Never. Ever.
-
Oh I don't know. -
Oh good..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
**** himComment
-
Don't tell me what to do..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Originally posted by Neil Young View PostStop the cyberhate
from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a 
Susan Black
Comment
-
I genuinely do. I can't say I feel the same reading it alway(s) but it's strangely calming to write..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
I never ever thought that I would get a whole language named after meOriginally posted by Neil Young View Post
I genuinely do. I can't say I feel the same reading it alway(s) but it's strangely calming to write.
Stop the cyberhate
from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a
Susan BlackComment
-
Not only a language but also an entirely new branch of informal logic.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Arnish
Comment
-
Impressive isn't itOriginally posted by Neil Young View PostNot only a language but also an entirely new branch of informal logic.
By the way, we should keep Rodgers but I'm not sure FSG agree.Stop the cyberhate
from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a
Susan BlackComment
-
-
Don't tell each other what to do.Hello mert.Comment
-
Why don't FSG agree? Where did you get your information from?Originally posted by Arn View PostImpressive isn't it
By the way, we should keep Rodgers but I'm not sure FSG agree.Comment
-
Comment
-
It is an opinion. I said I'm not sure. That isn't a fact. It is a fact that I'm not sure but it is not a fact that FSG will sack Rodgers.Originally posted by AnfieldForever View Post
Stop the cyberhate
from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a
Susan BlackComment
Comment