Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Personally, I would argue that half a ****ing season constitutes rather more than a "spell".
In my opinion, 19 games WITHOUT ONE GOAL is a ****ing calamity.
And if I see one more divvy work out his goal/ game ratio for the second half of the season "if you ignore his first little dry spell", I will SCREAM.
Why? Because it's a valid argument against your hate campaign? h:
Crouchy is a good player. Not good enough for Liverpool FC.
He needs to do some work on getting power into his headers and improve his all round finishing as well. Yes, that and scoring more than 8% of the chances presented to him.
What i like about him is his hold up play. It's the only thing there is to admire.
Unlike Emile "head the ball anywhere" Heskey, Crouchy finds a Red shirt 90% of the time. His heading is fcukin atrocious.
He has planty of skill for a big man though. And what? Pity he doesn't have any 'put-ball-in-net-skills'
But yes, i think we need a big, strong centre forward who has ALL the attributes in question. We do.
Kuyt IMO, is not the answer but i could well be wrong. I like kuyt.
Diouf played about twice as a striker.
Heskey is debatable.
Saunders...hmm, seem to recall he scored goals.
Point taken about Diouf, but he was bought as a striker and played enough games as a striker to demonstrate how utterly useless he was there.
Heskey could have been good had he built on his first season, but he didn't and his performances for the next three or four years were diabolical - far far worse than anything Crouch has served up.
Saunders was absolutely ****ing ****e.
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’
Comment