Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Sky totally ignored it at half time. That doesn’t happen by accident, it happens by editorial decision. Sky chose to hide the ‘mistake’, either because they were asked to, or because they thought it would damage the product that they have paid so much for..
There's another rights issue relatively soon from memory, which could quite easily feed into this; nothing would surprise me.
[ame="https://youtu.be/HHQbnzRxmVA"]Have you EVER Seen a Decision as BAD as this?! - YouTube[/ame]
Also the point about replays sometimes not being shown is very true. How many times during matches have you sat there saying I want to see that again and they don’t show it.
Have they finished recording released the audio yet?
They need to release the video footage of the var room as well. Will show us Darren England looking at his bank balance online, the game on in the background, large deposit.....
Also the point about replays sometimes not being shown is very true. How many times during matches have you sat there saying I want to see that again and they don’t show it.
In amongst all the hullabaloo over the VAR incident its kind of distracted from how ****ing easy the decision was to get right with the naked eye in real time. The lino is getting away with it here because of Darren England being even more **** than him
In amongst all the hullabaloo over the VAR incident its kind of distracted from how ****ing easy the decision was to get right with the naked eye in real time. The lino is getting away with it here because of Darren England being even more **** than him
And talking if which isn't the dopey get supposed to let the move play out
Sky totally ignored it at half time. That doesn’t happen by accident, it happens by editorial decision. Sky chose to hide the ‘mistake’, either because they were asked to, or because they thought it would damage the product that they have paid so much for. Neville was obviously made aware of sky’s editorial decision after his post match comments and has fallen in line. Nobody who relies on the value of TV rights for a living can be considered an impartial arbiter, let alone a manc cunt.
I thought they showed it at HT with Redknapp saying it looked on.
They need to release the video footage of the var room as well. Will show us Darren England looking at his bank balance online, the game on in the background, large deposit.....
Cheque complete
In all seriousness though I don't know if they have a recording of what was said in the VAR room itself, but remember there are two people in that room making that decision (plus a couple of editors or technical people). I understand that one person can make a mistake like this but his mate is there to help him out, how did they both make that mistake? For me that more that what was said between VAR and the ref tells you if there are issues with the process or just incompetence.
The onfield ref was absolute ****e but his share of the blame for this one is rather small.
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
I thought they showed it at HT with Redknapp saying it looked on.
The showed it as an after thought, they had adverts, then did analysis of everything else then went back to adverts then briefly talked about it in the studio and then were saying something about the lines but then the second half kicked off.
I remember it wasn't included in the main analysis section because I was raging about it at HT
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
I'm surprised Shaggy hasn't released fake VAR audio of them tucking their chow mein only to be disturbed by the game
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Also seeing alot of other fans saying what do we want a replay would be out of order,most of which is on the back of Neville's comments about further action.
I think the club know the game won't be replayed but are keeping that card in their pocket. In terms of keeping options open they need to know what the audio says, whether procedure was followed, whether they system is flawed or whether the decision was made with bias or inappropriate influence from the officials. Until we know the circumstances we can't say more. We aren't just going to say oh you cocked up and we suffered for it, that's a shame, oh well. They can't even say we have faith in the system to know it won't happen again.
I mentioned this the other day but tribalism is holding us all acknowledge, fans of or other clubs won't get involved, because it wasn't them, but it could have been, and that is a big part of why we will be stuck with incompetent idiots using a flawed system.
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
In 30 years of watching football ive never been this angry about a match. Still absolutely seething about that **** show.
Heads need to roll and the club need to man the **** up and throw down some serious allegations at the FA. They're either corrupt or utterly inept. Make a stand and declare war on them.
Also that Super League thing is starting to look pretty good now.
I couldn’t agree more. I try not to let football affect my life but yeah this is total injustice & I’m seething.
Comment