Originally posted by Vermilion
View Post
I further believe that the clause was something to do with how the amount set was paid to Dnipro
EG there is a £15 million clause but it all has to be paid upfront
If you meet all the conditions of any clause the owner would have to sell otherwise the player could sue for breach of contract and probably gain release and be a free agent
My guess is we bid £15 million but wanted to structure the payments and this is why the owner didn't sign the papers
Then we leak to the press we met the clause (which is partly true) and that the nasty owner was the problem (partly true again) and that we did everything we could to push the deal through (partly true again)
Oh well on to the next target
I must say I'm concerned how we have operated the last 2 windows. I think the scouts / committee / Brendan appear to have done a decent job in targeting specific players but executing those plans we have fallen short for whatever reasons
Comment