David N'gog

[anfieldanfield]

He's a decent player, but it's pretty obvious he's not going to make it here long term.

We could keep him another year as a fourth choice striker, but what's the point ?

I'd prefer to see him sold for 5/6 million this summer while we take a chance on a striker from the youth team or a new signing as fourth choice forward.

N'gog should leave and play regular football somewhere else.

[Rudo]

I'm firmly on the fence when it comes to N'gog, always have been...but would we get £5-6m for him?
I'm not so sure tbh.

[saj]

He's turd and definitely not worth £5-6m. We'd be lucky to get half that

[Rudo]

I do feel we could do with another striker in the summer, N'gog could be on his way and you can't consider Pacheco to be part of our squad - unless there's a big turnaround.

Carroll, Suarez, Kuyt and another would leave us well stocked up in that department.

[kev776]

2or3m euros from a French first div club, I love him but he wont help us go any further. I always believe in giving them a full season to settle, then see what they can do. He has not really lived up to what is required to be a top striker in this league. Rather have one of the kids as 3rd choice striker.

[Craig_H]

In terms of goal threat, Kuyt's looked impotent of late, unfortunately.

[Drago]

I'm sorry but he;s simply not good enough

[Rudo]

So has Gerrard, what's your point?

As a back up striker(winger if needs must), i don't see the problem with keeping Kuyt.

[Craig_H]

So has Gerrard, what's your point?

As a back up striker(winger if needs must), i don't see the problem with keeping Kuyt.

Spot the difference.

My point is, having someone who is pretty much impotent up front = lack of goal threat.

Not rocket surgery.

[spud_gun]

I do feel we could do with another striker in the summer, N'gog could be on his way and you can't consider Pacheco to be part of our squad - unless there's a big turnaround.

Carroll, Suarez, Kuyt and another would leave us well stocked up in that department.

We can't and shouldn't consider Kuyt as an attacking option.

[Rudo]

Spot the difference.

My point is, having someone who is pretty much impotent up front = lack of goal threat.

Not rocket surgery.

If i was suggesting Kuyt should be starting, i would take your point but as a 3rd or 4th choice then i don't see the problem. It's not as if Kuyt can't get goals either, he's well capable of it

[Craig_H]

So if we're missing the first choice pair, you're happy for the one who steps in, to be impotent up there?

Kuyt hasnt got goals, or even looked like getting them, for a while.

[kev776]

where does it say "Kuyt" in the thread title, this is N'Gog's pidgion, stick to subject

[Craig_H]

2 goals in the last 3 months. And he basically plays every game.

[Rudo]

where does it say "Kuyt" in the thread title, this is N'Gog's pigion, stick to subject