Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Me too mate me too ... But what ever was said at half time worked ... that and taking off Babbs .. he was kak today ... think he is a striker or a supersub one or the other but he is not a starter on the left .. he has never impressed me in this role
Anybody who criticizes Klopp ever is a James Blunt. Nov 2015 #****CITY
Me too mate me too ... But what ever was said at half time worked ... that and taking off Babbs .. he was kak today ... think he is a striker or a supersub one or the other but he is not a starter on the left .. he has never impressed me in this role
That's why Babel won't be a regular starter. He's too ****ing erratic.
its not supposed to be easy.....if it was easy , everyone would do it.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
But that "negative drivel" is just their opinion, they're not constantly abusing other posters are they? You are never going to get everyone with the same positive outlook on here so why does it annoy some people so much that they feel they have to go off on epic rants?
There's nothing wrong with being negative. Within reason of course but the same is true the other way too.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
I've just realized: first smphotog, then Reecie. Who would have thought those two could be so wise?
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
That's why Babel won't be a regular starter. He's too ****ing erratic.
Well, the run had to come to an end sometime.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
You mean our 0-0 run? Yeah, that's really bad as realistically it had to continue.
No, I mean the run of wise posters.
You dimwit.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment