Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Jewish Day of Atonement 1 Rafa 0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Morphorino View Post
    another way of looking at it is if crimbo day falls on a saturday there won't be any prem games, now to someone like Yossi (as far as i'm aware christmas would just be a normal day to him) he loses out on a day he could go into work for no reason to do with his beliefs, so surely he shouldn't be refused the chance to take his particular holy day off. Solution either don't schedule games on that day if there is sufficient demand to not play (i don't think there is at this stage) or just lump it and let him do what he choses.
    There are no games on Crimbo day anyway, I wouldn't have an objection to footy being played on Crimbo.
    Should we stop playing football through Lent aswell as this is a period of asbtinence for many and many go on serious fasts at this time.
    So lets take this to another level let's just hypothetically say Carra, Stevie, Torres and Alonso all become religious fanatics and they refuse to play any Sunday games, also they refuse to play on any Holy days etc etc is that acceptable.

    Comment


      Originally posted by fredo View Post
      There is no common ground possible to this debate.
      Tolerance.

      I think it's all too easy to judge others based on our own principles without allowing that someone else's principles could be equally as valid even if they differ from our own.

      In other words, if Benayoun deems something important to him who am I to tell him it's tosh even if, as an atheist, I tend to think it is, hmmm?
      .
      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



      May the Lord bless this post.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
        What religion requires you to go out on the p*ss on a Sunday?
        None but its a personal choice.

        Comment


          Originally posted by redblood View Post
          None but its a personal choice.


          Blimey, you're being serious, aren't you?
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
            But if it's someone's funeral and you're supposed to be working your employer should give you the day if it is important to you personally to be there. It's exactly the same, an 'essential' cultural ritual taking priority over a single day of work. It's not special treatment, everybody should have the freedom to take the odd day off work for a legitimate important event that is personal to them.
            They do but everyone may at some stage need time off for a funeral so therefore it's fair because everyone gets the same treatment.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              Tolerance.

              I think it's all too easy to judge others based on our own principles without allowing that someone else's principles could be equally as valid even if they differ from our own.

              In other words, if Benayoun deems something important to him who am I to tell him it's tosh even if, as an atheist, I tend to think it is, hmmm?
              Common Sense.

              It's too easy not to judge based on our own principles without allowing someone else's principles could be equally as invalid even if they don't differ from our own.

              In other words, if Yossi deems something non important to him, who are we to tell him it's tosh even if, as a religious man, I tend to think it is, balls.

              Comment


                Originally posted by fredo View Post
                Common Sense.

                It's too easy not to judge based on our own principles without allowing someone else's principles could be equally as invalid even if they don't differ from our own.

                In other words, if Yossi deems something non important to him, who are we to tell him it's tosh even if, as a religious man, I tend to think it is, balls.
                You're wittering again, fredo.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                  You're wittering again, fredo.
                  East or West ?

                  Ahh well ... Off for a shower. See you later old sage.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by fredo View Post
                    East or West ?

                    Ahh well ... Off for a shower. See you later old sage.
                    You know a lot about Sussex for a Francophone Mauritian...

                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by redblood View Post
                      There are no games on Crimbo day anyway,
                      yes i know, why do you think that is?
                      I wouldn't have an objection to footy being played on Crimbo.
                      No but many millions would, hence why we don't have crimbo day games
                      Should we stop playing football through Lent aswell as this is a period of abstinence for many and many go on serious fasts at this time.
                      Very few actually fast for 40 days, most just refrain from eating meat and may fast on specially observed days, so as such any players should be treated in the same way as yossi, play them if they are fit enough
                      So lets take this to another level let's just hypothetically say Carra, Stevie, Torres and Alonso all become religious fanatics and they refuse to play any Sunday games, also they refuse to play on any Holy days etc etc is that acceptable.
                      Here comes this refusing to play business again, as far as i;m aware he never refused to play, the difference with Stevie, Carra, Alonso and Torres suddenly doing it is that they weren't practising these beliefs when they signed contracts. But if they did take something like this up, then the club would have to its best to support the players, maybe there could be a compromise in a crisis situation such as this might create.
                      Thomas Hicks Senior

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Pacman View Post

                        Giggle @ Fredo and Neil Young. It's like les and Nobby mark II.
                        Originally posted by Red_hot View Post
                        Bit more high brow though!


                        Missed that one! Where can I find this little barney? Sounds like fun.
                        Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by redblood View Post
                          There are no games on Crimbo day anyway,
                          All players are granted this day off regardless Momo/Yossi etc are not asked to come in training therefore making it fair to all.
                          I wouldn't have an objection to footy being played on Crimbo.
                          Why would millions object?
                          Should we stop playing football through Lent aswell as this is a period of asbtinence for many and many go on serious fasts at this time.

                          What if those who do fast on those specially observed days accounts for more than half our squad.

                          So lets take this to another level let's just hypothetically say Carra, Stevie, Torres and Alonso all become religious fanatics and they refuse to play any Sunday games, also they refuse to play on any Holy days etc etc is that acceptable.
                          Ok so hypothehtically speaking if they were already heavily religious and fasted every Sun as part of their religion and on Holy days is it acceptable they don't play on these occassions. NO it's bloody well not is the answer no special exceptions to the club the league the FA to rearrange the world to suit them.
                          Also Yossi would've had to have refused based on the fact that he couldn't wear leather footware or bathe on Saturday either causing a health and hygiene issue to start with apart form the fact that playing with no boots would've crippled him.
                          As I've said mate and I've enjoyed this debate but I'm interested in fairness to all and it's how I treat my staff and no matter how fair you try to be someone else always believes they are being ****ed so it's much easier if there is a common rule for all and every one gets treated the same way.
                          BTW I've made the mistakes of treating some different and it has come back to bite me in the arse on more than one occassion.
                          So I don't believe that it's possible.
                          Last edited by redblood; 24-09-07, 07:13 PM.

                          Comment


                            FFS, it's over for another year, isn't it? Why is this continuing?
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                              FFS, it's over for another year, isn't it? Why is this continuing?

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso View Post


                                Missed that one! Where can I find this little barney? Sounds like fun.
                                For once you've been working hard and missed that altogether.

                                Anyway it's finished now, Neil and I even made love to each other.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X