It’s a weird how some of the better coaches of their time didn’t adapt and couldn’t keep going at the top level. If you compare Rafa, Jose and Ancelotti who are all around the same age and how they have gone. Ancelotti did it before those two and after while Jose hung around a bit longer than Rafa but wasn’t anywhere as successful as he was at the start of his career. Both Rafa and Jose were probably more defensive minded managers, I wonder if that attitude limited their ability or willingness to adapt.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rafa Watch
Collapse
X
-
T'was a joke. One I can't remember writing, but a joke all the same.Originally posted by Doc_Piptorious View PostGod no.
Rafa had his time and with us it was great, but no thank you to even the idea of him in any hands on role for the club again.
Him as a club ambassador or similar would be a no brainer imo though.
No way would Edwards make the dream team.
If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?
Comment
-
I would say he did really good job at Newcastle given he had no budget and kept them in the league. Possibly laid the foundation for some of the success Howe is having despite Bruce trying his best to sabotage it. He did a fair job at Napoli too.
Never got a fair go at Madrid and the Everton job was doomed from the get go. I think it's hard to say he's done that badly since he's left us, just had a few poor decisions, particularly Everton. Apart from the Madrid job, he hasn't really had any resources at any club, although I believe he should have done much better with Celta.
In terms of elite managers like Rafa and Mourinho not fitting in as well, it must be something to do with their communication styles not fitting into the current generation of players. I find it impossible to believe that them and their extensive teams cannot keep up with the times from adapting what served them well to work in the current game. It is interesting that a manager like Ancelotti who apparently backs his players to 'find solutions on the pitch' more than controlling every minor detail on the pitch has managed to attain better longevity across leagues and counties more so than the old school tactician and disciplinarian type. I also think that they are built for chasing honours near the top rather than midtable management. Imagine giving Pep the Newcastle or Celta job and asking him to play his football, it'd be disastrous.
I wonder how Trapattoni would get on today. I consider him possibly the best given his track record abroad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zapater View PostI would say he did really good job at Newcastle given he had no budget and kept them in the league. Possibly laid the foundation for some of the success Howe is having despite Bruce trying his best to sabotage it. He did a fair job at Napoli too.
Never got a fair go at Madrid and the Everton job was doomed from the get go. I think it's hard to say he's done that badly since he's left us, just had a few poor decisions, particularly Everton. Apart from the Madrid job, he hasn't really had any resources at any club, although I believe he should have done much better with Celta.
In terms of elite managers like Rafa and Mourinho not fitting in as well, it must be something to do with their communication styles not fitting into the current generation of players. I find it impossible to believe that them and their extensive teams cannot keep up with the times from adapting what served them well to work in the current game. It is interesting that a manager like Ancelotti who apparently backs his players to 'find solutions on the pitch' more than controlling every minor detail on the pitch has managed to attain better longevity across leagues and counties more so than the old school tactician and disciplinarian type. I also think that they are built for chasing honours near the top rather than midtable management. Imagine giving Pep the Newcastle or Celta job and asking him to play his football, it'd be disastrous.
I wonder how Trapattoni would get on today. I consider him possibly the best given his track record abroad.
And yet, in the case of both, results at a number of clubs says otherwise.
Think the big difference between Ancelotti and Rafa/Mourinho is that the former adapts his systems and set ups to get the best out of the players he has at any given time and changes his set ups to suit the squad he has, the latter pair seem to try to make the players fit a preconceived system or set up.
Look at how Rafa used to set us up and then try to find an elite or supposed elite manager of nowadays that tries to do similar.
The two guys that come the closest imo in terms of being that conservative tactically would be Tuchel and Simeone. Tuchel's set ups are basically taking what Klopp does but removing the attacking impetus from it.I don't hate people. I just feel better when they aren't around.
Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness
Comment
-
All had different strengths at their peak though? Out of all of those, Ancelotti is known as a better man manager and has the ability to make all egos pull in the same direction.Originally posted by peterbread View PostIt’s a weird how some of the better coaches of their time didn’t adapt and couldn’t keep going at the top level. If you compare Rafa, Jose and Ancelotti who are all around the same age and how they have gone. Ancelotti did it before those two and after while Jose hung around a bit longer than Rafa but wasn’t anywhere as successful as he was at the start of his career. Both Rafa and Jose were probably more defensive minded managers, I wonder if that attitude limited their ability or willingness to adapt.
Something Rafa and Jose could never do.*Except Michael, who died.
Comment

Comment