Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dubai International to make bid for Liverpool FC

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Morten_nogamst_Pedersen View Post
    Where has all this suddenly come from that we the fans expected Hicks and Gillett to come in and give us a new stadium for nothing as we are opposed to the debt being placed on the club.

    I have always expected whoever came in to take a loan out against the club to pay for the new stadium. What I (and most others) are against it them putting the money they used to buy the club as a club debt.

    This is the second source I've seen today reporting this Is the press begining to turn on us the fans or have Hicks and Gillett been feeding them something?
    The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

    Comment


      I think they've 'massaged' the fact that he's often been linked to other jobs, usually Real Madrid.
      Quote of the year :

      "With monkey me, dogface dishwasher bitch and chimp the ****ing champ you. We are turning into a raving party here arent we"

      Comment


        Originally posted by rushscored4 View Post
        As Directors of the company, Moores and Parry have probably got voting rights and could in theory veto a deal. However, it depends on the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the company as to how much power, if any, they have. I would imagine that the Co-Chairmen (Tom Hicks Snr and George Gillett) and other Directors (Tom Hicks Jnr and Foster Gillett) could out-vote Moores and Parry and remove them as Directors if necessary.
        So whatever they announce tommorrow as far as the debt go's means nothing, i wonder if Parry & Moores will be at the big Hicks extravaganza.

        Comment


          Originally posted by disco View Post
          I think they've 'massaged' the fact that he's often been linked to other jobs, usually Real Madrid.
          Anyone who believes that G&H were lining up a replacement cos they 'feared' Rafa would leave, is living in cloud cookoo land. They lined up a replacement cos they wanted him out the way as they knew he wasn't going to keep his mouth shut about the lack of funds they had.

          Although they hadn't anticipated how much the fans would kick off and side with Rafa over the whole episode, which in turn, is the only reason Rafa is still in a job.

          Comment


            Originally posted by LadyRed View Post
            Anyone who believes that G&H were lining up a replacement cos they 'feared' Rafa would leave, is living in cloud cookoo land. They lined up a replacement cos they wanted him out the way as they knew he wasn't going to keep his mouth shut about the lack of funds they had.

            Although they hadn't anticipated how much the fans would kick off and side with Rafa over the whole episode, which in turn, is the only reason Rafa is still in a job.
            When did they tell you this????

            Comment


              Originally posted by Johnny View Post
              When did they tell you this????

              I have a direct line.

              It's speculation, obviously. But it doesn't take Miss Marple to piece things together.

              G&H promised a big stadium and transfer budget.

              No big stadium-it's downscaled. No big money-just money from players you sell, not much more than we got from Moore. Rafa felt duped, made it public in November, they lined up replacement.

              Simple maths.

              Comment


                Originally posted by LadyRed View Post
                I have a direct line.

                It's speculation, obviously. But it doesn't take Miss Marple to piece things together.

                G&H promised a big stadium and transfer budget.

                No big stadium-it's downscaled. No big money-just money from players you sell,Credit Crunch. not much more than we got from Moore. Rafa felt duped, made it public in November, they lined up replacement.In case HE left

                Simple maths.It was really

                Comment


                  Hicks said 2 weeks ago that the credit crunch had not affected their plans for Liverpool - he was lying obviously, but he does that.

                  They were obviously lying when they said they thought Rafa was a terrific manager and they were fully behind him - whilst simultaneously talking to klinsman.

                  There you go...
                  Last edited by Tom; 23-01-08, 05:24 PM.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by LadyRed View Post
                    Anyone who believes that G&H were lining up a replacement cos they 'feared' Rafa would leave, is living in cloud cookoo land. They lined up a replacement cos they wanted him out the way as they knew he wasn't going to keep his mouth shut about the lack of funds they had.

                    Although they hadn't anticipated how much the fans would kick off and side with Rafa over the whole episode, which in turn, is the only reason Rafa is still in a job.
                    Spot on.
                    White liquid in a bottle = Milk

                    Purslow = C*nt

                    Comment


                      Johnny, are you really that deluded?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Dhavlos
                        Johnny, "In case HE left"??? You mean in case Rafa LEFT, as in of his own accord? You're off your head fella and gullible to boot.
                        Carefull according to Darren we're not allowed to heap derision on absolutely ridiculous assertions. Unless they're made by me - then it's open season.
                        Last edited by Tom; 23-01-08, 05:30 PM.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by LadyRed View Post
                          I have a direct line.

                          It's speculation, obviously. But it doesn't take Miss Marple to piece things together.

                          G&H promised a big stadium and transfer budget.

                          No big stadium-it's downscaled. No big money-just money from players you sell, not much more than we got from Moore. Rafa felt duped, made it public in November, they lined up replacement.

                          Simple maths.
                          Originally posted by LadyRed View Post
                          Johnny, are you really that deluded?
                          No,just being realistic.
                          The Americans taking on the club a yr ago with a plan to then spend 300 million on a stadium have to change their buisness plan due to the credit crunch and an increase in building materials prices.
                          And If Rafa hadn`t ****ed about in the CL leaving us with 3 must win games and then mouthing off in the press thus driving a wedge between himself and G+H then they would have had no need to talk to Klinsmann.Hicks has since said that they thought Rafa was about to leave but now is all is good between himself and Rafa and they will back him(Skertl) .
                          You can choose to look at the facts(Credit crunch and Building costs) or you can simply say G+H are liars.I still wait for proof they are liars.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Tom View Post
                            Carefull according to Darren we're not allowed to heap derision on absolutely ridiculous assertions. Unless they're made by me - then it's open season.
                            So you agree you make "Absolutely ridiculous assertions"

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Johnny View Post
                              No,just being realistic.
                              The Americans taking on the club a yr ago with a plan to then spend 300 million on a stadium have to change their buisness plan due to the credit crunch and an increase in building materials prices.
                              And If Rafa hadn`t ****ed about in the CL leaving us with 3 must win games and then mouthing off in the press thus driving a wedge between himself and G+H then they would have had no need to talk to Klinsmann.Hicks has since said that they thought Rafa was about to leave but now is all is good between himself and Rafa and they will back him(Skertl) .
                              You can choose to look at the facts(Credit crunch and Building costs) or you can simply say G+H are liars.I still wait for proof they are liars.
                              Without sounding patronizing, I strongly recommend that you read up about Hicks and what he's done with his other 'Sporting Franchises' and how true he's been to the claims that he made to them at the time that he brought them. I could copy and paste 100s of articles. Hicks had 'party lines' which he used to make him and his plan seem like the most desirable buyer, unfortunately for us Moores was niave enough to but into it. He's since gone back on the amount of money he promised and the size of the stadium he promised (this isn't the first time he's done this, he delayed the building of the Corinthians stadium for three years, and it still hasn't been built and niether has the youth academy that he promised).

                              Hicks, and he's the problem, rather than Gillett, had no interest or connection in the club until Gillett recruited him to come on board. There's no sentiment in his involvement with the club. He's here to bleed us dry. If they manage to refinance, we'll be no better off than we were under Moores. FACT.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by LadyRed View Post
                                Without sounding patronizing, I strongly recommend that you read up about Hicks and what he's done with his other 'Sporting Franchises' and how true he's been to the claims that he made to them at the time that he brought them. I could copy and paste 100s of articles. Hicks had 'party lines' which he used to make him and his plan seem like the most desirable buyer, unfortunately for us Moores was niave enough to but into it. He's since gone back on the amount of money he promised and the size of the stadium he promised (this isn't the first time he's done this, he delayed the building of the Corinthians stadium for three years, and it still hasn't been built and niether has the youth academy that he promised).

                                Hicks, and he's the problem, rather than Gillett, had no interest or connection in the club until Gillett recruited him to come on board. There's no sentiment in his involvement with the club. He's here to bleed us dry. If they manage to refinance, we'll be no better off than we were under Moores. FACT.
                                Well atleast your able to put facts on the table to back up your arguement.
                                But basically your saying he`s done it before so he`ll do it again.
                                Did he buy Corinthians at a time of recession when building prices are at a premium.Do you think that when they announce the new stadium plans next week they`ll then pospone building by three yrs therefore losing important revenue needed to pay back the loans?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X