Originally posted by BigChief
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Reserves/Youth Teams thread 10/11
Collapse
X
-
No it was not, it was the coaches preferring physically stronger kids with the agenda of winning matches instead of focusing on training technical skills of technically gifted players.Originally posted by little dave hedgehog View Postin one of these reserves threads. maybe called youth development?
it was a long and well articulated series of posts, but the gist of it is still black kids ruined english football.
Comment
-
Mate, El Matador didn't say that so I'd be careful saying such. It was a reply to him from someone on another forum:Originally posted by little dave hedgehog View Postin one of these reserves threads. maybe called youth development?
it was a long and well articulated series of posts, but the gist of it is still black kids ruined english football.
http://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/show...53&postcount=1
And the point was physically larger players who just happen to be black rather than him saying black players were damaging the reserves. I think you might be being a tad over sensitive.
"My lad played at a Premier League U14 tournament at the London Soccerdome at the weekend, in effect playing a year above himself, that was won by Chelsea who defeated Arsenal in the final, you would not believe the size of the players involved in this tournament. My son's comments after losing 1-0 to Fulham were "wow dad, some of those lads had beards". Whatever ****e gets spouted by the likes of Trevor Brooking and his FA cronies, size does matter at academies certainly in the age groups under 16, when players can't be bought. Why is this? Because games are won by the team with the biggest, generally very athletic and generally black players (apologies if that sounds racist in any way it is not meant to). That is the reality of academy football in this country, including Liverpool both pre and post Segeura and Borrell."
Comment


Comment