Minutes from Christian Purslow and SOS Meeting

[Daniel mote]

Look at it a different way do you think purslow is stupid. Maybe it was his way of letting potential serious investors know the exact situation the owners are in. With the banks wanting them out etc

[-V-]

Exactly, having a pressure group is a very good thing and they make positive moves from time to time. But they do act like total cocks on a regular basis. I can't see CP ever talking to them again since they have gone and made public stuff that was clearly meant to be off the record

[redstaralex]

I wasn't sure where I stood but the exclamation points and use of caps locks has me convinced

you know what, he's right, that's me convinced, I'm joining sos and I'm going to do it in my fathers for justice suit, in fact I hope that sos allow me to climb up the kop and put a yanks out banner on the club crest in my spidey costume

thank the Lord for CAPITALS and exclamation marks, YIPPEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Daniel mote]

Lets just leave the owners wreck our club then. Great idea, im in.

[Craig_H]

I can't imagine there are many fans who don't want the same end goal as SOS, however there are clearly a lot of fans who don't agree with their methodology to get to that goal.

To be honest mate, when it's the future of our club at stake, as far as i'm concerned, it's no holds barred.

[Daniel mote]

To be honest mate, when it's the future of our club at stake, as far as i'm concerned, it's no holds barred.

[Leyton388]

from my own personal experiences of several other sites before I settled on this one, the majority of the other sites seem to be run by a group of people and if you don't agree with them then you get harassed / bulllied out of the site, on one particular site I remember one of the mods told me it was their site and to leave because I didn't agree with something, this one (up to now) has been good at letting everyone have an opinion without any attempts to change your opinion to match theirs for fear of reprisal

Spot on lad

I remember someone on here got banned from RAWK for calling Kuyt ****. I think TLW and RAWK are run by SOS members.

Although i don't agree with the way SOS have gone about this as it does make them look unprofessional and not to be trusted as they have published these minutes without the clubs agreement or gone against what was agreed in the build up to the meeting.

I tip my hat to the guys of SOS for them doing something but i question their methods.

[JohnDoe]

Exactly, having a pressure group is a very good thing and they make positive moves from time to time. But they do act like total cocks on a regular basis. I can't see CP ever talking to them again since they have gone and made public stuff that was clearly meant to be off the record

But that is not true. They've made it clear to Purslow way before the meeting that nothing was going to be "off the record". Purslow could have chosen not to go along with it.

[Daniel mote]

But that is not true. They've made it clear to Purslow way before the meeting that nothing was going to be "off the record". Purslow could have chosen not to go along with it.

EXactly purslow knows what he is doing!!

[PTP]

some of the other sites out there like rawk liverpoolway are all going nuts over this massive coup for SOS and the purslow meeting but are we the only ones who are slightly critical of SOS's tactics arent overly amused by what's happened ?

no - i have read another site where the views are similar here - some people all for it, something people thinking they made a big mistake (sos that is)

[redstaralex]

But that is not true. They've made it clear to Purslow way before the meeting that nothing was going to be "off the record". Purslow could have chosen not to go along with it.

where was this noted? in an earlier meeting or word of mouth with no proper record? not saying it's been made since before you ask

[JohnDoe]

no - i have read another site where the views are similar here - some people all for it, something people thinking they made a big mistake (sos that is)

6cm?

[PTP]

The idea is ridiculous. As if the views of Shankly's grandaughter mean ****

i thought the same - no offence to her like. I've not bothered getting involved in this - i have admitted before i'm not a fan of 'sos' - i appluad there efforts for trying to do something....but i guess for me when i first head the name - correct me if i am wrong but weren't they first called "sons of shankly" - i was put off - can't explain way - i guess i just felt using Bill Shankly's name, to me, felt wrong.

[JohnDoe]

where was this noted? in an earlier meeting or word of mouth with no proper record? not saying it's been made since before you ask

Purslow was aware of it in a prior meeting with them months ago. There were no surprises. He knew full well what their policy was. He even acknowledged it during the meeting.

[PTP]

6cm?

no - i could tell you but i'd have to shoot you