Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Name your top 5 sports/events to watch on TV

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #76
    Football

    Golf

    Motorcycle racing

    World Combat League

    Dwarf throwing

    Comment


      #77
      Originally posted by Hollowman View Post
      Anyone who thinks playing four rounds of golf in four days across a championship course against the best hundred and forty players in the world isn't physically challenging obviously plays golf like they debate.
      what does it matter who you play against in golf it's not like they are pacing you from behind, you just walk around. and an average round of 18 holes of golf is about 8km including distance between holes, it's not exactly an ironman you are doing in the span of a few hours it takes to get around.

      it is mentally challenging without a doubt due to the nature of the competion, but is is in no way a physically challenging sport. No more than playing bowling is physically challenging.

      Comment


        #78
        Originally posted by PTP View Post
        If you read my defination, it says sport requires skill and/or a level of fitness - so a sport could require skill....it could require a level of fitness or it could require a bit of both

        so the other end of the skill vs fitness arguement could be say the 100m......Loads of fitness yeah, but as per Darkon's arguement of "golf is just like walking through a forest" - running is just running as fast as you can, some people just happen to be faster than others and their is no skill* involved - but it's still a sport - so darts may have the least required fitness levels of sport, but it has a very high skill level arguably higher than running.


        * before some pedantic ******* comes in - yes i know running is very scientific and therefore 'skillful' - i was just using it as random example to show why darkon's claim that golf is not a sport is just absurd you could argue any sport is just a 'game' if you wanted to.
        I read your def. and it said and/or as you stress out, which means it could just require skill, which many boardgames does - there are many other games than just the roll of a dice board games that require no luck, let's take chess, go, kalaha and scrabble for some of the more famous ones that require heeps os skill and therefore apparently are sports to your definition.

        and to me it's not absurd not calling golf a sport, the argument from golfers always end up at "it's mentally challenging" and "it requires skill" and the worst of them all clinging to straws that it's hard walking around 8km a day swining a club. To me it's no more a sport than bowling, snooker and dart.

        Coming back to my definition and what defined the real olympics, it would require a show or compitition of strenght, speed or stamina and none are applicable to golf.

        Comment


          #79
          Football
          MMA
          Tennis
          Boxing
          Darts(if that can be classed, if not Rugby League)
          The times they are a changin'.

          Comment


            #80
            Sports?
            Football
            Cricket
            Darts
            Rugby U

            Events?
            Ashes
            T20 Finals Day
            Olympics
            Football without Origi is nothing

            Comment


              #81
              will muddled be able to narrow his viewing list down to a top 5?

              Comment


                #82
                Surprised the number of people who're listing Boxing given that for years the doom mongers have long predicted the demise of the sport.

                Comment


                  #83
                  Originally posted by Darkon View Post
                  what does it matter who you play against in golf it's not like they are pacing you from behind, you just walk around. and an average round of 18 holes of golf is about 8km including distance between holes, it's not exactly an ironman you are doing in the span of a few hours it takes to get around.
                  Of course the level of competition matters. If I was playing Rory McIroy he could probably stroll about lobbing the ball around with casual 8 iron strokes and whip me silly. If he's playing a world class field he has to drive the ball long and straight on every hole, which is physically as well as mentally draining.

                  it is mentally challenging without a doubt due to the nature of the competion, but is is in no way a physically challenging sport. No more than playing bowling is physically challenging.


                  By the same token, running 100m isn't physically challenging. But doing it in less than ten seconds is.

                  Walking around a gold course windmilling isn't physically challenging. Doing it four times in as many days in less than 270 strokes is.

                  If there is no physical challenge to golf, then why are men significantly better at it than women, when the only advantage they have over them is physical?

                  Comment


                    #84
                    Originally posted by Hollowman View Post
                    Of course the level of competition matters. If I was playing Rory McIroy he could probably stroll about lobbing the ball around with casual 8 iron strokes and whip me silly. If he's playing a world class field he has to drive the ball long and straight on every hole, which is physically as well as mentally draining.





                    By the same token, running 100m isn't physically challenging. But doing it in less than ten seconds is.

                    Walking around a gold course windmilling isn't physically challenging. Doing it four times in as many days in less than 270 strokes is.

                    If there is no physical challenge to golf, then why are men significantly better at it than women, when the only advantage they have over them is physical?
                    that is why I don't really want to use physically challenging as it is to vague and I name the three things I consider that at least one needs to be a competition of ansd spped is the essential of 100m.

                    and yes men are generally physically stronger but that does not make golf a test of strenght speed or stamina.

                    Comment


                      #85
                      Mine would be:

                      Football
                      Rugby League
                      Cricket
                      Australian Rules
                      Tennis
                      "That's how I found myself on the Kop that day I had my blue-and-white scarf safely tucked away inside my coat as I listened to Liverpool songs and swayed with the masses.

                      Then City scored and I screeched and this big bloke, a Liverpool supporter, made towards me and I thought he was going to throttle me. But he just pulled my scarf from under my coat so it lay on the outside, and said: "You should always be proud of your colours, lad."

                      Lee Chapman - Arsenal and England defender

                      Comment


                        #86
                        Football
                        Cricket
                        Golf
                        Tennis
                        F1

                        Spose

                        Comment


                          #87
                          Originally posted by Hollowman View Post
                          Of course the level of competition matters. If I was playing Rory McIroy he could probably stroll about lobbing the ball around with casual 8 iron strokes and whip me silly. If he's playing a world class field he has to drive the ball long and straight on every hole, which is physically as well as mentally draining.





                          By the same token, running 100m isn't physically challenging. But doing it in less than ten seconds is.

                          Walking around a gold course windmilling isn't physically challenging. Doing it four times in as many days in less than 270 strokes is.

                          If there is no physical challenge to golf, then why are men significantly better at it than women, when the only advantage they have over them is physical?
                          Of course. It's the draining physical challenge that makes men significantly better at darts too. And chess.
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment


                            #88
                            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                            Of course. It's the draining physical challenge that makes men significantly better at darts too. And chess.
                            i think it may be that women have better things to do than play darts or chess mainly

                            like absolutely anything

                            Comment


                              #89
                              Golf, chess, darts...it's all the same.

                              Except darts can be quite interesting to watch once every few years.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                #90
                                Originally posted by CJ View Post
                                will muddled be able to narrow his viewing list down to a top 5?
                                No.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X