Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
I'm not suicidal at our home form, it's a concern but i'm still subscribing to the "we're miles better than most sides who come to anfield so we'll improve it soon enough".
The points in your list however, come across (to me at least) as an example of the kind of mentality that has contributed to this club not contesting the title in nearly 20 years. It's the whole "3rd is pretty good" attitude which has evolved throughout the club over the past 15-20 years and has IMO meant that we've taken on the role of 'brave losers' rather than ruthless winners.
I'm not having a go at you so please dont take this as any kind of personal attack. I just think that whole train of thought, whereby we're saying it's ok not to win or challenge for the title, because we're doing a bit better than our recent failed campaigns, is characteristic of small clubs and those who subscribe to the "it's not the winning that counts, it's the taking part" theory.
Man Utd and Chelsea (in recent years) have a winning mentality, one which tells them that if you win it, you've succeeded and if you dont, you're a failure. One which resents the notion of seeing a 3rd or 4th place finish as 'successful' or even satisfactory.
The only way we'll win the title is by being strict and harsh on ourselves because as soon as you accept the position of also-ran, you cease to participate in the title race.
But I'm not at the club.
All I can do is support the team when I'm at matches and blather on in internet forums about the things I see as important (like retaining a manager who is making progress). Obviously if the team or management approached football in the way I do there'd be a problem but, under this manager at least, they don't so there isn't.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
It's good that you can do that, it's probably healthier and if i could do the same, i would do. But it's just foreign to me, i cant imagine being able to do that.
Well, I couldn't when I was younger. I've said it before and I'll say it again - it really is only football.
And to anybody who wants to quote back at me Shanks's comment about football being more important than life I say either he was joking/exaggerating for comic effect or he was wrong.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Well, I couldn't when I was younger. I've said it before and I'll say it again - it really is only football.
And to anybody who wants to quote back at me Shanks's comment about football being more important than life I say either he was joking/exaggerating for comic effect or he was wrong.
Agreed. More important things in life than football
All I can do is support the team when I'm at matches and blather on in internet forums about the things I see as important (like retaining a manager who is making progress). Obviously if the team or management approached football in the way I do there'd be a problem but, under this manager at least, they don't so there isn't.
I'm not saying you're at the club and i wasnt blaming you for it either.
I just identified a link between that kind of mentality, and what stops us winning the title. I think the feeling of the fans does rub off onto the mentality of those at the club, in a slow and subtle way.
I'm not saying you're at the club and i wasnt blaming you for it either.
I just identified a link between that kind of mentality, and what stops us winning the title. I think the feeling of the fans does rub off onto the mentality of those at the club, in a slow and subtle way.
I wasn't taking offence so don't worry about that.
I really don't agree that what I think affects the mentality at the club. I understand why it might be nice to believe we do but I think we're kidding ourselves. For example, if Rafa hasn't prioritised the title before then it's not because we think it's OK but because he has calculated other things are a better bet, notwithstanding the fans' disappointment.
The only time the fans really affect what happens at the club is when they destabilize it by booing players or the manager, conjuring up a poisonous atmosphere of dissatisfaction on phone-ins, forums, etc. and, most of all of course and much more constructively, by shouting and singing ourselves hoarse at matches.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment