Originally posted by Jazzmaster
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rafa Benitez tells Xabi Alonso: Step things up
Collapse
X
-
It's not impossible but we only had a few days between the games so Rafa couldn't afford to take any chances. Marseille away is a very difficult game so he needed his key players fit and ready.Originally posted by DJS View PostErm...we won 11 games in a row last season...
Why is winning at Reading, then at Marseille apparently 'impossible' to do?
It would have been mayhem in here if Rafa had played his strongest team against Reading and then lost against Marseille. We would have called him a ****ing idiot if that would have happened.
IMO.Just believe and you never know what will happen.
According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.
Comment
-
No arguments with that mate, but the key point is 'on form'. Kuyt hasnt been for about 3 months now, yet he still plays. It's clear you too wouldnt pick kuyt now...which is fair enough. Maybe rafa's waning on it too.Originally posted by Dhavlos View PostFair enough, although I'd point out that his Pompey performance was far from being an isolated poor performance, just the final straw.
No aggressive undertones detected
I'd agree that Crouch is miles better than Kuyt on a technical level but that doesn't necessarily mean, to my way of thinking anyway, that when both are on form that Crouch offers more to the team than Kuyt does. In this regard I'd highlight Kuyt's performance v Newcastle where he seemed to be the perfect foil for Torres.
He should've done so ages ago though, and we might still have some kind of title challenge if he had. Cant say for sure.
I AM certain that we'd have no doubt about a top four finish right now, if Crouch had been playing for the last few months...
Comment
-
Sacrifice?Originally posted by Johnny View PostThat was just before the most important game of the season so far and i believe he used it to prove to the Yanks that we have not enough strength in depth to compete in the PL and CL simultaniosly.hence his request days afterwards for a move in the transfer market.That week was obviosly all about the extra CL money needed for tranfer funds.Hence the sacrifice at Reading.
Hah.
See, this is the kind of risible, laughable even, justification for those events.
It's totally based on the supposition that a)Marseille was the most important game of the season - it wasn't to me and most other reds, that would've been the points on offer at Reading and then the scum at home the weekend after, and b) as suggested above that Rafa did pick an under strength team and silly formation, with the intention of increasing the possibility of losing in that game as some sort of ridiculous statement that the current squad wasn't good enough.
Are we really supposed to believe that?
Let's be clear here, he picked a side to win that game, as a manager would do. Only when it went wrong, largely because of him, he decided that resting our best players for the next game was more important, because (I think) he's brainwashed people into his fatuous rotation, big squad way of thinking that this needed to be done to beat a poor Marseille team days later.
In retrospect what it did do was destroy any momentum we had in the league, and also belief. What it told me was we had a manger who decided that it wasn't worth fighting for 3 points with everything he had available on the day.
That might be the truth, it may not, but it's my interpretation, and nothing that Rafa has done since has made me change my opinion.
It wasn't good enough then, and it still isn't now.
And I await improvement.I hate Polanski
Comment
-
We had ManU after Marseille also.Reading was a sacrifice to prove a point.IMHO.Originally posted by AFII View PostIt's not impossible but we only had a few days between the games so Rafa couldn't afford to take any chances. Marseille away is a very difficult game so he needed his key players fit and ready.
It would have been mayhem in here if Rafa had played his strongest team against Reading and then lost against Marseille. We would have called him a ****ing idiot if that would have happened.
IMO.
Comment
-
Proof?Originally posted by DJS View PostWell sorry, but he IS doing it now...
First time for everything fella.Just believe and you never know what will happen.
According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.
Comment
-
Paraphrasing maybe, but it's the general gist of what he was saying mate!Originally posted by Dhavlos View PostYou're putting words into his mouth there Syd.
I look into my crystal ball and i see the end of the season...where things havent improved much...and you're heard muttering "Ah, let's give him ONE more season...!"I'm happy to take a seat on the fence at present on the whole thing. I'll reserve full and final judgment until the end of the season.
Comment
-
Yes, but we're not Everton on our first european campaign for 30 years here....Originally posted by AFII View PostIt's not impossible but we only had a few days between the games so Rafa couldn't afford to take any chances. Marseille away is a very difficult game so he needed his key players fit and ready.
It would have been mayhem in here if Rafa had played his strongest team against Reading and then lost against Marseille. We would have called him a ****ing idiot if that would have happened.
IMO.
We're seasoned CL campaigners and with the size of squad we have, winning at Reading and then in Marseille 4 days later shouldnt be considered a tricky 'mission'...
Comment
-
DJS, you do know that Kuyt hasn't played that much the last two months compared to the start of the season? He was even benched three games in a row if I remember things right.
So Rafa isn't favourising him.Just believe and you never know what will happen.
According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.
Comment
-
Fair enough,It might be a little far fetched but it did prove that we didn`t have the team to compete in all three games.A week later Rafa got embroiled in a row with G+H about transfers knowing they were on their way to Anfield to watch us against ManU.Originally posted by CharlieMansonsSquint View PostSacrifice?
Hah.
See, this is the kind of risible, laughable even, justification for those events.
It's totally based on the supposition that a)Marseille was the most important game of the season - it wasn't to me and most other reds, that would've been the points on offer at Reading and then the scum at home the weekend after, and b) as suggested above that Rafa did pick an under strength team and silly formation, with the intention of increasing the possibility of losing in that game as some sort of ridiculous statement that the current squad wasn't good enough.
Are we really supposed to believe that?
Let's be clear here, he picked a side to win that game, as a manager would do. Only when it went wrong, largely because of him, he decided that resting our best players for the next game was more important, because (I think) he's brainwashed people into his fatuous rotation, big squad way of thinking that this needed to be done to beat a poor Marseille team days later.
In retrospect what it did do was destroy any momentum we had in the league, and also belief. What it told me was we had a manger who decided that it wasn't worth fighting for 3 points with everything he had available on the day.
That might be the truth, it may not, but it's my interpretation, and nothing that Rafa has done since has made me change my opinion.
It wasn't good enough then, and it still isn't now.
And I await improvement.
Comment
-
Agree with every word.Originally posted by CharlieMansonsSquint View PostSacrifice?
Hah.
See, this is the kind of risible, laughable even, justification for those events.
It's totally based on the supposition that a)Marseille was the most important game of the season - it wasn't to me and most other reds, that would've been the points on offer at Reading and then the scum at home the weekend after, and b) as suggested above that Rafa did pick an under strength team and silly formation, with the intention of increasing the possibility of losing in that game as some sort of ridiculous statement that the current squad wasn't good enough.
Are we really supposed to believe that?
Let's be clear here, he picked a side to win that game, as a manager would do. Only when it went wrong, largely because of him, he decided that resting our best players for the next game was more important, because (I think) he's brainwashed people into his fatuous rotation, big squad way of thinking that this needed to be done to beat a poor Marseille team days later.
In retrospect what it did do was destroy any momentum we had in the league, and also belief. What it told me was we had a manger who decided that it wasn't worth fighting for 3 points with everything he had available on the day.
That might be the truth, it may not, but it's my interpretation, and nothing that Rafa has done since has made me change my opinion.
It wasn't good enough then, and it still isn't now.
And I await improvement.
The notion that Rafa went into Reading with any intention other than winning is laughable.
If he was openly happy to 'sacrifice' that game for the benefit of Marseille, Gerrard, Torres, Carra, Reina & Masher etc wouldnt have started...
Comment
-
The size of the squad won't matter when you have very few key players that must be fit or you will struggle.Originally posted by DJS View PostYes, but we're not Everton on our first european campaign for 30 years here....
We're seasoned CL campaigners and with the size of squad we have, winning at Reading and then in Marseille 4 days later shouldnt be considered a tricky 'mission'...Just believe and you never know what will happen.
According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.
Comment
-
Two of those games were Against H+W,No????I could be wrong.Originally posted by AFII View PostDJS, you do know that Kuyt hasn't played that much the last two months compared to the start of the season? He was even benched three games in a row if I remember things right.
So Rafa isn't favourising him.
Comment

Comment