Originally posted by RedReet
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Newcastle (H) Monday Jan 1st
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by RedReet View PostI'd say we have a much better squad than we did 2 years ago and also in 2001. In terms of results, we certainly weren't impacted by the cups two years ago.
Stuff Arsenal, then go on and lift the trophy.
When we nearly went all the way yes we were less impacted by injuries but I think the squad was more mature and settled in knowing what it could and couldn't do, players were used to playing 2 games a week at the level and pace required, for me the current squad don't have that yet. Also I think that season and so much football did have a detrimental impact on the players in the longer term. While the quad is the ultimate dream I don’t think we are ready for it, and would much rather sacrifice on competition for the players not running themselves into the ground.Originally posted by Mark79 View PostWe were far less beset with injuries in each of those seasons compared to this one already though.The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Comment
-
But injuries are going to happen regardless. We've picked up these injuries despite rotating quite heavily. Plus players like Quansah, Endo, Tsimikas, Elliot, Gomez have benefitted from getting semi regular game time.Originally posted by Mark79 View PostWe were far less beset with injuries in each of those seasons compared to this one already though.
I get the logic there are potentially bigger fish to fry etc, but all season fans keep playing down our chances. We'll be lucky to finish top 4, but when challenging for title, it's only because we haven't payed anyone good. When we win it's normally because the opposition were poor. Keep hearing how certain players or tactics are going to get found out, but here we are after having played everyone. There is nothing to say that if we go out of cup we'll win anything else or that we'll definitely avoid certain injuries, so **** it, let's go for the quad.
Plus beating Arsenal away would be a psychological blow to them and untimately benefit us in the league IMO.If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?
Comment
-
We have almost a week before Arsenal, then we stop soon after for winter break. After that there are only 4 games before the final. I honesty don't think those 4 games will take a massive toll on our squad and the benefit of winning those games could easily be worth more than the extra rest.Originally posted by Exiled_red View PostWhen we nearly went all the way yes we were less impacted by injuries but I think the squad was more mature and settled in knowing what it could and couldn't do, players were used to playing 2 games a week at the level and pace required, for me the current squad don't have that yet. Also I think that season and so much football did have a detrimental impact on the players in the longer term. While the quad is the ultimate dream I don’t think we are ready for it, and would much rather sacrifice on competition for the players not running themselves into the ground.
Perfect example being the recent West Ham game.If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?
Comment
-
My point was though that to challenge on all fronts, as we did in 2000/01 and 2021/22, you need to get off lightly with injuries. So you're able to make full use of your squad.and rotate to guard against fatigue as mich as possible.Originally posted by RedReet View PostBut injuries are going to happen regardless. We've picked up these injuries despite rotating quite heavily. Plus players like Quansah, Endo, Tsimikas, Elliot, Gomez have benefitted from getting semi regular game time.
I get the logic there are potentially bigger fish to fry etc, but all season fans keep playing down our chances. We'll be lucky to finish top 4, but when challenging for title, it's only because we haven't payed anyone good. When we win it's normally because the opposition were poor. Keep hearing how certain players or tactics are going to get found out, but here we are after having played everyone. There is nothing to say that if we go out of cup we'll win anything else or that we'll definitely avoid certain injuries, so **** it, let's go for the quad.
Plus beating Arsenal away would be a psychological blow to them and untimately benefit us in the league IMO.
This season we're already without a starting CB and both left backs. That's going to pit a big playing load on the likes of Joe Gomez. We've also been without Thiago and Bajcetic from the start. That's resulted in Mac Allister and Szoboszlai playing more frequently and more minutes to this point of a season than they've ever done before. And we've already seen that result in an injury and drop off in form in each of them respectively..
.
.
.
Comment
-
Yep agree with this. Although I do think the squad was mostly ready and equipped for such a challenge, though I think we needed to rotate more in the domestic cups than we did.Originally posted by Exiled_red View PostWhen we nearly went all the way yes we were less impacted by injuries but I think the squad was more mature and settled in knowing what it could and couldn't do, players were used to playing 2 games a week at the level and pace required, for me the current squad don't have that yet. Also I think that season and so much football did have a detrimental impact on the players in the longer term. While the quad is the ultimate dream I don’t think we are ready for it, and would much rather sacrifice on competition for the players not running themselves into the ground..
.
.
.
Comment
-
But they have rarely started in the cups and Mac's injury was an impact one. If we were in CL, both players would have played more, so not sure you can blame the number of games.Originally posted by Mark79 View PostMy point was though that to challenge on all fronts, as we did in 2000/01 and 2021/22, you need to get off lightly with injuries. So you're able to make full use of your squad.and rotate to guard against fatigue as mich as possible.
This season we're already without a starting CB and both left backs. That's going to pit a big playing load on the likes of Joe Gomez. We've also been without Thiago and Bajcetic from the start. That's resulted in Mac Allister and Szoboszlai playing more frequently and more minutes to this point of a season than they've ever done before. And we've already seen that result in an injury and drop off in form in each of them respectively.
I obviously understand your logic and should we lose to Arsenal, I'll be fully on board. Selfishly though, I want us to win everything and will take no comfort in losing to Arsenal, but bigger picture, I honestly think the upside of beating a rival and having a winning streak in the cup will be more beneficial to our greater ambitions.If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?
Comment
-
Szoboszlai has started 2 of our 3 LC games and they were both sandwiched in between him starting each of the 2 PL games a few days either side. I saw a stat saying he’s already reached 88% of his biggest season in terms of minutes played, and we’re not even half way through this one.Originally posted by RedReet View PostBut they have rarely started in the cups and Mac's injury was an impact one. If we were in CL, both players would have played more, so not sure you can blame the number of games.
I obviously understand your logic and should we lose to Arsenal, I'll be fully on board. Selfishly though, I want us to win everything and will take no comfort in losing to Arsenal, but bigger picture, I honestly think the upside of beating a rival and having a winning streak in the cup will be more beneficial to our greater ambitions.
Mac Allister, yes you’re right that was an impact injury, though I’m sure he was taken off as a precautionary because of muscle tightness in one of the games just before the Sheffield Utd one, if I remember rightly..
.
.
.
Comment
-
It's not just the game time, but more games means reduced rest and prep time for other games, and increased likelihood of injuriesOriginally posted by RedReet View PostWe have almost a week before Arsenal, then we stop soon after for winter break. After that there are only 4 games before the final. I honesty don't think those 4 games will take a massive toll on our squad and the benefit of winning those games could easily be worth more than the extra rest.
Perfect example being the recent West Ham game.The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Comment
-
He's started no EL games though and we didn't need to play him in the cup. Starting 20 games at this stage of the season is hardly a huge ask IMO.Originally posted by Mark79 View PostSzoboszlai has started 2 of our 3 LC games and they were both sandwiched in between him starting each of the 2 PL games a few days either side. I saw a stat saying he’s already reached 88% of his biggest season in terms of minutes played, and we’re not even half way through this one.
Mac Allister, yes you’re right that was an impact injury, though I’m sure he was taken off as a precautionary because of muscle tightness in one of the games just before the Sheffield Utd one, if I remember rightly.
Again, I fully understand the logic, but is the concern really warranted for 4 extra games? 4 games in a season when players have got a rare summer off, will get a rare winter break, have generally got a rare break in mid week games and all our injured players will have had an enforced rest?
The risk/downside just seems so low compared to all the potential positives.If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?
Comment
-
Stats may prove me wrong and it may have been just one recent season in particular, but I'm fairly sure we had a spell when results were much worse when we had a full week to prepare.Originally posted by Exiled_red View PostIt's not just the game time, but more games means reduced rest and prep time for other games, and increased likelihood of injuries
Again though, I get the logic, but for 4 extra games, I just don't think it's worth sacrificing a major trophy when none of those concerns might even prove to be an issue.If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?
Comment
-
You don’t think the stat I mentioned is a huge increase in playing load? A break next summer has no benefits in terms of fatigue/freshness this season. He’s done the weekend/midweek/weekend sequence more than once this season as I already pointed out. And the flip side of players having enforced rest through injury is an increased playing load on the remaining fit players. Which in turn puts them at greater risk of fatigue or injury.Originally posted by RedReet View PostHe's started no EL games though and we didn't need to play him in the cup. Starting 20 games at this stage of the season is hardly a huge ask IMO.
Again, I fully understand the logic, but is the concern really warranted for 4 extra games? 4 games in a season when players have got a rare summer off, will get a rare winter break, have generally got a rare break in mid week games and all our injured players will have had an enforced rest?
The risk/downside just seems so low compared to all the potential positives..
.
.
.
Comment
-
I don't know. I don't know why he didn't play much in those seasons when a few weeks ago he looked like Superman who could play 3 games a day every day of the week. Why didn't he play more, why should I be concerned that he's played a normal amount of games this season?Originally posted by Mark79 View PostYou don’t think the stat I mentioned is a huge increase in playing load? A break next summer has no benefits in terms of fatigue/freshness this season. He’s done the weekend/midweek/weekend sequence more than once this season as I already pointed out. And the flip side of players having enforced rest through injury is an increased playing load on the remaining fit players. Which in turn puts them at greater risk of fatigue or injury.
The other point I forgot to make in my last post was the monitoring of payers by club doctors before every game, if our main players are even selected to play. This is surely more relevant than how many games our players played in previous seasons?
Anyway, we are just going around in circles here. You don't mind if we go out of the FA Cup for the reasons you mentioned and I disagree.
If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?
Comment
-
Regarding your other point. Increases in playing load is definitely relevant but also something we've taken risks on before, only for it to backfire catastrophically. See Bajcetic last season.Originally posted by RedReet View PostI don't know. I don't know why he didn't play much in those seasons when a few weeks ago he looked like Superman who could play 3 games a day every day of the week. Why didn't he play more, why should I be concerned that he's played a normal amount of games this season?
The other point I forgot to make in my last post was the monitoring of payers by club doctors before every game, if our main players are even selected to play. This is surely more relevant than how many games our players played in previous seasons?
Anyway, we are just going around in circles here. You don't mind if we go out of the FA Cup for the reasons you mentioned and I disagree.
If you think I'm saying I don't mind if we go out to Arsenal, then I'm not sure you've followed what I been saying. My point all along has been that in order to compete on all fronts, you need a favouable wind on the injury front.
.
.
.
.
Comment
Comment