SOS to Unveil Billboard in Liverpool

[Guest]

Agreed, they could have just sent a load of sos sympathisers over to Est to engage in argument and persuasion.

If this was their idea to send a member here to promote sos, answer some questions, (even those funny ones from Pete Best) and engage in informative debate, then that's all good.

[The Glove]

You've not answered my question. I'll put it again. Do you think that SOS represent the majority of what LFC fans think?

Another question. Have you been asked to come on these forums to try and make up for the PR disaster which backfired onto SOS?

1) I think SoS does represnt the views of many. Its the actions that cause the problems. I dont knwo a Liverpool fan on here or any website or in the street that doesnt want H&G out.

If you look at the aims of SoS they are aims that appeal to everyone. Like I said, its the methods that are getting peoples backs up. But its a new organisation and liek anything, you learn from mistakes and move on.


2) I cant see it myself but if that were the case, would that not show that SoS are trying to build bridges and recognise the mistakes?


Im not a member but I soon will be I think because, nobheads aside, I happen to think SoS is trying to clean up its act and rid itself of that image. A lot more thought is going into it now rather than the 'Join da union coz its boss la an ur a cunt wool **** if u dint' image its suffered from in the past.

But I also think that the methods right now are not the correct ones but opportunities will present themselves and like any organised Union, it will be ready to work.

[merlboo]

You've not answered my question. I'll put it again. Do you think that SOS represent the majority of what LFC fans think?

Another question. Have you been asked to come on these forums to try and make up for the PR disaster which backfired onto SOS?

firstly apologies on the representation one ... i thought that was aimed at the lad you were talking with earlier ... its still in its infancy and again like in politics we may never win everyone around and it would be futile to think that , however with the foundations in place , i think were going to be around awhile ... something for the next generations ,and they can pick up the baton

and lastly mate .. i'm 42 years old and don't need to hold anyone elses hand,i've came here of my own accord ...as i've stated earlier if mistakes have been made then they've been made honestly and we'll learn from that ... if your suspicious as to why i'm here, i'm just gauging how well recieved the billboards have been ... and to answer any queries like were doing here

[Chrono]

Quite right, he's done more in a couple of posts on here to make me think again than any of the public 'stunts'
Maybe some of it is lost in translation or are communication issues, I don't think anyone disagrees with the SOS sentiment of getting rid of H&G it's just how they portray what they do and some of the outcomes (The Purslow affair)

Absolutely

[Guest]

firstly apologies on the representation one ... i thought that was aimed at the lad you were talking with earlier ... its still in its infancy and again like in politics we may never win everyone around and it would be futile to think that , however with the foundations in place , i think were going to be around awhile ... something for the next generations ,and they can pick up the baton

and lastly mate .. i'm 42 years old and don't need to hold anyone elses hand,i've came here of my own accord ...as i've stated earlier if mistakes have been made then they've been made honestly and we'll learn from that ... if your suspicious as to why i'm here, i'm just gauging how well recieved the billboards have been ... and to answer any queries like were doing here

Fair enough mate. You're welcome here in any case. We're all LFC supporters at the end of the day.

[Craig_H]

Gordon Brown?

What point are you trying to make?

If you're comparing the government to the ownership of a football club, there's a thousand reasons why it's not remotely comparable.

[PTP]

Fair enough mate. You're welcome here in any case. We're all LFC supporters at the end of the day.

of course - everyone* is welcome here

*you on the other hand....

[Scratch]

What point are you trying to make?

If you're comparing the government to the ownership of a football club, there's a thousand reasons why it's not remotely comparable.

Care to name them all? I'd settle for just a tenth of them.

[PTP]

[Craig_H]

Care to name them all? I'd settle for just a tenth of them.

How about the most fundamental and obvious one?

Our government is elected. LFC ownership cannot just be changed via an election, unfortunately.

[Tee]

How about the most fundamental and obvious one?

Our government is elected. LFC ownership cannot just be changed via an election, unfortunately.

1 down, 999 to go...

[Scratch]

How about the most fundamental and obvious one?

Our government is elected. LFC ownership cannot just be changed via an election, unfortunately.

That's one. 99 more to go.

[Craig_H]

Erm...governments take people's money by force, football clubs dont.

98 left

[Scratch]

1 down, 999 to go...

That's one. 99 more to go.

Before anyone doubts my computational skills, i am settling for a tenth of the reasons. Tee is obviously a bit more strict than me, and has decided that if Craig H is going to keep making these wild statements, he'd better have the facts in line to back them up, otherwise we will have to view every statement he makes as pure fabrication or delusion from now on. If we hadn't before, that is.

[Craig_H]

Governments dont sell scarves with their names emblazened across them