Apparently, we're helping United get Tevez...

[Morph]

None of us are perfect sadly, yourself and Morph (just to name two people who ive just seen posting on this thread) have traits which annoy me too, but that's you and it's tough luck for me that i find you to be annoying on some occasions. That's part of life isnt it?

What do you find annoying about me? (just so i know to carry on doing it)

[bazza76]

What's all this football talk about, this thread was starting to get interesting, all of ya football people **** off, and lets get back to the bitch fight

[RedReet]

Hmm...wouldn't agree there. Cole was a proper predator...a ****ing goal-hanging ****...while Yorke always came deeper.

Hmmm... They were both hateful ***** that played for the scum, that similar enough for you???

And with reference to Tevez, when reading about how he might not get approval to play before the season starts, came across this:

'Even if the dispute does drag on beyond the end of August, Tevez could still join United between transfer windows if FIFA declare him an effective free agent.

That scenario happened with Tevez's compatriot Javier Mascherano before he was finally allowed to link up with Liverpool earlier this year.'

Surely this wasn't the case. Did the FA not put off the transfer until the last day, and scrape it through at the last minute. Were we not lead to believe that if the FA didn't receive al the paperwork before the deadline, the transfer would be off?

[Craig_H]

What do you find annoying about me? (just so i know to carry on doing it)

I find you to be one of the so-called 'RCDNW' brigade, more due to the way i perceive you to be rather 'red tinted specs' and 'head in sand' about LFC generally really, as opposed to simply to do with Rafa himself.

[Morph]

I find you to be one of the so-called 'RCDNW' brigade, more due to the way i perceive you to be rather 'red tinted specs' and 'head in sand' about LFC generally really, as opposed to simply to do with Rafa himself.

Hmm, different ways of looking at things, you might say RCDNW, I might say positivity. Certainly wouldn't say 'head in the sand', I can perfectly well see everything that's going on around but prefer to be more vocal on the positives rather than the negatives because that's the type of person I am, red tinted specs well yeah but a lot of people might just call that supporting your club (althought not blindly, might I add)

[Shaggy]

Come on lads, let's keep it on topic huh.

[Craig_H]

Hmm, different ways of looking at things, you might say RCDNW, I might say positivity. Certainly wouldn't say 'head in the sand', I can perfectly well see everything that's going on around but prefer to be more vocal on the positives rather than the negatives because that's the type of person I am, red tinted specs well yeah but a lot of people might just call that supporting your club (althought not blindly, might I add)

I agree with supporting your club obviously, and sure, when i'm talking with rival supporters, i'm probably more positive (and defensive) of my club's failings, but when it comes to talking to other reds, i dont think i'm negative as such, i just think i'm 'real' and have the ability to see things from a more objective POV.

When i see people who (as i see it) can never see anything wrong, always somehow see something bad in a positive manner, it reaches the point of farce and it's often cringeworthily embarrassing IMO.

[Morph]

Come on lads, let's keep it on topic huh.

Shags can we change the topic to Jeremy Kyle meets Est1892 then?

[Morph]

I agree with supporting your club obviously, and sure, when i'm talking with rival supporters, i'm probably more positive (and defensive) of my club's failings, but when it comes to talking to other reds, i dont think i'm negative as such, i just think i'm 'real' and have the ability to see things from a more objective POV.

When i see people who (as i see it) can never see anything wrong, always somehow see something bad in a positive manner, it reaches the point of farce and it's often cringeworthily embarrassing IMO.

If that's your impression of me then I doubt you've read all of my posts, tell it like I see it usually and with a club of our standing there's going to be more positives to speak of than negatives anyway, just depends on which discussions you choose to engage in I guess

[Craig_H]

If that's your impression of me then I doubt you've read all of my posts, tell it like I see it usually and with a club of our standing there's going to be more positives to speak of than negatives anyway, just depends on which discussions you choose to engage in I guess

It's formed from the posts i HAVE read from you, obviously i havent read them all. But i dont CHOOSE to form any impression, that's just the feeling i get when i've read some of your posts. Not intentional, just natural.

Being honest here, dont mean to offend.

[dww]

I read somewhere a comparison between Messi and Tevez upfront and how Rooney and Tevez might work. This was before the final of the Copa America. It was quite interesting and made me think about what the advanced striker has done for United in the last season and a bit.

Basically they have moved the defence around and chipped in with a few goals but mostly acted as a sort of target man. Not you typical English 6 foot plus big heading target man but a pacy fulcrum to attacks taking the ball and pushing defences back/around to lay the ball of to the wingers/Rooney & Scholes. This has worked very well (it reminds me of how Mista played fro Rafa at Valencia actually) and in this light I think Tevez could do a great job for United.

I guess we saw the down side to the two short arses upfront approach in the Copa final with it removing one dimension to a teams play which can sometimes be useful to unsettle people. While they have another option be it Saha or Smith in the squad though they should always be able to make the change.

[Morph]

It's formed from the posts i HAVE read from you, obviously i havent read them all. But i dont CHOOSE to form any impression, that's just the feeling i get when i've read some of your posts. Not intentional, just natural.

Being honest here, dont mean to offend.

Don't get offended by ppl on the net mate so don't worry, just curious is all. Anywho get the feeling we don't see eye to eye on very much so doubt impressions are going to change any time soon.

[BillobShaisley]

Well Dunk does speak a load of BS its true, but they way it was told to me was you'd banned me and deleted my account without permission etc. Which IMO showed me exactly how things went. I changed to this user name after that. Maybe send me a PM if you think that story needs correcting.

You were posting under the same username as you are here, and were banned. Then, you say you came back - from this point, i dont know what new username you had. But i know who you are/were when you were banned and i know who banned you. I dont need to make anything up where that's concerned.

As for your point on what i do with regards to twisting words, i answered that. You seem to have ignored my response. So no, your 'point' doesnt seem to have been made at all, in actual fact.

Whatever you try and turn it into, the point is you come on here attacking me and unless i happily sit there and nod along, you revert back to the usual nonsense. You accused me of banning you and i didnt. I have the right to defend myself and correct your mistake, and dont get me wrong, it's to be expected that you dont like the fact that i did that. Nobody likes being wrong.

I refer the gentleman to my previous post and his own ramblings.

[Craig_H]

I dont remember your username before this one, but i certainly new that the 2nd one (the one you're using on here) was you (eg the same person who'd been banned, and then returned). I wasnt a fan of yours but i know i didnt ban you.

[The Glove]

And we all lived happily ever after.

If you two want to carry this on its do it via pm. Anymore in this thread and the modding duties will be kicking in.


I thank you.