Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hughes: Cruz is better than Torres

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Originally posted by Nic83 View Post
    This is hilarious, I'm still wondering how Hughes' statement above has turned into an off the field merchandising argument, this forum is great
    Absolutely incredible, I agree.

    Comment


      #47
      Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
      Nic, are you glad we signed Torres at his price, or would you prefer we'd signed Cruz for his smaller fee? Simple question.

      That's irrelevant, we are a far superior team and Cruz isn't good enough for us so it can't be answered

      Comment


        #48
        Originally posted by the rev leeroy brown View Post
        at their respective fees, who do you think blackburn would have preferered to sign though?
        Originally posted by Skillz View Post
        Torres.
        bollocks!!!
        People who think there's no good way to die have obviously never heard the phrase 'Drug-fuelled-sex-heart-attack'.

        Comment


          #49
          Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
          As I said before, he's better value for them, Torres is better value for us.
          :baffled:

          That statement might be good if you substituted the word value for something else

          Comment


            #50
            Originally posted by Nic83 View Post
            That's irrelevant, we are a far superior team and Cruz isn't good enough for us so it can't be answered
            So it would not have been good value to but him at 3.5 mil then?

            Comment


              #51
              Originally posted by Nic83 View Post
              That's irrelevant, we are a far superior team and Cruz isn't good enough for us so it can't be answered


              You do make me laugh.
              Nah. He won't win the Prem. You can quote me on that. - Sarb24

              Comment


                #52
                Originally posted by Skillz View Post
                Torres.

                So you think they'd have liked to buy Torres andmost probably put themselves in debt and have had no money at all for any other players?

                I think they'd have preffered to buy a top striker for pittence who wasn't Torres even though he's not AS good as Torres, while keeping the club's finances in the positive and also having money for other signings. Maybe I'm wrong though.
                Last edited by Nic83; 12-04-08, 03:17 PM.

                Comment


                  #53
                  Originally posted by Alan Key View Post
                  Absolutely incredible, I agree.

                  What do you mean incredible? ARE you DJ Syd!

                  Comment


                    #54
                    Originally posted by Angry Dan View Post
                    So it would not have been good value to but him at 3.5 mil then?
                    I'll "but" him if he scores tomorrow!

                    Comment


                      #55
                      Originally posted by Nic83 View Post
                      So you think they'd have liked to buy Torres andmost probably put themselves in debt and have had no money at all for any other players?

                      I think they'd have preffered to buy a top striker for pittence who wasn't Torres even though he's not AS good as Torres, while keeping the club's finances in the positive and also having money for other signings. Maybe I'm wrong though.
                      I'm not privy to their finances but if they were offered the option of signing
                      those 2 players at the price and they could afford Torres, they would buy him. Without doubt and that is before what he has done this year.

                      Problem is here, Torres wouldn't have heard of Blackburn.
                      Nah. He won't win the Prem. You can quote me on that. - Sarb24

                      Comment


                        #56
                        Who gives a sh*t?
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment


                          #57
                          Originally posted by Nic83 View Post
                          You are Wrong IMO. Torres scores 3/2 times the goals cruz has yet Torres cost about 6/1 times the money.
                          What does that mean?

                          Comment


                            #58
                            i'd happily add cruz to our team in the transfer window if he was available. obviously not in torres league but would compliment him really well and already have had ayear in the premiership.

                            Comment


                              #59
                              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                              Who gives a sh*t?
                              Nic83 I assume.
                              "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                              -- William Blake

                              Comment


                                #60
                                I wonder if he is any good in goal

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X