Its some price to pay for a basic administrative error
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Luis Suárez
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
AbsobloodylutleyOriginally posted by BobTheCharmer View PostI don't think we'll get anywhere near 4th even with him. If we did, yay go us, sorry I just can't get excited about the prospect of finishing 4th, I never will. Its ****. We get to qualify for a few games in a tournament we realistically have little chance of winning. One that seems a charade until the knockout phase. Yet I grudgingly accept the mere mention of the words....champions league.... Is effectively the holy grail these days. I just want to win the ****ing league again. Yet again I accept to get the players required you need CL. Its a vicious circle of ****ness. Why do I bother caring. Not sure I do really.
I make no apologies, this is me
Comment
-
It could but (a) it would be less witty and (b) it's essentially the inverse of the solution to the classic problem, "How many bikes should I own?"Originally posted by little dave hedgehog View Postwouldn't that make bigamy having two wives too many?
The answer of course = n + 1
...where n = the number of bikes I currently own.
So the problem of how many wives I should have = w - 1
...where w ≥ 1 and = the number of wives I currently have.
Don't blame me, blame Oscar Wilde.Originally posted by TheElephantMan View PostHe hasn't quite thought it through properly, although no doubt he'll have a smart answer.
Last edited by Neil Young; 09-08-13, 11:15 PM..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Given that Wilde died before Youngman was born...
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
I had a wife who would actively discourage my collection of guitars and guitar equipment - it was an irrational dislike of the instrument and all the boss stuff you can buy with it. She was like (where w = wife)
w = g-1 as well as w= e-100000000, where e = my enjoyment of life.
I'm sure if she saw this post, she'd think "Awwww. He loved guitars. The ****"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daniel 7 View PostI had a wife who would actively discourage my collection of guitars and guitar equipment - it was an irrational dislike of the instrument and all the boss stuff you can buy with it. She was like (where w = wife)
w = g-1 as well as w= e-100000000, where e = my enjoyment of life.
I'm sure if she saw this post, she'd think "Awwww. He loved guitars. The ****"
Last edited by little dave hedgehog; 09-08-13, 11:44 PM.dave of mutilation
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daniel 7 View PostI had a wife who would actively discourage my collection of guitars and guitar equipment - it was an irrational dislike of the instrument and all the boss stuff you can buy with it. She was like (where w = wife)
w = g-1 as well as w= e-100000000, where e = my enjoyment of life.
I'm sure if she saw this post, she'd think "Awwww. He loved guitars. The ****"
Clearly the guitar was merely a symbol, a cipher, a substitute, a totem, a glyph. Did she want you to settle down, and leave behind your wild rock days/ways? Was she threatened by your attachment to guitars? Did she want you to spend your time and money on other things, on her, on holidays, on work, on a house, on achieving, on work, on prostitutes, on penis enlargement surgery?
I hate to break it to you but essentially the guitar was you. She was rejecting you,DanielPoodle..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daniel 7 View PostIts so ****ing serious around here nowadays. God bless you Neil Young and LDH
And Sarb
I'm an opponent of God..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment

Comment