Howdy....lurker here.
Just wanted to say I totally agree with Banditos.
I've always stuck by the managers in the past. Liverpool have never been ones to sack a manager after a few months, it's just not our way.
However, historically (i.e. the Liverpool way), we've employed from the bootroom, so they're steeped in tradition and are following the path that the previous have set (pass, move etc). That doesn't really exist anymore...not since Roy.
I think Hodgson was a bit of a panic appointment to steady the ship and get a media friendly manager. As several people have said, he's way out of his depth, and has a small team mentality, which has been compounded by his signings, and some awful tactical decisions.
If he was manging Fulham now and got these results, everyone would love him still. At Liverpool, it just won't do.
First time I've said it of a Liverpool manager.....get him out asap, so a new manager can suss out the team and make some decent signings in Jan.
And so.....I go back to Lurkerland
.
Just wanted to say I totally agree with Banditos.
I've always stuck by the managers in the past. Liverpool have never been ones to sack a manager after a few months, it's just not our way.
However, historically (i.e. the Liverpool way), we've employed from the bootroom, so they're steeped in tradition and are following the path that the previous have set (pass, move etc). That doesn't really exist anymore...not since Roy.
I think Hodgson was a bit of a panic appointment to steady the ship and get a media friendly manager. As several people have said, he's way out of his depth, and has a small team mentality, which has been compounded by his signings, and some awful tactical decisions.
If he was manging Fulham now and got these results, everyone would love him still. At Liverpool, it just won't do.
First time I've said it of a Liverpool manager.....get him out asap, so a new manager can suss out the team and make some decent signings in Jan.
And so.....I go back to Lurkerland
.
at Man City.


Comment