Of the established big name players we wanted here, he's not far off Morientes and Litmanen as the most disappointing. Never really rated him highly when he played for us. Had a few good games, but overall a bit meh. Obviously had quality, but never really got the whole thiago lovein and said several times over the years he should've been binned off because he was a permacrock. Won't miss him.
More of a disappointment than both Morientes and Litmanen imo. Thiago was at his peak before he joined us and would have went into any team in the world imo. He was epic for Bayern before he joined us.
His 45 min debut v Chelsea was amazing.
I think Klopps training regime might have broke him to be honest. He couldn't physically do it. Just like Sturridge.
He was a phenomenal player, but I feel we never really got to see him at his best for a long period because he always seemed to pick up injuries. This last year in particular has been very frustrating
Of the established big name players we wanted here, he's not far off Morientes and Litmanen as the most disappointing. Never really rated him highly when he played for us. Had a few good games, but overall a bit meh. Obviously had quality, but never really got the whole thiago lovein and said several times over the years he should've been binned off because he was a permacrock. Won't miss him.
No doubting Thiago was disappointing because of his injuries but I loved watching him. He was pure class at times.
Of the established big name players we wanted here, he's not far off Morientes and Litmanen as the most disappointing. Never really rated him highly when he played for us. Had a few good games, but overall a bit meh. Obviously had quality, but never really got the whole thiago lovein and said several times over the years he should've been binned off because he was a permacrock. Won't miss him.
We gotta protect ourselves in these huge contracts given to players who become perma crocks!... I'm not familiar with how's it done but isn't there some kind of sick leave clause for clubs to reduce the salary paid out to those for the length of time they are out?
Would imagine that unless a player had agreed to a pay as you play type contract that whatever contract they signed when they joined would be binding regardless of injury.
I imagine it does not suit most players to be out injured a lot either as they would miss out on various bonuses and also lose the ability to look for an improved contract or be highly sought after by other clubs.
We gotta protect ourselves in these huge contracts given to players who become perma crocks!... I'm not familiar with how's it done but isn't there some kind of sick leave clause for clubs to reduce the salary paid out to those for the length of time they are out?
Leave a comment: