Originally posted by Neil Young
View Post
what a colossal waste of time. 
-
I've frequently used those words to describe you
Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to." -
If you took an average of 1 minute per post, that's approximately 24 minutes a day, every day, for 7 years.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post60,000? F*ck, what a colossal waste of time.
Comment
-
Shouldn't this be in the cyberhate thread?Originally posted by James P View PostIf you took an average of 1 minute per post, that's approximately 24 minutes a day, every day, for 7 years.
"Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob PaisleyComment
-
Originally posted by Lecter View PostI've frequently used those words to describe you
Originally posted by James P View PostIf you took an average of 1 minute per post, that's approximately 24 minutes a day, every day, for 7 years.
Originally posted by Tee View PostShouldn't this be in the cyberhate thread?
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Judging by the quality of his posts, I'd be surprised if it took him 1 minuteOriginally posted by James P View PostIf you took an average of 1 minute per post, that's approximately 24 minutes a day, every day, for 7 years.
Comment
-
:Originally posted by Sarb View PostJudging by the quality of his posts, I'd be surprised if it took him 1 minute
p.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Yeah but Suarez said he loves us, why did he lie?! :waaaaaaah:Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
B*ll*cks. When I flagellate in that thread, it's not me I'm flagellating. I'm as partial to chatting ****e as the next person, but I'd much rather it was entertaining or enlightening, that's all.
Reading about grown adults' fears of what they might feel if something very unlikely to happen actually occurs in reality or how someone they don't know should act in a situation they themselves have absolutely no experience of do not qualify on either count.Comment
-
Comment
-
That's half your life in forum posts right there...Originally posted by Neil Young View PostI'm happy with one or the other. Both is indeed a rarity.
60,000? F*ck, what a colossal waste of time.Was muß, das muß.Comment
-
I wish.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Originally posted by James P View PostAnd yet you've seen fit to contribute to the Suarez thread 296 times...
Admit it, you're as hooked on the futile self-flagellation as the rest of us, so don't pretend to ascend to some intellectual and moral high point. Join us down here in the primordial slime of pointless conjecture and baseless emotional outbursts.
Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
B*ll*cks. When I flagellate in that thread, it's not me I'm flagellating. I'm as partial to chatting ****e as the next person, but I'd much rather it was entertaining or enlightening, that's all.
Reading about grown adults' fears of what they might feel if something very unlikely to happen actually occurs in reality or how someone they don't know should act in a situation they themselves have absolutely no experience of do not qualify on either count.
Neil Young: elevating the tone by criticising the tone since 1922.Felching ≠ GerbillingComment
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Bad doggy...Originally posted by badpiggy View Post
Neil Young: elevating the tone by criticising the tone since 1922.
Was muß, das muß.Comment
-
Left out of the squad for Madrids game tonight....
A cheeky 6m bid would be brilliantComment
Comment