Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Luis Suárez
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Clueless ****s everywhere saying he should be banned for life.Originally posted by Yozza View PostJeez I've given up arguing with ****wits in the office over this... the same cunts who still think Hodgson is a great manager & a great man
****ing knobheads everywhere
Good luck with that, you muppets
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’
Comment
-
a·nal·o·gyOriginally posted by captainfog View PostHe's not going to get in a criminal record. Jesus, listen to yourself!!
[ ə nálləjee ]
1.comparison: a comparison between two things that are similar in some way, often used to help explain something or make it easier to understand
2.similarity: a similarity in some respects
I didn't say he was getting a criminal record. I was drawing a comparison to an event that might happen in someone's life and pointing out the idiocy of espousing your 'what happens in Brazil stays in Brazil' opinion, whereby we can pretend it didn't happen because he didn't commit the offence at Anfield while wearing a Liverpool shirt and singing 'You'll Never Walk Alone'.
Surely you can comprehend that behaving like an utter dick in your own time, in a manner that leads to you being publicly reprimanded or punished, is still of relevance to your employer and therefore they have a right to consider their reaction to it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fierce View PostThat's not very simpleYeah sorry, I was being facetiousOriginally posted by Shaggy View PostHow isn't it? He bit someone, ban him for some international games. It's not "embarrassing" for us as individuals nor as a collective. He did something mad, punish him. That's it, isn't it?
All I'd add is the guy needs some help.
It IS simple, but then you posted War and Peace
I totally agree though. He did a naughty, he should be punished in accordance with the rules
I PERSONALLY think biting, as in the act itself, is 'worse' than a malicious tackle or a punch or something equally as comparable violence wise, not because of the damage done but because it suggests some kind of mental imbalance somewhere
But punishment wise, yeah it should be straightforward. Good news is aside from the rabid dogs in English media, everyone else appears to think so tooI saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought "what did you expect?"
There's no water round here stupid, should have stayed where it was wet
Comment
-
TBH as long as it does not have a bearing on him playing for us then I do not care. A couple of goals against Southampton and most on here will not give a ****.
Been getting some abuse from Scum fans, strangely bringing up Cantona and Keane made some of them go quiet - but one or two did not seem to think what they did was as bad.
Comment
-
What drives me nuts here is the intellectual dishonesty of English club supporters. When it's their player-- Cantona, Keane-- there is zero outrage when those players face a domestic ban and then suit up internationally. Traditionally, the boundary between club and country for conduct ON THE PITCH is 100% separate. There is no precedent for a domestic ban for international duty. If they use this case to set a new precedent, open the floodgates. If the English FA unilaterally punish Suarez for on pitch actions he undertook playing for Uruguay in Brazil, I would expect the PFA and Liverpool to sue as, again, it opens a terrible precedent that would radically overhaul the relationship between clubs and international football, and it would be an unprecedented punishment to Liverpool FC, having a huge impact on Suarez's value on the international football market (Spain FA would have to honor the ban) and on our ability to compete in the league if we keep him.
For me, assuming FIFA do the right thing and give a decent international ban and the FA recognize they have nothing to do with it and stand down, I am fine keeping him and fine selling him for his footballing value. I love watching him on the pitch, but I think, if we could replace his goals and stay at our level or improve and give him a move he may want anyway, I could live with it."Our legacy begets an excellence that surpasses the particulars of who produces it." -- David Carr
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrooklynRed View PostWhat drives me nuts here is the intellectual dishonesty of English club supporters. When it's their player-- Cantona, Keane-- there is zero outrage when those players face a domestic ban and then suit up internationally. Traditionally, the boundary between club and country for conduct ON THE PITCH is 100% separate. There is no precedent for a domestic ban for international duty. If they use this case to set a new precedent, open the floodgates. If the English FA unilaterally punish Suarez for on pitch actions he undertook playing for Uruguay in Brazil, I would expect the PFA and Liverpool to sue as, again, it opens a terrible precedent that would radically overhaul the relationship between clubs and international football, and it would be an unprecedented punishment to Liverpool FC, having a huge impact on Suarez's value on the international football market (Spain FA would have to honor the ban) and on our ability to compete in the league if we keep him.
For me, assuming FIFA do the right thing and give a decent international ban and the FA recognize they have nothing to do with it and stand down, I am fine keeping him and fine selling him for his footballing value. I love watching him on the pitch, but I think, if we could replace his goals and stay at our level or improve and give him a move he may want anyway, I could live with it.
Comment
-
they would sell lots more spicy italian subsOriginally posted by Slinky Skills View PostSubway should replace Sturridge with Suarez, they'd sell a hell of a lot more food.
removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.
Comment



Comment