Just think how much we'll have to listen to them if we win.
That will get tiresome.
That will get tiresome.
-
Oh I don't know. -
Oh give it a rest
What does anyone on here care whether or not how much these yanks spend on a player?!
I care not. If Hicks and Gillet spout off saying they'll pay for any player, and end up paying 10% more than they should, i dont give a f*ck.
They're astute businessmen, they know what they're doing
All I care about is Rafa getting the players he needs for us to win the premiership next season
2007 - Champions League Winners
2008 - Premiership ChampionsI saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought "what did you expect?"
There's no water round here stupid, should have stayed where it was wetComment
-
-
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Click HERE to watch the interviewOriginally posted by mick the click View PostOn SSN, when asked how they intend to take Liverpool forward, George got a wad of $$$ and Euros out and stuck them in the pocket of his jacket 'I expect there'll be some of this.....' he said.
Comment
-
I know it was done in a joking way, but it still did not feel like the Liverpool way to do things.Comment
-
Exactly, daft.Originally posted by AFII View PostFirst people are moaning because the club doesn't say anything and now when they say a lot then people are moaning
Forwards.......Comment
-
Maybe they're different people, hmmm?Originally posted by DannyMan2006 View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
To ease anyone's mind on this subject....
GG and TH are NOT high profile owners. they do not meddle in day to day operations of their clubs over here in North America (I am a massive Canadiens fan as well) and when they took over the other clubs, it was a novelty in the press for half a season, and then they're gone. They are very upbeat, positive people with great minds for business when it comes to sprting franchises, and not for a "pump and dump" scenario, they truly do have passion in who they own, and feel it's a personal reflection on their business reputations if their teams fail.
After the transfer windows, I doubt you'll hear much more than you do about any other owners. Except for the fact that they are American owners in an English sport of course. The UK press seems to gobble them up moer than normal. Don't go making comaparisons to Glazier either, because he bought for the sake of owning, not for the passion and pride.Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings.Comment
-
You think Gillett and Hicks bought Liverpool for "passion and pride"?
When did the Texas Rangers last make the post-season?
The new owners may or may not prove to be good owners for Liverpool but it's far too early to tell anything much except they are at least very good at handling the media. All the same I think it would be naive to assume that their interests are identical to ours..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
True but considering the fact they have to put money in to buy a stadium the least we can say is that they see the club as a long term investment. To make that work they need to improve the squad now to insure continued on pitch sucess to keep revenues high in the coming seasons. I suspect this means that in the short term at least they will pretty much mirror the desires of the supporters.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
I would also say that for all the doom and gloom around the Glazers takeover of United they did make cash available for transfers."The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
-- William BlakeComment
-
I wouldn't dispute any of that.Originally posted by dww View Post
All this agreeing is getting tiring..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
Comment