Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Top 4 finish (four out of 6)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    So we need a draw at Brighton to secure 4th, but a win could see us take 3rd?
    I saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought "what did you expect?"
    There's no water round here stupid, should have stayed where it was wet

    Comment


      If Spurs draw at home to Leicester.

      Comment


        Either way no more play offs for CL so only difference is on the income.

        Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk

        Comment


          Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
          I think that we would have had 3rd place tied up now and have been battling man utd for 2nd were it not for our CL run, even with the injuries we have. Our current team is IMO 2nd best in the league. But the squad is lacking quality when first teamers are out and we don't have the numbers to cope with 2 games a week.
          We have the best manager. In terms of quality of football, we've been pushing City (I don't necessarily think we have the second best team, but we are getting there). Utd do have a better squad (strength in depth). We've lost 5 games - City, Utd, Spurs, Chelsea.... and Swansea (we also failed to beat Utd and Spurs).
          Another MASSIVE game

          Comment


            Originally posted by Snigger View Post
            Lemar has been fairly average of late
            Southampton should be all over him

            Then we can use our special payment system when he's proven himself.

            Was muß, das muß.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Snigger View Post
              A big thank you to Conte for resting his best players in a must win game
              What a silly ****! He just gave us the option of a draw.

              Clearly he's wants a trophy and doesn't give a **** about Chelsea's CL qualification!
              Was muß, das muß.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Lecter View Post
                Agreed

                Our squad was thin anyway and with injuries picked up (and the sale of Coutinho) its thinner

                We also look physically knackered and to me its been telling that when it gets to 60-70 minutes in the last few months we have dropped off the pace. A few times it hasnt affected the result

                We've had a weeks rest and it would be nice to think that was enough but my feeling is come 70 minutes we will be running on fumes again and without the ability to make changes theres always that risk as with West Brom & Roma that we will concede

                I said a few weeks back that despite many of us thinking the defence needs addressing again, the midfield and forward positions look equally if not more in need of an injection of bodies as the current back up players arent anywhere near the quality required. I wouldnt be adverse to Klopp spending the vast bulk of his money on forwards and attacking midfielders again
                Our game is all about pace and pressing/work rate and with no options on the bench and a tired squad, the work rate drops. We are also screwed if someone gets sent off. We don't have a less energetic Plan B.. Hopefully we win on Sunday and then are refreshed for the final.

                Comment


                  Lawro got the top 4 right but had us unbeaten

                  [ame="https://twitter.com/James_Dart/status/994698799091208192"]https://twitter.com/James_Dart/status/994698799091208192[/ame]

                  Comment


                    Pedantic but we can still finish ahead of Spurs.

                    Comment


                      2nd and 3rd on 97 points.
                      If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?

                      Comment


                        To be fair, that's based on a game by game basis and not a prediction of the table pre-season.

                        It goes to show how good City have been that they're still likely to beat 99 points
                        Vive la France

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Irishnev View Post
                          Lawro got the top 4 right but had us unbeaten

                          https://twitter.com/James_Dart/statu...98799091208192
                          Is it mathematically possible for the top 4 to only lose 3 times between them? My brain hurts trying to work it out

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Lecter View Post
                            Agreed

                            Our squad was thin anyway and with injuries picked up (and the sale of Coutinho) its thinner

                            We also look physically knackered and to me its been telling that when it gets to 60-70 minutes in the last few months we have dropped off the pace. A few times it hasnt affected the result

                            We've had a weeks rest and it would be nice to think that was enough but my feeling is come 70 minutes we will be running on fumes again and without the ability to make changes theres always that risk as with West Brom & Roma that we will concede

                            I said a few weeks back that despite many of us thinking the defence needs addressing again, the midfield and forward positions look equally if not more in need of an injection of bodies as the current back up players arent anywhere near the quality required. I wouldnt be adverse to Klopp spending the vast bulk of his money on forwards and attacking midfielders again

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by fah-q View Post
                              Is it mathematically possible for the top 4 to only lose 3 times between them? My brain hurts trying to work it out
                              You can't play yourself!
                              Was muß, das muß.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by fah-q View Post
                                Is it mathematically possible for the top 4 to only lose 3 times between them? My brain hurts trying to work it out
                                Yeah definitely, why not? Highly ****ing unlikely of course
                                Like blood on iron

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X