Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
At Porto he played a high line with Cb's capable of joining the midfield. Agger & Skrtel pick themselves, but they are a good partnership and capable enough on the ball. His Fb's tended to defend more than attack, but were pacy enough to get forward. Johnson & Enrique suit that well enough.
The Midfield 3 didn't contribute many goals, but had good engines and in Moutinho they had a bit of creativity. Gerrard for me can play the creative role, Lucas is ideal to hold the centre and Hendo's high work rate and good engine means he is well suited to hold the right side and provide cover when the attacking Rw comes inside.
The front three contributed most the goals. At Lw, Downing takes the Valera role. He offers pace and will hug the touchline. Valera contributed 7 goals for Porto, if Downing settles he's capable of a similar amount. Suarez plays the Hulk role. Starts on the Rw, but comes inside to link with the St and contribute a good amount of goals.
Carroll takes the Falcao role. A big man who will hold the ball up and bring others into play. Has to find the net on a regular basis though.
So there you have it. A decent line up IMO. As many others on here I would worry that certain members of that starting XI would not quite hit the heights. But if we brought in some good players then they wouldn't be bad back ups to have.
As for those we'd no longer require. Maxi is a good player but doesn't suit any of the roles. Kuyt plays Rw for Holland, so could be considered as worth keeping. Adam doesn't have the pace and energy to fit the formation. Carra would be like a fish out of water.
As for the loanees, Aquilani could provide cover as the creative element in the middle 3, but Cole I think would get the chop, though AVB & Clarke did work with him at Chelsea so may see a role for him.
What would we need? A pacy Lw who could replace/challenge Downing unless Sterling impressed enough. I think we'd also need a St who could replace/challenge Carroll. And finally a Cm who could hold the team together in the absence of Lucas.
If we're skint I guess Hoilett could suit as the Lw, Luuk De Jong as the St and Diame as the Cm. if we have more money, then obviously I could suggest some better alternatives. Hazard at Lw, Falcao/Cavani at St and Koovermans of PSV at Cm.
Nice post, totally agree
I'd like to see Downing relegated to the bench, and have a striker to challenge Carroll, I do think he's coming good and will continue to do so though
Back up to Lucas also as you said, but I don't think we're too far from a squad that should definitely be challenging for a top 3/4 place
Downing, Adam, Kuyt would all be quality subs
I saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought "what did you expect?"
There's no water round here stupid, should have stayed where it was wet
Fierce, thanks for posting FSG's detailed plan for the future of LFC. Good idea putting it in spoiler tags too.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Frank Rijkaard...
could almost anyone manage barca and be a success? just because he has a good win rate there it doesnt necessarily mean he could build a team on a tight budget for us at Liverpool.
too many high profile names walk into a top team, spend a wedge keeping a top teamat the top, and are then considered a great manager. would they be able to take a mid table Liverpool side and make us world beaters given the limited budget that will be available
Ronald de Boer...
he was never coming here.
removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.
Frank Rijkaard...
could almost anyone manage barca and be a success? just because he has a good win rate there it doesnt necessarily mean he could build a team on a tight budget for us at Liverpool.
too many high profile names walk into a top team, spend a wedge keeping a top teamat the top, and are then considered a great manager. would they be able to take a mid table Liverpool side and make us world beaters given the limited budget that will be available
For instance, Roy Hodgson.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Perhaps it's all a smokescreen. FSG want Rafa but know he has enemies, so are making it look like they've interviewed every other manager available, and one's who aren't, so they can then say "Rafa's the only one left, see?".
I know Badpiggy will be disappointed but tb honest h I'm glad De Boar has turned it down. He looks too like his brother. And Andrew Strauss.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment