Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
He's known to be a good shot stopper and I'll grant him that. But there are loads of good shotstoppers. Elliot had a storming shot stopping session against Spurs for example.
A goalie is the full package. Distribution, kicking cleanly and to distance, command of the area, shot stopping. 1 out of 4 is no good, in fact its a sackable offence in any other job.
From what little I've seen of Bogdan his kicking to distance and command of the area is very good. Not seen enough of the other two features but he's already ahead of Mignolet with 2 out of 4.
He's known to be a good shot stopper and I'll grant him that. But there are loads of good shotstoppers. Elliot had a storming shot stopping session against Spurs for example.
A goalie is the full package. Distribution, kicking cleanly and to distance, command of the area, shot stopping. 1 out of 4 is no good, in fact its a sackable offence in any other job.
From what little I've seen of Bogdan his kicking to distance and command of the area is very good. Not seen enough of the other two features but he's already ahead of Mignolet with 2 out of 4.
Dont mind a keeper who is poor at distribution and kicking if he is outstanding in command of the area and shot stopping. As you pointed out, even in the shot stopping quality, he is pretty good, not what I would call outstanding.
He's awful, never had such lack of confidence in a keeper in my life he really is wank.
Klopp on LFC vs MUFC (March 9th 2016) - "This is why I love football. This is why we watched it when we were young. I can still not have enough of it."
Always, keep your face to the sun, and shadows will fall behind you.
So, in the past two PL games we’ve allowed three shots on target and conceded four goals. But at least Mignolet’s a great shot-stopper, with that 0% save percentage.
I guess that’s harsh, given the purposefully-small sample. But on the season as a whole he’s got a 59% save percentage, a full 10% behind the PL average of 69% and joint-bottom in the league among regular starters. We're bottom of the league in saves made and second-bottom of the league in save percentage. Given all this, it's fair to say that Mignolet's shot-stopping is the worst in the league right now, or at least among the worst two or three.
And that’s the thing he’s good at.
I guess you could argue that he actually is a good shot-stopper, but he's just not showing it because we hardly allow any shots (third-best in the PL) and hardly allow any shots on target (fewest shots on target allowed in the league, if you can believe that), so it gets skewed by a small sample size. But that’s exactly my point: shot-stopping is overrated in a goalkeeper due to its randomness, especially if you've got a really good defence (because then he's rarely tested). Which, contrary to conventional wisdom, we do. So the only thing Mignolet's (supposedly) good at is the one thing he rarely does, with a small enough sample size that it gets completely washed by noise anyway. What good is it having a world-class shot stopper if, through half a season, he gives you the same production you could expect from literally the worst shot-stopper in the league?
Note, by the way, that there's a flipside to this: given the random nature of shot-stopping, if Mig keeps getting picked he'll go on a tear at some point. He'll have a few stormers, save a few worldies, and everyone's going to say he's back to his best and a really good shot-stopper and we should keep him. No. We shouldn't. Because that's unsustainable and before long you end up back here, with an average, flapping keeper with below-average distribution and one skill at the thing he's least asked to do, which is also heavily random and therefore nearly useless.
Klopp seems determined to salvage whatever he can from the current squad, bless him, and maybe he'll keep waiting it out with Mignolet to see if he can't squeeze some form out of him, because despite how **** I think he is, he's not this bad and that storming form is coming, unless he gets too far inside his own head again. But sooner or later he has to be replaced. For all the hand-wringing about Benteke and the midfield, Mignolet is by far the weakest link of the squad.
Timo Horn's got a £6.5m release clause. Just do it and be done with the whole thing.
So, in the past two PL games we’ve allowed three shots on target and conceded four goals. But at least Mignolet’s a great shot-stopper, with that 0% save percentage.
I guess that’s harsh, given the purposefully-small sample. But on the season as a whole he’s got a 59% save percentage, a full 10% behind the PL average of 69% and joint-bottom in the league among regular starters. We're bottom of the league in saves made and second-bottom of the league in save percentage. Given all this, it's fair to say that Mignolet's shot-stopping is the worst in the league right now, or at least among the worst two or three.
And that’s the thing he’s good at.
I guess you could argue that he actually is a good shot-stopper, but he's just not showing it because we hardly allow any shots (third-best in the PL) and hardly allow any shots on target (fewest shots on target allowed in the league, if you can believe that), so it gets skewed by a small sample size. But that’s exactly my point: shot-stopping is overrated in a goalkeeper due to its randomness, especially if you've got a really good defence (because then he's rarely tested). Which, contrary to conventional wisdom, we do. So the only thing Mignolet's (supposedly) good at is the one thing he rarely does, with a small enough sample size that it gets completely washed by noise anyway. What good is it having a world-class shot stopper if, through half a season, he gives you the same production you could expect from literally the worst shot-stopper in the league?
Note, by the way, that there's a flipside to this: given the random nature of shot-stopping, if Mig keeps getting picked he'll go on a tear at some point. He'll have a few stormers, save a few worldies, and everyone's going to say he's back to his best and a really good shot-stopper and we should keep him. No. We shouldn't. Because that's unsustainable and before long you end up back here, with an average, flapping keeper with below-average distribution and one skill at the thing he's least asked to do, which is also heavily random and therefore nearly useless.
Klopp seems determined to salvage whatever he can from the current squad, bless him, and maybe he'll keep waiting it out with Mignolet to see if he can't squeeze some form out of him, because despite how **** I think he is, he's not this bad and that storming form is coming, unless he gets too far inside his own head again. But sooner or later he has to be replaced. For all the hand-wringing about Benteke and the midfield, Mignolet is by far the weakest link of the squad.
Timo Horn's got a £6.5m release clause. Just do it and be done with the whole thing.
Comment