Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Welcome to LFC Charlie Adam

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
    What have I started
    -----------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------- You----------------------------

    Have------ Started---------to get------------everyone

    ------------Thinking-about-----Formations-------------

    ------------------------ This-allows----------------------

    them the time---------------------------------to post

    ------------------------Like-this------------------------


    It
    Will
    go
    on
    For
    page
    after
    page
    Last edited by Buzzo; 07-07-11, 01:44 PM.
    Modifying post.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
      I agree about the possible lack of width, I think you could have easily have that as a 4-2-3-1 with Lucas and Adam being the 2 in midfield and Gerrard, Henderson and Suarez as the 3 attacking midfield players.

      You could adapt that formation to give width down one side by having Henderson play wide and Gerrard and Suarez swapping over the left and central role.
      Would Henderson be good that far forward though? I admit I don't know a huge amount about him but I thought his short passing and engine were his strengths? Everything I read about him reminds me a bit of Lucas.

      In that formation, I'd even maybe have Gerrard where Henderson is and Downing left for at least a bit of width. But I still think we could do much, much better with the players we have and IMO Kuyt is still better than Carroll, Adam and Henderson, so to have him on the bench behind them would be a weakened team IMO.
      If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?

      Comment


        Originally posted by RedReet View Post
        Would Henderson be good that far forward though? I admit I don't know a huge amount about him but I thought his short passing and engine were his strengths? Everything I read about him reminds me a bit of Lucas.

        In that formation, I'd even maybe have Gerrard where Henderson is and Downing left for at least a bit of width. But I still think we could do much, much better with the players we have and IMO Kuyt is still better than Carroll, Adam and Henderson, so to have him on the bench behind them would be a weakened team IMO.
        I'm not sure that if you have Suarez high up on one side that you need the widest midfielder on the other side to be so advanced. Especially as we will have Johnson providing width on the right anyway.
        "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
        -- William Blake

        Comment


          Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
          What have I started
          With 70,000 + posts ......a lot
          _____________________________________

          Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

          Think we have the answer..Slot!!

          Comment


            Originally posted by RedReet View Post
            Would Henderson be good that far forward though? I admit I don't know a huge amount about him but I thought his short passing and engine were his strengths? Everything I read about him reminds me a bit of Lucas.

            In that formation, I'd even maybe have Gerrard where Henderson is and Downing left for at least a bit of width. But I still think we could do much, much better with the players we have and IMO Kuyt is still better than Carroll, Adam and Henderson, so to have him on the bench behind them would be a weakened team IMO.
            He was originally in the Sunderland team as a winger I believe, although he can do a good job in the centre (as he did for Sunderland last year). To be honest I haven't see that much of him as a winger so I don't know how well he would do in that role. Given our strength in centre midfield I would expect that he will play on the right, although I could be wrong.
            The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

            Comment


              Originally posted by RedReet View Post
              Would Henderson be good that far forward though? I admit I don't know a huge amount about him but I thought his short passing and engine were his strengths? Everything I read about him reminds me a bit of Lucas.

              In that formation, I'd even maybe have Gerrard where Henderson is and Downing left for at least a bit of width. But I still think we could do much, much better with the players we have and IMO Kuyt is still better than Carroll, Adam and Henderson, so to have him on the bench behind them would be a weakened team IMO.
              I would think he is more likely to compete with Kuyt on the right imo.
              _____________________________________

              Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

              Think we have the answer..Slot!!

              Comment


                Originally posted by dww View Post
                I'm not sure that if you have Suarez high up on one side that you need the widest midfielder on the other side to be so advanced. Especially as we will have Johnson providing width on the right anyway.
                Sorry, I can't see the formation anymore as I closed the page on my phone, so I don't know what you mean.

                What's Suarez role in this formation, I thought he was playing behind Carroll? And that's another point, there's surely much better formations to suit Carroll too.
                If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by red g View Post
                  I would think he is more likely to compete with Kuyt on the right imo.
                  Kuyt isn't half as effective when playing deeper in the likes of a 442, so I could maybe see him slotting in then. Any further of the pitch, then I'd be surprised if it wasn't Kuyt.
                  If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Maxiedge View Post
                    It's more like 5 from:

                    Doni
                    Skrtel
                    Kuyt
                    Spearing
                    Aquilani
                    Meireles
                    Maxi

                    oh yeah and Kelly
                    Why 5?
                    You Can Lead A Horse To Water , But A Pencil Must Be Lead!

                    Comment


                      Il be honest and out it out there... if we hadn't had paid so much for carrol, I think he would be the guy to make way in this team! with suarez playing up front with gerrard henderson/adam and lucas behind!
                      That said I think Suarez could do a great job on the left or right of a front free either side of Caroll! I think we will be hit with a few more headaches after more signings start to happen!
                      jc - after the live score and the best Soccer Blog online

                      Comment


                        What about Flanno?!!!
                        "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by RedReet View Post
                          Sorry, I can't see the formation anymore as I closed the page on my phone, so I don't know what you mean.

                          What's Suarez role in this formation, I thought he was playing behind Carroll? And that's another point, there's surely much better formations to suit Carroll too.
                          He was pictured behind Carroll 'drifting left'. But you can imagine that being close to the way Overmars played at times for Arsenal or Villa plays when combined with Torres for Spain. Both of which gave/give width without sacrificing central threat.
                          "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                          -- William Blake

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Buzzo View Post
                            -----------------------------------------------------
                            ------------------------- You----------------------------

                            Have------ Started---------to get------------everyone

                            ------------Thinking-about-----Formations-------------

                            ------------------------ This-allows----------------------

                            them the time---------------------------------to post

                            ------------------------Like-this------------------------


                            It
                            Will
                            go
                            on
                            For
                            page
                            after
                            page

                            Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by dww View Post
                              He was pictured behind Carroll 'drifting left'. But you can imagine that being close to the way Overmars played at times for Arsenal or Villa plays when combined with Torres for Spain. Both of which gave/give width without sacrificing central threat.
                              I suppose it would be similar to Spain Euro's line-up, but I just don't think it suits our team, well not with the players selected there.
                              If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by andrewces38 View Post
                                Why 5?
                                **** I honestly only though you could only have 5 subs

                                Get with it Maxiedge

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X