Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Kuyt above criticism?
Collapse
X
-
I think you missed my point.Originally posted by anfieldanfield View PostKuyt 36 games 10 goals
Bellamy 33 games 9 goals
That's ****ing ****e..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
You mean Beardsley?Originally posted by nbryan1764 View Postbut you have just said yourself why another striker would not be judged solely on goals
I'm not sure what your point is mate. Are you getting at AA's listing of our strikers' poor goal tallies?
Ultimately none of our strikers are prolific enough. Yes they offer other things such as hold-up play (Crouch, Kuyt), pace (Bellamy), link up play (Crouch) and scissor-kicks (Crouch)
, but I think it's clear to everyone we need one, maybe even two goalscorers. Who they might be is anybody's guess - there seems to be a real dearth of top class strikers knocking about.
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’
Comment
-
yes I mean beardsley. You cannot a statistical method to state one strikers abilities as fact when you use exceptions for others. I actually think you have hit the nail on the head with your analysis of strengths. We have lots of "second" strikers without having a predator. However, Chelsea have won the league for the last two seasons without having a striker scoring all th goals (while the mancs had horseface and arsenal henry), and it seems somewhat ironic that this season when the mancs have got rid of the man scoring all the goals they look likely to storm the league, whereas chelsea finally have a prolific scorer and they wont be winning it.Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso View PostYou mean Beardsley?
I'm not sure what your point is mate. Are you getting at AA's listing of our strikers' poor goal tallies?
Ultimately none of our strikers are prolific enough. Yes they offer other things such as hold-up play (Crouch, Kuyt), pace (Bellamy), link up play (Crouch) and scissor-kicks (Crouch)
, but I think it's clear to everyone we need one, maybe even two goalscorers. Who they might be is anybody's guess - there seems to be a real dearth of top class strikers knocking about.
It may be that it is the way the game has gone. I still think that the problem for us is getting people in the box. Too often we have all our players outside of the box when we are attacking. Our striker is the one that is wide looking to pick somebody out.
Comment
-
not at all. I believe you are the one starting with the funny little smilies. You just piss me off end of. Believe me I am no little kid and would never say anything on here that I would not say to somebody's face.Originally posted by anfieldanfield View PostOh. Dear.
Quite the internet warrior aren't you ?
Comment
-
Again - spot on. We'll see how good that fergie side is when he leaves in the summer. the only downside is that they'll probably get £30m+ for him and buy more quailty. But there isn't anybody in the world game is as effective at ball carrying and creating & scoring self-made chances as him at the moment. They will find it virtually impossible to replace him at this time if they let him go now.
Comment
-
No because Beardsley created so much for other players. Whilst Bellamy does have some qualities, he isn't in that league at all.Originally posted by nbryan1764 View Postdoes anybody really see bellamy as simply being in the side for goals. I would think he was more of a second striker. Beardsley's career stats were something like 200 goals in 600 games, 1 in 3. Was he distinctly average?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kopite_Colin View PostNo because Beardsley created so much for other players. Whilst Bellamy does have some qualities, he isn't in that league at all.
Missing my point. I am not comparing Beardsley with Bellamy as players. I am making the point that you cannot simply look at all strikers as goals only. They do have other abilities. I have never thought that we were buying bellamy as a goalscorer. I did think that we were buying Kuyt and Crouch for that purpose however.
Comment
-
It would've been funny if we were 3-0 up, but I just remember thinking What the hell!!Originally posted by Michael View PostLOL...... what was that all about! (ref: Momo kicking the ball 30ft in the air just for the hell of it)
Momo's immense with his tackling and stamina, but going forward you know he's going to cost us a move or give the ball away. In my opinion I'd have Alonso, Gerrard or Mascherano in the middle instead of Sissoko. He's a handly player to bring on if we're getting slaughtered, but I'd never start a game with him. Then again I'm not the boss!
I think the jury is still out on Kuyt, he does give 110% every second, but he drifts too far wide in my opinion. For him to be our 20 goal a season striker - and he could be - he does need to get in the box more... Gonzalez, Pennant, Finnan etc should be supplying the ammo from the flanks, not Kuyt. I just don't think any of our strikers bar Kuyt have had a chance to get any rythym going this season. Perhaps it's time for Rafa to rotate the front two.
Comment
-
I didn't.Originally posted by nbryan1764 View PostMissing my point. I am not comparing Beardsley with Bellamy as players. I am making the point that you cannot simply look at all strikers as goals only. They do have other abilities. I have never thought that we were buying bellamy as a goalscorer. I did think that we were buying Kuyt and Crouch for that purpose however.
Who's to say?.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
Comment