Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My God this is what it has come down to - absolutely heartbreaking!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    My God this is what it has come down to - absolutely heartbreaking!

    By: The Financier
    Date: 14 February 2008
    Chelsea have joined the top five richest clubs on the globe according to Deloitte’s annual financial review of football clubs around the world. They join Real Madrid, Manchester Utd, Arsenal and Barcelona. However, a report in The Independent newspaper (14/02/08) has labelled Liverpool’s status in the rich list as “relative tiddlers”.

    The Merseyside club earned some £133.9m for 2006-07 while Chelsea’s income was put at £190.5m for the same period. However, using a system that compares ‘like-for-like’, the figures for the top five are as follows;

    £236.2m - Real Madrid
    £212.1m - Manchester Utd
    £195.3m - Barcelona
    £177.6m - Chelsea / Arsenal

    Chelsea’s income for the accounting period saw an increase of 28% which will offset the club’s losses – a figure that has come down year-on-year for the past three years.

    The figures read;

    2003-04 - £ 87.8m
    2004-05 - £140m
    2005-06 - £ 80.2m

    Nick Harris report for The Independent goes on to say, “The data does not inspire Liverpool's hopes of challenging United, Chelsea or Arsenal any time soon. It also highlights the massive gamble Hicks and Gillett have taken in borrowing £350m. Without Champions' League income (£25m-plus), Liverpool would be losing large sums, something Hicks and Gillett cannot sustain.”

    Harris also predicts that, with the new television deal money to be counted in the Deloitte reports for next season, clubs like Manchester Utd will be challenging Madrid for the title of the world’s richest side, with both Chelsea and Arsenal in hot-pursuit.

    #2
    It's about trophies.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by fredo View Post
      It's about trophies.
      Hmmm, if that were purely the case, how come Arsenal are ahead of us

      I think it's all pretty obvious who's fault this is - SACK PARRY

      Comment


        #4
        I can't figure out how Chelsea would earn more than us in a season.........What about our global fanbase, merchandising etc etc
        Dare we believe

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by blacky View Post
          I can't figure out how Chelsea would earn more than us in a season.........What about our global fanbase, merchandising etc etc
          ask parry

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by blacky View Post
            I can't figure out how Chelsea would earn more than us in a season.........What about our global fanbase, merchandising etc etc
            Well it will only get worse if loads of our fans refuse to buy our merchandise......

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by blacky View Post
              I can't figure out how Chelsea would earn more than us in a season.........What about our global fanbase, merchandising etc etc
              Same here. I don't get it.
              Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

              Comment


                #8
                But aren't Chelsea reporting massive operating debts each year? Obviously when the owner has deep pockets it doesn't matter too much, but aren't they trying to get away from relying on Roman's money to run the club by a certain year?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by gaynerleo View Post
                  However, using a system that compares ‘like-for-like’, the figures for the top five are as follows;

                  £236.2m - Real Madrid
                  £212.1m - Manchester Utd
                  £195.3m - Barcelona
                  £177.6m - Chelsea / Arsenal
                  What kind of "system" is this? Like-for-like, my ass. Income is income and expenditure is expenditure. Surely?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by blacky View Post
                    I can't figure out how Chelsea would earn more than us in a season.........What about our global fanbase, merchandising etc etc
                    What merchandising? Most people agree it is pretty pathetic.
                    Oh I don't know.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by fredo View Post
                      It's about trophies.
                      It is about trophies and also how we are perceived around the globe. When we won number 5 in 2005, reportedly we had 28 million supporters world wide. If we had a bigger stadium to accommodate more of them and more shops around the globe they would buy more merchandise. The truth is, we are not maximising our potential by a very long way, in fact we are not even trying. Smaller clubs with half our fan base are doing it better.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        If you look at the matchday earnings figures you can really see where our problem lies.

                        £92.5m - MU
                        £90.6m - Arsenal
                        £74.5m - Chelsea
                        £38.4m - Liverpool

                        we're bringing in a fraction of what the others are. How people can still expect us to be competing with them after looking at these figures is beyond me. We're in the same bracket as the likes of Everton rather than these top 3 teams. Just shows how much we really need that new stadium and how much all this dithering over it has cost us.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso View Post
                          Same here. I don't get it.
                          £50 a ticket, tourists in the club shop, and more merchandise in the shops abroad.
                          Like blood on iron

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
                            £50 a ticket, tourists in the club shop, and more merchandise in the shops abroad.
                            And a big sponsorship deal with Samsung.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
                              £50 a ticket, tourists in the club shop, and more merchandise in the shops abroad.
                              I'm aware of these things - especially the pricier tickets and (I assume) better marketing abroad - but surely the impact isn't as great as the discrepancy in those figures?!?

                              I mean, for a start, they get on average about 6000 fewer through the gates than we do, which would nullify at least some of the margin in gate receipts.
                              Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X