Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Do we ****, that whole Luis Suarez affair grated me no end, cultural imperialism from a bunch of ****s who have yet to fill a single page of their passports, he is not a racist, he did not use a racist term and ****ing English people need to know the world is a big ****ing place with lots of people who use language including the english one differently..even though the term he used was spanish.
Mamo is guilty of being stupid ... he took some fat burners ..sure he broke the rules and hes ****ing stupid for doing so. Drug use within competitive sport is the norm, anybody who thinks otherwise is naive in the extreme. Whilst i point the finger of blame solely on the players, this guys are very valuable to the club and some of them are as daft as a bag of spiders ... I would micromanage their diets and biochemistry weekly, the clubs medical team should absolutely know every hair on every senior players body, including what they are putting into them on a weekly basis, any unusual stats should get flagged for closer inspection, He ****ed up, its done, If he is not banned for too long I am happy for him to stay, anything pushing on a year and then see you
I'm not entirely convinced Klopp rates him anyway. Also I don't see klopp being terribly impressed with this news. He might use this to conveniently get rid of him.
Reckon its rife but chemists will change the molecular structure of the banned substances to get around detection - like drugs & their legal high versions.
He could have taken the real thing unwittingly hence the flag. That'd sort of explain the stupidity factor plus the mitigated circumstances. Wouldn't mean he'd be anything but a cheat though, I'm just not sure how a professional with so much at stake would risk everything unless either they either knew nothing about it at all - or was as good as certain they wouldn't get caught.
I don't REALLY care about someone I've never met and have no more than a passing interest in. He plays for the football team I support
But I like him as a defender and he seems like a sound bloke in general, junkie scumbag activities aside; so I hope there is a valid reason
What if he asked someone whether it was OK to take said product, and that someone said yes, and that someone was authorised to make that decision. Otherwise why would he ask them? Perhaps he didn't, perhaps he didn't think that taking a substance without knowing whether or not it was banned could potentially ruin his career; but it seems a tad unlikely
What I dont get is, whats the point of using a masker which is also on the banned substance list, kind of defeats the purpose, test negative for steroids but positive for maskers which still carry a 2 year suspension.
Honestly I not sure if clubs already do this, but I would give the players 1 scheduled cheat day a week, the rest of the time I would have them eating meals provided by the clubs nutritionists, pre packed.
Most of what they eat is controlled by the nutritionists anyway since a lot of their meals are taken at Melwood or while travelling with the team.
Their advised on and know what to eat the rest of the time, they don't need packed lunches to take home with them.
It's not like football is coming down with overweight players and a cheat day isn't going to deter from taking banned substances anyway.
Comment