Evra accuses Suarez of racism

[destinydude]

I hate that cunt with a passion. I normally wouldn't wish anything bad on any one but this guy I swear he dies a horrible death.

He's doing all this sucking up just get an entry into the OT pressers every week. ****ing cunt of a human being,

[Shaggy]

Remember Taylor wrote a book about Ferguson. Plus this

[destinydude]

And he has the temerity to say that the police 'over reacted' w.r.t to the Red Issue fanzine (not sure of the exact name) which had **** stirring 'Suarez is innocent' pic.

[Chazza]

And its ok to put in a fanzine

daniel taylor @DTguardian

Always supported fanzine network - still miss picking up my 'Brian' from Selectadisc - police over-reaction re Red Issue spoof today

[mick the click]

Quote:
daniel taylor @DTguardian

Always supported fanzine network - still miss picking up my 'Brian' from Selectadisc - police over-reaction re Red Issue spoof today

This ****ehawk needs punching. Like Evra. Like purplenose. Like Ferdinand.

I'm pissed off that we lost (and more so about the manner in which we lost) but these scumsucking, bottom feeders make it worse.

I'm so pissed off I'm angry at myself.

[shanks69]

fergie check list
kung fu kick a fan ok
miss drug test ok
shag your brothers wife for years ok
shag a granny prossie ok
refuse to shake a ****s hand ban him for life.

[mick the click]

fergie check list
kung fu kick a fan ok
miss drug test ok
shag your brothers wife for years ok
shag a granny prossie while married ok
refuse to shake a ****s hand ban him for life.

If only someone could convert this into a haiku it would be perfect. As it is it's bloody brilliant.

Get that on ****terface.

[destinydude]

Handshakes and all that drama

It was feverish. It was adrenaline-pumping, kid-induced silliness at its very worst. But it was just a handshake. So what if he didn't shake an opponent's hand? Is that a crime. Why pass all this bitternol and hatred over something as silly and as trivial as a handshake.

The Handshake Bit


The game began. And right on cue, the boos began for Luis Suarez. The same fans who had accused the Liverpool fans for booing Patrice Evra booed Luis Suarez (I do understand that booing a man accused of racism is quite different from booing a man who complained of racial abuse. I do know that there is a big difference between the two).

Before the game, some United fans brought with them masks strangely resembling the Ku Klux Klan. What next? Want to bring back hooliganism to the game? Seriously, why bring such poison to a game of football.

Ok. So what if he did not shake a hand? Are you all, am looking at Manchester United fans, fellow respected journalists and other assorted neutrals (even Arsenal fans, remember Wenger is one of the biggest sour losers ever and doesn't always shake hands), patron saints of the Vatican?

That handshake ritual should be done with from the game, for good. It will stop the press from wasting column space. It will stop Oliver Holt from wetting his pants on Twitter. It will stop aggravating incidens: already fragile incidents. So what if the FA, Alex Ferguson and other assorted people mildly resembling garbage or Gareth Bale, think handshakes should be continued: a part of a history or tradition if you will. So you are trying to tell me that modern day footballers, who so want to stay in light with tradtion, act like gentlemen and never dive, never ask for cards and so on.

It's a ****ing contact sport for ****s sake. Not a freak show at a tanning corporation. Roy Keane said if Ince, Hughes and he had played the game, Suarez would have wished he would have shaked hands then and there. If this is the mentality they had while playing football, no wonder that England and other associated teams belonging to Great Britain have done squat so far. All over a handshake.

Granted Suarez could have saved all the trouble by shaking the hands but he chose not to. Evra, either wanted to be a bigger man or paint himself as a saint. Given Evra's, shall we say, cockered history, he was trying to play saint. Now if I was Suarez, I wouldn't have shaked his hands either. That's just plain human nature. Suarez had come out and accepted he called Evra a negro or whatever. He has also apologised for what he did. Now it's entirely his decision to handshake or not. He chose not to. ****ing move on.

The Racism Bit


So one man called another a black. This man goes up and complains: "He called me a black. Please take action against him." The committee promptly finds him guilty and bans him. This man who was charged with abuse says "Yes, I did. But I only called him that because I heard his team-mates call him that."

At least that's what he said. Fair play to the committee because they banned him and he promptly served it. Now coming back to the bit which I find amusing is that we, Indians, having a personal opinion and feeling too strongly about it. The majority of us are blacks, with some browns being in the minority. And a very few whites, if any. Now can we understand this concept? Or do we just go by blind faith? All of us obviously go by blind faith. We are just so into supporting our own club, thump our chest and kiss our badges that we all forget one crucial thing: are we all even real fans of the club? Will we still be supporting the club we are supporting right now if we were all, say, born in England? Would I be supporting Arsenal if I was born and brought up in Worcester. The answer is obviously not. So dear Indian fans supporting overseas teams, take a chill pill, let it boil over and stop this obsession of trying to be houlier than thou. Both sets are as bad or as good as the other.

A thing I can't understand is why are rival fans and journalists not understanding Kenny Dalglish's support to Suarez. He believes that his player shouldn't have been banned in the first place. Even if he felt that Suarez was to be blamed, do you honestly expect your manager to feed his own player to the wolves: media, other players and so on? Would you even for one moment think that Ferguson and Wenger would have done something different? Wenger would have probably not seen it while Ferguson would have blamed the fourth official. And how is all this affecting the legacy of the club or the manager? These incidents will be forgotten over time while the club(s) will continue to grow.

Ferguson said Suarez's actions could have caused a riot. The United fans and journalists were already absorbing and nodding their heads. Now dear Ferguson, you know what more could have caused a riot. An idiot who came into Old Trafford wearing a T-shirt with the slogan, "This is Klanfield" with the picture of Luis Suarez. Wonder why no hack or United fans have written about it. Que Sera Sera.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written by a friend of a friend of mine. Guy's a journo/aspiring journo and NOT an LFC fan. He supports Arsenal

[JHP]

Mario Balotelli @MarioBaloteIIi Reply Retweeted Favorite · Open
If I was in Suarez boots and got banned for 8 games for something I didn't do, I wouldn't shake Evra's hand either

[Craig_H]

KD: "If someone accused me of being a racist & I know wholeheartedly that I am certainly not, I wouldn't want to shake their hand either."

This is the crux of the issue which the cuntish media either cant or wont grasp and address.

[CJ]

Is it not a bit naive of the club not to for see the media reaction?

Totally understand suarez not shaking hands, totally within his right to not shake hands. Not sure that taking a bigger picture view that it was the right decision though

[Rich]

Mario Balotelli @MarioBaloteIIi Reply Retweeted Favorite · Open
If I was in Suarez boots and got banned for 8 games for something I didn't do, I wouldn't shake Evra's hand either

Spot on Mario!

[Craig_H]

Shaggy. Damning pictures. Is there anyway you can push this around facebook and twitter. I do not have any accounts, so I cant myself

Already on twitter, in video form:

http://twitpic.com/8iizha/full

[mick the click]

Handshakes and all that drama

It was feverish. It was adrenaline-pumping, kid-induced silliness at its very worst. But it was just a handshake. So what if he didn't shake an opponent's hand? Is that a crime. Why pass all this bitternol and hatred over something as silly and as trivial as a handshake.

The Handshake Bit


The game began. And right on cue, the boos began for Luis Suarez. The same fans who had accused the Liverpool fans for booing Patrice Evra booed Luis Suarez (I do understand that booing a man accused of racism is quite different from booing a man who complained of racial abuse. I do know that there is a big difference between the two).

Before the game, some United fans brought with them masks strangely resembling the Ku Klux Klan. What next? Want to bring back hooliganism to the game? Seriously, why bring such poison to a game of football.

Ok. So what if he did not shake a hand? Are you all, am looking at Manchester United fans, fellow respected journalists and other assorted neutrals (even Arsenal fans, remember Wenger is one of the biggest sour losers ever and doesn't always shake hands), patron saints of the Vatican?

That handshake ritual should be done with from the game, for good. It will stop the press from wasting column space. It will stop Oliver Holt from wetting his pants on Twitter. It will stop aggravating incidens: already fragile incidents. So what if the FA, Alex Ferguson and other assorted people mildly resembling garbage or Gareth Bale, think handshakes should be continued: a part of a history or tradition if you will. So you are trying to tell me that modern day footballers, who so want to stay in light with tradtion, act like gentlemen and never dive, never ask for cards and so on.

It's a ****ing contact sport for ****s sake. Not a freak show at a tanning corporation. Roy Keane said if Ince, Hughes and he had played the game, Suarez would have wished he would have shaked hands then and there. If this is the mentality they had while playing football, no wonder that England and other associated teams belonging to Great Britain have done squat so far. All over a handshake.

Granted Suarez could have saved all the trouble by shaking the hands but he chose not to. Evra, either wanted to be a bigger man or paint himself as a saint. Given Evra's, shall we say, cockered history, he was trying to play saint. Now if I was Suarez, I wouldn't have shaked his hands either. That's just plain human nature. Suarez had come out and accepted he called Evra a negro or whatever. He has also apologised for what he did. Now it's entirely his decision to handshake or not. He chose not to. ****ing move on.

The Racism Bit


So one man called another a black. This man goes up and complains: "He called me a black. Please take action against him." The committee promptly finds him guilty and bans him. This man who was charged with abuse says "Yes, I did. But I only called him that because I heard his team-mates call him that."

At least that's what he said. Fair play to the committee because they banned him and he promptly served it. Now coming back to the bit which I find amusing is that we, Indians, having a personal opinion and feeling too strongly about it. The majority of us are blacks, with some browns being in the minority. And a very few whites, if any. Now can we understand this concept? Or do we just go by blind faith? All of us obviously go by blind faith. We are just so into supporting our own club, thump our chest and kiss our badges that we all forget one crucial thing: are we all even real fans of the club? Will we still be supporting the club we are supporting right now if we were all, say, born in England? Would I be supporting Arsenal if I was born and brought up in Worcester. The answer is obviously not. So dear Indian fans supporting overseas teams, take a chill pill, let it boil over and stop this obsession of trying to be houlier than thou. Both sets are as bad or as good as the other.

A thing I can't understand is why are rival fans and journalists not understanding Kenny Dalglish's support to Suarez. He believes that his player shouldn't have been banned in the first place. Even if he felt that Suarez was to be blamed, do you honestly expect your manager to feed his own player to the wolves: media, other players and so on? Would you even for one moment think that Ferguson and Wenger would have done something different? Wenger would have probably not seen it while Ferguson would have blamed the fourth official. And how is all this affecting the legacy of the club or the manager? These incidents will be forgotten over time while the club(s) will continue to grow.

Ferguson said Suarez's actions could have caused a riot. The United fans and journalists were already absorbing and nodding their heads. Now dear Ferguson, you know what more could have caused a riot. An idiot who came into Old Trafford wearing a T-shirt with the slogan, "This is Klanfield" with the picture of Luis Suarez. Wonder why no hack or United fans have written about it. Que Sera Sera.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written by a friend of a friend of mine. Guy's a journo/aspiring journo and NOT an LFC fan. He supports Arsenal

Your mate can write ok, but there are one or two things I'd take issue with:

1.

"Yes, I did. But I only called him that because I heard his team-mates call him that."

I don't believe this was Louis' defence.

2. "...do you honestly expect your manager to feed his own player to the wolves: media, other players and so on? Would you even for one moment think that Ferguson and Wenger would have done something different?"

I believe KK would have got rid of Louis immediately had he believed that he was a racist. Purplenose would have overlooked it (see cantona, giggs, ferdinand shrek etc)

[MrMichael]

Mario Balotelli @MarioBaloteIIi Reply Retweeted Favorite · Open
If I was in Suarez boots and got banned for 8 games for something I didn't do, I wouldn't shake Evra's hand either

No, he'd probably put a lit firework in Evra's outstretched hand instead