Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

200/1? F*ck off

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by Johnny View Post
    Didn`t Arsenil go unbeaten all season a few yrs ago?Did you predict that?
    Did you?

    You seem to find it difficult to decipher between 'extremely unlikely' and 'impossible'...

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by DJS View Post
      Go and see what price a bookie offers you on us winning all 8 games and then ask yourself, if the chances are not slim, why you're getting about huge odds on it...
      I give up.I`ve backed outsiders before and won.the favourite dosen`t always win the Grand national,sometimes the 40/1 chance wins.

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by DJS View Post
        Did you predict it?

        You seem to find it difficult to decipher between 'extremely unlikely' and 'impossible'...

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by Johnny View Post
          I give up.I`ve backed outsiders before and won.the favourite dosen`t always win the Grand national,sometimes the 40/1 chance wins.
          Yes, but why do you think they're 40/1 in the first place???

          You're not grasping it. They'd have been 40/1 because it was very unlikely. Not impossible, but very unlikely.

          There's a difference, you see. Or perhaps you dont...

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by DJS View Post
            Yes, but why do you think they're 40/1 in the first place???

            You're not grasping it. They'd have been 40/1 because it was very unlikely. Not impossible, but very unlikely.

            There's a difference, you see. Or perhaps you dont...
            Yes but this time the favourites arn`t winning every race just before the National,while the outsider has won it`s last 7.maybe the bookies have got it wrong.



            (What were the odds on us winning the CL in 2005 at the start of the season or reaching the final two yrs later.And if we beat Arsnil over 2 legs they`ll **** themselves,maybe we`d then beat Chelsea(Again) and unlikely beat ManU in the final,God the Bookies would look stupid,like they did in 2005.)

            Comment


              #96
              Still.
              Not.
              Grasping.
              It.

              It is extremely unlikely that we'd win all 8 games.

              That's a fact. If you disagree, then i have serious reservations about you.

              That is all.

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by DJS View Post
                Still.
                Not.
                Grasping.
                It.

                It is extremely unlikely that we'd win all 8 games.

                That's a fact.

                That is all.
                Good night Deej mate.

                Comment


                  #98
                  So you dont think it's extremely unlikely?

                  Clueless...

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Originally posted by DJS View Post
                    So you dont think it's extremely unlikely?

                    Clueless...
                    WUM

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Johnny View Post
                      We`re back to pedantics.I believe that we have a chance based on current form while you don`t.
                      lol @ "pedantics". I'm pretty sure that's a made up word & you meant "semantics", but it describes the last page or so of this thread pretty well, I like it (the word that is, not the last page of the thread)
                      I could not dig, I dared not rob:
                      Therefore I lied to please the mob.
                      Now all my lies are proved untrue
                      And I must face the men I slew.
                      What tale shall serve me here among
                      Mine angry and defrauded young?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by MrMichael View Post
                        lol @ "pedantics". I'm pretty sure that's a made up word & you meant "semantics", but it describes the last page or so of this thread pretty well, I like it (the word that is, not the last page of the thread)
                        Pedantics is a word,or it should be.


                        Oxford English Dictionary:Pedantics,a form of arguing perfected by DJS on the popular Liverpool website Est1892.


                        See,told you it was a word.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Johnny View Post
                          Pedantics is a word,or it should be.

                          Oxford English Dictionary:Pedantics,a form of arguing perfected by DJS on the popular Liverpool website Est1892.

                          See,told you it was a word.
                          Ahhhhhh, that would make sense. So, an individual who practices pedantics would be a pedanticist I guess? That'd make someone a great title.......
                          I could not dig, I dared not rob:
                          Therefore I lied to please the mob.
                          Now all my lies are proved untrue
                          And I must face the men I slew.
                          What tale shall serve me here among
                          Mine angry and defrauded young?

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by MrMichael View Post
                            Ahhhhhh, that would make sense. So, an individual who practices pedantics would be a pedanticist I guess? That'd make someone a great title.......

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Johnny View Post
                              WUM
                              You're the WUM if you think it's not very unlikely for us to win all 8 games. Either a WUM or you know nothing about footie.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by MrMichael View Post
                                Ahhhhhh, that would make sense. So, an individual who practices pedantics would be a pedanticist I guess? That'd make someone a great title.......
                                It's pedant!
                                The Crushing Machine MKII

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X