Originally posted by Lee
View Post
Aww, stop being miserable. 
-
It's not being miserable Lee, all threads deviate sometimes, it is natural, I am guilty sometimes. We tend to do it to excess when there is nothing concrete to chat about concerning the subject matter. Sometimes I have to confirm which thread I'm in because they all look the same.Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
Those that killed her, were following the law. -
-
Poor Tommy is under pressure because he knows he owes me 20 noops.Originally posted by Lee View PostAww, stop being miserable.
Been a wreck of a man since that bet was made.If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?Comment
-
Originally posted by RedReet View PostPoor Tommy is under pressure because he knows he owes me 20 noops.
Been a wreck of a man since that bet was made.
Noops.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Norbs View Post****ing autocorrect. Pentecostal I realised that.
Good thing too, I don't want all my personal business all over the web, you never know who could be handing over information to GCHQ....
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Originally posted by kev776 View Post
Although personally I find all the aimless sh*te which is purportedly on-topic but based on nothing far more tedious. Again there's nothing concrete but it's so dull too.
Take the Mkhitaryan and Suárez threads for example. I suppose at least the former was largely driven by positivity and hope, cruelly dashed in the end though it all was. The latter is just a total waste of time and energy with absolutely no saving grace..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
And yet you've seen fit to contribute to the Suarez thread 296 times...Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
Admit it, you're as hooked on the futile self-flagellation as the rest of us, so don't pretend to ascend to some intellectual and moral high point. Join us down here in the primordial slime of pointless conjecture and baseless emotional outbursts.
Comment
-
Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
Those that killed her, were following the law.Comment
-
Originally posted by James P View PostAnd yet you've seen fit to contribute to the Suarez thread 296 times...
Admit it, you're as hooked on the futile self-flagellation as the rest of us, so don't pretend to ascend to some intellectual and moral high point. Join us down here in the primordial slime of pointless conjecture and baseless emotional outbursts.
B*ll*cks. When I flagellate in that thread, it's not me I'm flagellating. I'm as partial to chatting ****e as the next person, but I'd much rather it was entertaining or enlightening, that's all.
Reading about grown adults' fears of what they might feel if something very unlikely to happen actually occurs in reality or how someone they don't know should act in a situation they themselves have absolutely no experience of do not qualify on either count..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
"Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob PaisleyComment
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Mr touchy, I wasn't at you.Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
Those that killed her, were following the law.Comment
-
Ah, my mistake.
Ok, Herr Word Misser-Outer..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Seven years and sixty thousand posts - I'd have thought you'd have realised by now that entertaining and enlightening are in very short supply here.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
I agree. Well, apart from the grown adults bit. 'Bunch of man-children' might have summed us all up better (females excepted, of course).Originally posted by Neil Young View PostComment
-
I'm happy with one or the other. Both is indeed a rarity.Originally posted by James P View PostSeven years and sixty thousand posts - I'd have thought you'd have realised by now that entertaining and enlightening are in very short supply here.
60,000? F*ck, what a colossal waste of time.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
Comment