, even if someone is found not guilty in a court of law the matter can still be pursued in a court of law, in this case the FA hearing would be similar to a civil court. If the FA do nothing it would be a joke, whatever happens in the court of law.The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
-
Originally posted by doogle View Postor if he is found guilty they say he's already been done by the court so they can't/won't do anything and if he's found not guilty then they say he's not guilty and no punishmentOriginally posted by rcasemore View PostBingoOriginally posted by Tee View PostWin win situation for the FA.
What is any of this based on though? I dont think there has ever been a case of someone being found guilty and then getting off Scot free from a footballing point of view.Originally posted by MrNice View PostDisgraceful......absolutely disgraceful ... in plain view of everybody as well ... The corrupt world we live in
If it happens on the pitch and he gets found guilty then the FA have to ban him. Regardless of who he is.*Except Michael, who died.
Comment
-
No, they don't have to ban him at all. They could quite easily play the card he's already been punished in court and as it's been dealt within a court of law the FA have no right or need to interfere - or something like that.
Don't forget which organisation we're talking about here with the FA, ask yourself this question why was the trial held this far after the offence?
Comment
-
Rubbish, the trial is this far back because thats how slow the legal system works in this country.
Name me one line of work when you wont get punished by an employer/regulator if a criminal act was committed whist doing a job. There is none.
It just smacks of us being jaded with the FA to think that he wont.*Except Michael, who died.
Comment
-
Rubbish, it was put back conviently to start just after the Euros & I don't believe it was for any other reason that that.
Of course I am utterly jaded by the FA, and I do expect them to use the outcome of the courts to decide which action if any to take i.e. not guilty - no punishment and if guilty either no action due to him being punished in the courts already OR a low level ban - there has been a precident set with Suarez in terms of the length of ban, if he is found guilty in court I'd expect at least as long and to be honest a longer ban due to it beng from the courts; I'd be shocked if this is the case in reality.
Comment
-
Alleged to have called Ferdinand a 'black cunt'. Alleged video footage here.Originally posted by TheElephantMan View PostCan someone please remind me, what is John Terry alleged to have said and/or done? Is there conclusive proof of his guilt?
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfoaoQImtaI"]JOHN TERRY & ANTON FERDINAND QPR 1 CHELSEA 0 ALLEGED RACIST INCIDENT - YouTube[/ame]
Comment
-
I think its pretty routine to have a court hearing delayed with a good reason. I guess we will all find out what they plan on doing if guilty in a few weeks.Originally posted by rcasemore View PostRubbish, it was put back conviently to start just after the Euros & I don't believe it was for any other reason that that.
Of course I am utterly jaded by the FA, and I do expect them to use the outcome of the courts to decide which action if any to take i.e. not guilty - no punishment and if guilty either no action due to him being punished in the courts already OR a low level ban - there has been a precident set with Suarez in terms of the length of ban, if he is found guilty in court I'd expect at least as long and to be honest a longer ban due to it beng from the courts; I'd be shocked if this is the case in reality.
I cant really see more than an 8 game ban though. If thats what was set with Suarez, then they cant really increase/decrease as they want.*Except Michael, who died.
Comment
-
Thanks. Not sure if that's exactly what he said, but then again I don't speak cockney.Originally posted by Phoenix06 View PostAlleged to have called Ferdinand a 'black cunt'. Alleged video footage here.
JOHN TERRY & ANTON FERDINAND QPR 1 CHELSEA 0 ALLEGED RACIST INCIDENT - YouTube
Comment
-
I've never thought it was conclusive myself.Originally posted by TheElephantMan View PostThanks. Not sure if that's exactly what he said, but then again I don't speak cockney.
What stinks is that there is no footage whatsoever of Suarez saying what he was alleged to have said. If they strung him out on the basis of Evras word then they should do the same to Terry based on Ferdinands.
"Justice" only applies to foreigners. Respect the ref bollocks with Mascher and this ****e with Suarez.
Comment
-
Er, Suarez was not charged with a criminal offence.Originally posted by tsb View PostI've never thought it was conclusive myself.
What stinks is that there is no footage whatsoever of Suarez saying what he was alleged to have said. If they strung him out on the basis of Evras word then they should do the same to Terry based on Ferdinands.
"Justice" only applies to foreigners. Respect the ref bollocks with Mascher and this ****e with Suarez.
It's really not that hard to understand.
Oh I don't know.
Comment
-
I doubt he'll be found guilty tbh. But it will be interesting to see if the FA persue it with their lower standard of proof. If there is testimony from players then it would seem pretty similar to the Suarez case, but without the language ambiguity.Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 years
Comment
-
They, have managed to play this out down specific channels which allowed him to play for the rest of the season, play in the euros, most likely exit out of Chelsea, and drag it out till after the Olympics when after all is said and done, the Press have long lost there Moral Appetite to change the world make it a better ****ing place for you and for me and the ...entire bunch of cunts human race ...Originally posted by Alex View PostWhat is any of this based on though? I dont think there has ever been a case of someone being found guilty and then getting off Scot free from a footballing point of view.
If it happens on the pitch and he gets found guilty then the FA have to ban him. Regardless of who he is.
I just think the sheer ****ing cultural hypocrisy of it all .... I will happily stand corrected if suddenly the ****ing press in the UK suddenly find there collective bollix and do there jobs .. but I am not holding my breath ...
He will go out the back door with a smack on the wrist, were as the Uruguayan for about 4 weeks was right up there with ****ing Stalin for saying something which does not have the same negative meaning in his ****ing launage ...
I am remembering how ****ing angry this made me the first time around ..... people dont give two flying monkeys about racism ... really when you get down to itAnybody who criticizes Klopp ever is a James Blunt. Nov 2015
#****CITY
Comment
Comment