Originally posted by Kenneth
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Racism in Football
Collapse
X
-
After the Suarez incident didn't the FA basically sat that context is irrelevant and that there are certain words/phrases that should be said on a football pitch under any circumstances. Which means if they apply the same criteria he should get the same ban as Suarez...The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Comment
-
I've never really had to question racism, it doesn't really affect me. I'm white British in a largely white British community. The Evra v Suarez case really made me think and realise how difficult it is to determine what racism is. I see millionaire footballers and they're constantly abused by opposing fans, it's part of the game. I wonder what harm a racist comment would really have on a footballer? I'm not dismissing the concept that racism is unacceptable, but I wonder how much Patrice Evra for instance was really damaged by Suarez making reference to his skin colour 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 10 or more times? I think the damage was zero. People are genuinely affected by racism on a daily basis and the current trend for footballing accusations is damaging to the genuine cause against racism. This whole thing is a complete load of bollocks. The only person I'm annoyed with during this saga is Glen Johnson who admitted that Suarez referred to him as negrito and didn't state that it's culturally unacceptable.
The point I'm trying to make is that the recent discussions relating to racism in football have been far more damaging to the cause than helpful. Patrice Evra and John Terry have made a mockery of the progress previously made.
Comment
-
Absolutely.Originally posted by Red_Polo View PostCorrect result. You can't convict someone with this kind of doubt. Burden of proof Suarez should have had.
Yup, definitely.Originally posted by Alex View PostTotally. Only annoying thing is that Suarez would have been found the same if he went through the system this way.
No, he should have had a better defence from the lawyers, but admitting he said the word "black" in Spanish wasn't the issue. It was the context the FA believed it had been used in, to insult or wind up Evra on the basis of his colour. Pretty much like in this case with Terry, though with the opposite result. Terry admitted saying "black c*nt" (which would appear much more intrinsically offensive than just "negro" on its own) but the prosecution were unable to prove beyond doubt that it had been used in an offensive context.Originally posted by baitman View Postit didnt help that suarez admitted he said negrito, as he thought it was perfectly acceptable. he should have had some better advice from the clubs lawyers
The issue in comparing the two cases is simply the difference in burden of proof, the difference in the institutions dispensing judgement, and also probably the difference in quality of legal defence.
Indeed.Originally posted by Pablo1981 View PostNail on the head I think
We're all hypocrits if we think it's ok to find someone guilty when there's reasonable doubt (there just about was here). We all were up in arms that Suarez wasn't afforded the same benefit of the doubt.
Even if it is John Terry
Bleh, nothing wrong with the law, right decision legally was made here. Whether that reflects the truth of the situation, as far as anyone other than John Terry knows what that was, is irrelevant.Originally posted by baitman View Postso much for british law...
I could not dig, I dared not rob:
Therefore I lied to please the mob.
Now all my lies are proved untrue
And I must face the men I slew.
What tale shall serve me here among
Mine angry and defrauded young?
Comment
-
Just heard on the radio that the FA are going to look at the court documents before deciding whether they will proceed with their own investigation.
It looks like they're looking for excuses to let him off
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Comment
-

Some crackers there.
Hard to beat the first one though.Javid: I’m here for John Terry. The Queen’s Park Rangers situation, this is not my business, I come only because I love John Terry. He is my favourite. I come to court because I am behind John Terry forever, and even if he’s convicted, I would go to jail on behalf of John Terry.Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 years
Comment

Comment