Originally posted by Lecter
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Daniel Agger frustrated by Roy Hodgson’s style of play at Liverpool
Collapse
X
-
Don't be a lazy b*st*rd. This is an argument on the internet - the highest priority there is..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
-
RT @JimBoardman: Agger claims negative quotes about #LFC style of play were taken out of context - http://bit.ly/cRipRFAre we winning?
Comment
-
Well I guess Roy will decide that as he understands the language.Originally posted by NigelLG View PostRT @JimBoardman: Agger claims negative quotes about #LFC style of play were taken out of context - http://bit.ly/cRipRF
However how can you take them quotes out of context?
The only way I see it is 'he is willing to adapt to the changes but will not hoof the ball all the time maybe sometimes'
Comment
-
The answer is taken out of context if the question is different to what we assumed/expected/were led to believe.Originally posted by Baracus View PostWell I guess Roy will decide that as he understands the language.
However how can you take them quotes out of context?
The only way I see it is 'he is willing to adapt to the changes but will not hoof the ball all the time maybe sometimes'
The options are talk about it, or have an empty thread for a couple of days until you get the player issuing the obligatory denial. The fact these quotes were on camera, with the translation verified as accurate, made it even easier to talk about. The majority of posters caveat any comments with "if true", and even if they don't, everyone knows the score regardless. I'm glad, very glad he's come out and said this.Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’
Comment
-
Great PointOriginally posted by Shaggy View PostThe answer is taken out of context if the question is different to what we assumed/expected/were led to believe.
The options are talk about it, or have an empty thread for a couple of days until you get the player issuing the obligatory denial. The fact these quotes were on camera, with the translation verified as accurate, made it even easier to talk about. The majority of posters caveat any comments with "if true", and even if they don't, everyone knows the score regardless. I'm glad, very glad he's come out and said this.
Comment
-
Indeed.Originally posted by little dave hedgehog View Postthe questions were not "what don't you think"
having watched the interview, it's still a little bit damning.
Agger has explained his way out of this one.
"I'll have to adapt, even though I'm still not a player who will just kick the ball up front each time I receive it."
But what about this?
"The coach has a philosophy that players up front play football, and a different style at the back."Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’
Comment


Comment