Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Aquilani

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    needs to be written off, doesn't want to play for us and we can't get anyone to buy him. Real shame as he is clearly a talented footballer but he's just not one for us.

    Comment


      Originally posted by rcasemore View Post
      needs to be written off, doesn't want to play for us and we can't get anyone to buy him. Real shame as he is clearly a talented footballer but he's just not one for us.
      can't be that talented if no one wants to buy him even at a rock bottom price!

      Comment


        Originally posted by rcasemore View Post
        fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me comes to mind - 2 seasons in a row we've been taken for mugs
        It wouldn't suprise me if we go for the lucky number 3

        Originally posted by Kenneth View Post
        if he can settle here for a year, may as well keep him.
        Same here. It was very clear this year and year before we could have used a player of his creativity and talent.

        Originally posted by Lecter View Post
        People talk about some of our current signings being the worst ever, for me Aquilani will rank right up there.
        Could not disagree more.

        Aquilani started 12 games with us in all competitions (+13 sub appearances out of which 8 were after 75 minute or much later) and he scored 1 goal and had 6 assists.

        Downing, on the other hand, started 35 games (+ 10 sub appearances) in all competitions and had 2 goals and 2 assists (Not a single one in PL).

        Henderson started 41 game in all competitions (+7 sub appearances) and had 2 goals and 2 assists to his name.

        Adam had 31 starts (+ 4 sub appearances) and he scored 2 goals and had 6 assists.

        Given his productivity he was much better signing than any of our last year ones

        Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
        He is much better than everyone else in our midfield bar Gerrard and Lucas, his out put in considerably less games is far, far superior to Downings.
        Member #1 of the Luis Suarez fan club

        Comment


          Originally posted by Mostar View Post
          It wouldn't suprise me if we go for the lucky number 3



          Same here. It was very clear this year and year before we could have used a player of his creativity and talent.



          Could not disagree more.

          Aquilani started 12 games with us in all competitions (+13 sub appearances out of which 8 were after 75 minute or much later) and he scored 1 goal and had 6 assists.

          Downing, on the other hand, started 35 games (+ 10 sub appearances) in all competitions and had 2 goals and 2 assists (Not a single one in PL).

          Henderson started 41 game in all competitions (+7 sub appearances) and had 2 goals and 2 assists to his name.

          Adam had 31 starts (+ 4 sub appearances) and he scored 2 goals and had 6 assists.

          Given his productivity he was much better signing than any of our last year ones



          Its not about how good he is or isnt

          Its about paying a fortune for an injured and injury prone player who subsequently became chronically homesick

          Who we then had to let go back to Italy twice for daft loan deals and who eventually we will end up getting nothing for

          No matter how **** our current midfielders are or arent they will have sell on values far in excess of Aquilanis

          As a transfer Aquilanis will be ranked as a disaster

          Oh and for all his productivity it hasnt persuaded Milan to part with the £6 million needed to purchase him
          Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."

          Comment


            Originally posted by dom9 View Post


            It's done it again. This phone keeps quoting Anfield Forever.
            It's asking you to pay. It's 2 quid, come on.
            Are we winning?

            Comment


              Originally posted by Lecter View Post
              We paid £20 million for an injury prone player who at the time was injured

              Shovking signing imo

              One of Rafa's biggest mistakes
              Just because he was injured when we bought him when he was injured does not mean he is injury prone because he really isn't. I agree that we shouldn't have bought him with his injury but Rafa wasn't know he was to become homesick.

              I was excited when we signed Aquilani, that season I was really 'into' football and I saw quite a lot of him for Roma, was never a goalscorer but was very useful behind the forwards, you'll probably scoff when you read this but he played in a very similar way to Silva and Mata, always looking to pick out that killer pass. When he was on form he was magic, and £20m was probably a fair price.

              The loans on the other hand, they where ****. Mistakes made by Kenny and Hodgson in loaning him out, Kenny said he only loaned him out because he didn't fit into a 4-4-2 formation!

              If you look at Aquilani's stats you will see he is an excellent passer of the ball, had over 80% pass completion last season and could have been very useful to us had we kept hold of him.

              So like I said originally the signing of Aquilani wasn't a bad one, even though he was injured. But the loan deals by Hodgson and Kenny cost us on him, and we got shafted twice.

              I hope he stays next season.
              The times they are a changin'.

              Comment


                didnt have almost a whole season out injured just before we bought him?

                i think injury and the poor season for the club wrecked his confidence and happiness here. footballers careers are too short so i dont blame him for wanting to try again. if he didnt fancy it last summer, for him to stay on this season, he'd really have to have no offers for him.

                expect him to sign for a mid-table italian side and us to never really hear of him again.

                shame as he could definitely play. he definitely had the quality. but it just wasnt to be.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Gibbo9 View Post
                  Just because he was injured when we bought him when he was injured does not mean he is injury prone because he really isn't. I agree that we shouldn't have bought him with his injury but Rafa wasn't know he was to become homesick.

                  I was excited when we signed Aquilani, that season I was really 'into' football and I saw quite a lot of him for Roma, was never a goalscorer but was very useful behind the forwards, you'll probably scoff when you read this but he played in a very similar way to Silva and Mata, always looking to pick out that killer pass. When he was on form he was magic, and £20m was probably a fair price.

                  The loans on the other hand, they where ****. Mistakes made by Kenny and Hodgson in loaning him out, Kenny said he only loaned him out because he didn't fit into a 4-4-2 formation!

                  If you look at Aquilani's stats you will see he is an excellent passer of the ball, had over 80% pass completion last season and could have been very useful to us had we kept hold of him.

                  So like I said originally the signing of Aquilani wasn't a bad one, even though he was injured. But the loan deals by Hodgson and Kenny cost us on him, and we got shafted twice.

                  I hope he stays next season.
                  He is injury prone
                  Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."

                  Comment


                    I knew as soon as I opened the page that is what you wrote. .

                    Would you consider Cisse injury prone because he broke his leg twice? Aquilani's injurys camw from an ankle problem that he sorted out with an operation in his first couple of months with us.

                    Hasn't had a long injury lay off since. Fabio is injury prone, Aquilani isn't.
                    The times they are a changin'.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Gibbo9 View Post
                      Just because he was injured when we bought him when he was injured does not mean he is injury prone because he really isn't. I agree that we shouldn't have bought him with his injury but Rafa wasn't know he was to become homesick.

                      I was excited when we signed Aquilani, that season I was really 'into' football and I saw quite a lot of him for Roma, was never a goalscorer but was very useful behind the forwards, you'll probably scoff when you read this but he played in a very similar way to Silva and Mata, always looking to pick out that killer pass. When he was on form he was magic, and £20m was probably a fair price.

                      The loans on the other hand, they where ****. Mistakes made by Kenny and Hodgson in loaning him out, Kenny said he only loaned him out because he didn't fit into a 4-4-2 formation!

                      If you look at Aquilani's stats you will see he is an excellent passer of the ball, had over 80% pass completion last season and could have been very useful to us had we kept hold of him.

                      So like I said originally the signing of Aquilani wasn't a bad one, even though he was injured. But the loan deals by Hodgson and Kenny cost us on him, and we got shafted twice.

                      I hope he stays next season.
                      Rafa bought an injured player who hadn't played a full season in 5 or 6 seasons!! He got very little assists and didn't score many goals & he can't tackle to save his life. Aqua was meant to be a more progressive replacement for Alonso.

                      Aqua was injured for months & Rafa was wrapped in him cotton wool for some time afterwards. It was one of the worst signings in the history of the club & we have been getting shafted from day one.

                      Incredibly bad signing & incredibly bad business since then, embarrassing stuff.
                      Last edited by danperkins; 14-05-12, 09:20 PM.

                      Comment


                        He got 6 assists and 1 goal in the 12 games he started for us.
                        The times they are a changin'.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Gibbo9 View Post
                          He got 6 assists and 1 goal in the 12 games he started for us.
                          Knew you'd say that. I remember them and i also specifically remember 3 of those assists bouncing and ricocheting off opposition defenders, how on earth he got credited with them was beyond me. I know thise because he was in my fantasy football team.

                          It is no coincidence that Liverpool, Juventus & now Milan didn't want him.

                          Comment


                            Alright then, since you rate Henderson so highly who would you prefer in your starting 11?

                            I remember you saying the same about Meireles and he ended up going to this **** team called Chelsea and is about to play in a CL final.
                            The times they are a changin'.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by danperkins View Post
                              Knew you'd say that. I remember them and i also specifically remember 3 of those assists bouncing and ricocheting off opposition defenders, how on earth he got credited with them was beyond me. I know thise because he was in my fantasy football team.

                              It is no coincidence that Liverpool, Juventus & now Milan didn't want him.
                              Exaggeration there, that was one, off his chest which Gerrard scored against Burnley.
                              www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                              www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                              www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Gibbo9 View Post
                                I knew as soon as I opened the page that is what you wrote. .

                                Would you consider Cisse injury prone because he broke his leg twice? Aquilani's injurys camw from an ankle problem that he sorted out with an operation in his first couple of months with us.

                                Hasn't had a long injury lay off since. Fabio is injury prone, Aquilani isn't.
                                Aquilani is injury prone just like Agger is

                                Look at the amount of games hes played 272 games in 10 years (I wont count the first season at Roma as he only played 2 games)

                                Thats an average of 27 games per season

                                Gerrard played 439 games in his first 10 seasons

                                Lucas has played 258 games in 8 seasons

                                Agger who I also class as injury prone has played 214 in 9 seasons
                                Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X