Originally posted by Alex
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Brendan Rodgers
Collapse
X
-
Ayre said there would be a "continental" model, but Brendan implied that the new team of technical people - a technical board, would be at least at the same level as him, or even he would be the head of it. That's how it came across to me, and in my opinion is significantly different to what I broadly understand the "continental model to be" where the Manager has far less influence. Maybe they are playing with words, but I can't see there being much difference between having a single person (DoF) above the Manager, or a "technical board" above the Manager - either way the Manager has diminished responsibility so if Brendan is refusing to work under a DoF it's logical to conclude that he'd refuse to work under a technical board performing essentially the same function except with more people.
-
I don't know mate. Reading that article where Rodgers laid out his philosophy, and explained the types of players he saw in each role, he said the defensive midfielder had to be:Originally posted by saj View PostIt's just my opinion really. He's not suited to playing on the right wing, no way which he has done over the last year for the reserves. I think he needs to be moved back to midfield but not the "hole". I would say slightly deeper as he is an amazing passer. He could be like Joe Allen or like Alonso alongside Lucas. I hope he gets a few opportunities next season - he is stilll very young and I think he could be a first team regular in a couple of years.
* Extremely comfourtable in possession, especially under pressure
* A good passer of the ball
* Good defensively
The other two central midfielders:
* Box to box midfielders with the stamina to get up and down the pitch
* Hard working to create 'triangles' with other players
* Good passers of the ball
So he doesn't really play with a Alonso-esq deep lying playmaker. It's more Lucas-esq, in that the player should be more mobile and better defensively. Basically, Busquets is the template. Suso doesn't really fit into either category, so he'd have to adapt his game somewhat in my opinion.
I think Sterling could make it as a wide player in his system though, as he pretty much matches what what Rodgers sets out word for word (or at least, potentially he does).K ris90210
Comment
-
Originally posted by red g View PostMods, Can we take the Poll away from this thread
not a very nice welcome when no bugger wanted him
Originally posted by Reece View PostWhat do you mean?

Some knowledgable fans though:
alfredolumbago, bacon, Barnie7, BobTheCharmer, Cerbie, Chiccada, Cleo, danperkins, Darkon, Fierce, joxers25, Kinell, kopster, MrsB, paulc, red g, RoadEnd, Robbie-fowler999, Slinky Skills, Tib, Wiresnreds, YNWA_IREI saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought "what did you expect?"
There's no water round here stupid, should have stayed where it was wet
Comment
-
Originally posted by BootRoom View PostAyre said there would be a "continental" model, but Brendan implied that the new team of technical people - a technical board, would be at least at the same level as him, or even he would be the head of it. That's how it came across to me, and in my opinion is significantly different to what I broadly understand the "continental model to be" where the Manager has far less influence. Maybe they are playing with words, but I can't see there being much difference between having a single person (DoF) above the Manager, or a "technical board" above the Manager - either way the Manager has diminished responsibility so if Brendan is refusing to work under a DoF it's logical to conclude that he'd refuse to work under a technical board performing essentially the same function except with more people.
Thats what I understood from the Press Conference comments
Yet when you look at the statement from FSG it appears they want the continental model & structure in place
At best it creates a state of ambiguity at worse Brendans view is completely contrary to what FSG's view isBob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
Comment
-
Suso definitely more than meets most the bullet points above! Defensively he has definitely started to get stuck in more but I highly doubt he will ever be as good a tackler as Lucas or Alonso. I agree with your Lucas comment though.Originally posted by kris90210 View PostI don't know mate. Reading that article where Rodgers laid out his philosophy, and explained the types of players he saw in each role, he said the defensive midfielder had to be:
* Extremely comfourtable in possession, especially under pressure
* A good passer of the ball
* Good defensively
The other two central midfielders:
* Box to box midfielders with the stamina to get up and down the pitch
* Hard working to create 'triangles' with other players
* Good passers of the ball
So he doesn't really play with a Alonso-esq deep lying playmaker. It's more Lucas-esq, in that the player should be more mobile and better defensively. Basically, Busquets is the template. Suso doesn't really fit into either category, so he'd have to adapt his game somewhat in my opinion.
I think Sterling could make it as a wide player in his system though, as he pretty much matches what what Rodgers sets out word for word (or at least, potentially he does).My kebab comes with chilli sauce
Comment
-
Originally posted by kris90210 View PostI don't know mate. Reading that article where Rodgers laid out his philosophy, and explained the types of players he saw in each role, he said the defensive midfielder had to be:
* Extremely comfourtable in possession, especially under pressure
* A good passer of the ball
* Good defensively
The other two central midfielders:
* Box to box midfielders with the stamina to get up and down the pitch
* Hard working to create 'triangles' with other players
* Good passers of the ball
So he doesn't really play with a Alonso-esq deep lying playmaker. It's more Lucas-esq, in that the player should be more mobile and better defensively. Basically, Busquets is the template. Suso doesn't really fit into either category, so he'd have to adapt his game somewhat in my opinion.
I think Sterling could make it as a wide player in his system though, as he pretty much matches what what Rodgers sets out word for word (or at least, potentially he does).
Sterling could play the same role as someone like Nathan Dyer imoBob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
Comment
-
I'd draft him in straight away. Get him started early and he could develop into our own Xavi.Originally posted by saj View PostIt turns out his nickname is Buck - true story.
I really believe Suso will now finally get a chance. If anyone has been listening to some of Bucks opinions of systems and players, Suso fits in perfectly more so than Raheem Sterling
Comment




Comment