Originally posted by Neil Young
View Post
-
It helps to pay for Wembley.Oh I don't know. -
Apparently these fines get filtered down to grassroots (I hate that word) level to improve lower league standards and facilities. How true that is I don't know.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
Bernstein said earlier that Cole did it in the heat of the moment. So he picked up his phone, typed out a tweet and clicked 'send' in the heat of the moment. Get a grip.
Comment
-
Thanks. I certainly don't believe it. I mean, is that in addition to budgeted spending? How do they allocate it fairly then?Originally posted by Lee View Post
Yes, of course. That's ok then.Originally posted by Lee View PostBernstein said earlier that Cole did it in the heat of the moment. So he picked up his phone, typed out a tweet and clicked 'send' in the heat of the moment. Get a grip.
The FA are a f*cking joke..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
No idea, probably because it's bollocks.Originally posted by Neil Young View PostThanks. I certainly don't believe it. I mean, is that in addition to budgeted spending? How do they allocate it fairly then?
Bernstein was on Talksport (I know) last week talking to Keyes and Gray. They asked him where the fines go and he hastily said that they get filtered down to grassroots football, he then quickly moved onto the next question. So I think it's safe to say that it goes to the FA's Christmas party.
Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
Comment
-
Has Piara Power said anything about the Terry case yet?The times they are a changin'.Comment
-
Not seen anything, but FARE did put an article on the website within 24 hours.Football without Origi is nothingComment
-
Good pic this to be fair
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
Is Wills asking "is one a choc ice?"Comment
-
Interesting views from Lord Triesman:
He said: "I couldn't understand why the sanction was different for a Liverpool player and for John Terry."
"It may be when you look at all the detail they thought there were reasons for [it]. I can't see it."
"The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
-- William BlakeComment
-
Ashley Cole doing an Illuminati handshake there with his soon to be Reptilian King.Originally posted by Shaggy View PostComment
-
Originally posted by dww View Post
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.Comment
-
Yeah just read that on the BBC site. It's great that he's questioning the FA's competency.
Hello mert.Comment
-
He said much the same days ago in one of the papers.Originally posted by dww View Post
He also praised Bruce Buck then and the way Chelsea handled it, contrasting it sharply with LFC's behaviour, and suggesting that the difference may explain the difference in the bans for the two players. Maybe he's friends with Buck or maybe it's a genuine comment but either way it's interesting that a former head of the FA thinks it's feasible that Suárez got a longer ban because of the way his club handled the PR.
Hardly the highest judicial standards.Last edited by Neil Young; 10-10-12, 08:04 PM..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Suarez got his ban before our PR disaster though.*Except Michael, who died.Comment
-
No he didn't. All the T-shirts etc.
Or are you making a joke about the embarrassing documentary? The one that Brendan Rodgers "should have refused to take part in"#bogbrushhairtosser..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
Comment