Evra accuses Suarez of racism

[McDermotX]

Probably time to change the thread title.

[Craig_H]

How's this for fixed corruption - Suarez has a 14 day period to appeal - the 14th day takes us upto and including January 3rd 2012 - meaning the 8 game ban kicks in on January 4th 2012. And when you look at the fixture list, you'll see EXACTLY why the decision was delayed until today. It wasnt because they were trying to agree a conclusion or decision, nothing was undecided. They needed to wait until today for a very specific reason, relating to that 14 day peiod - because if it had been made ONE day earlier, the ban would've kicked in from January 3rd 2012 (Man City away) - which means it would've ended one game earlier.

Guess what the 8th game is from January 4th 2012.....

Anyone wanna take a wild stab in the dark?

No chance in hell that an appeal gets this ban reduced. That would go against the obvious and most incompetently hidden agenda going.

[Rabiosa]

Still no idea how they can ban him when there is NO evidence at all, they have clearly taken Evra's word for it and accepted a large sum from Fergie

[Baracus]

F**k Me. Where F*****d. Plus Saurez has that little Birdy finger case to answer. What will that add another 4 games.

[Assassin]

Banned for

Oldham
Man City
Stoke
Bolton
Man City
Wolves
Spurs
and...........




THE ****ING SCUM!!!

How's this for fixed corruption - Suarez has a 14 day period to appeal - the 14th day takes us upto and including January 3rd 2012 - meaning the 8 game ban kicks in on January 4th 2012. And when you look at the fixture list, you'll see EXACTLY why the decision was delayed until today. It wasnt because they were trying to agree a conclusion or decision, nothing was undecided. They needed to wait until today for a very specific reason, relating to that 14 day peiod - because if it had been made ONE day earlier, the ban would've kicked in from January 3rd 2012 (Man City away) - which means it would've ended one game earlier.

Guess what the 8th game is from January 4th 2012.....

Anyone wanna take a wild stab in the dark?

No chance in hell that an appeal gets this ban reduced. That would go against the obvious and most incompetently hidden agenda going.

[peekay]

If FA were a consistent, fair and professional organization, they would be worried about the precedent it sets. A player can cry foul about racism - no proof on TV, no witnesses to back it up - and then cause another player to be banned.

Unfortunately FA are neither consistent, nor fair, nor professional . Just like the Mascherano sending off, this will be the end of the anti racism campaign.

[Vermilion]

Look at the ****in panel ffs. What did we really expect.

[danperkins]

This is shocking, without Suarez in the side we look so much weaker. Absolute disgrace, but not surprising from the FA. Really curious to LFC's reaction to this

[ChesterDave]

Banned for

Oldham
Man City
Stoke
Bolton
Man City
Wolves
Spurs
and...........




THE ****ING SCUM!!!

Dangerous game to play but we could deliverately draw with Oldham. Give em a payday and get Luis back for Man Utd game

[paulc]

kangeroo court

double standards
FA are cunts

[Rabiosa]

Lets get a striker now.

[Assassin]

We need to appeal and draft in Grabiner to tear the cunts apart

[spud_gun]

This isn't over yet, not by a long shot.

Be very interested to read the judgement in full.

[RichC]

Does anyone think he is a racist? For me its time to give up football

[Endless Dream]

Think we need to splash the cash on an expensive striker in Jan, joke decision!!