Originally posted by The Erectile Banana
View Post
The team is playing terribly away from home, but Rafa's team did too in the first season. Personally I think the performances under Roy have so far been about the same as those in Rafa's first season. A big difference though is that the team and squad Roy has is much better than the one Rafa started with.
Roy has also signed some very poor players (Konch was not good enough for Fulham, and I think we all knew Poulsen was not good enough), although Rafa did too. Raul was also a very perceptive purchase.
I voted unfair, because I think many people on this site do not take a balanced view. Rafa is seen as all good, and Roy all bad. The evidence simply does not back that up.
Having said that - and despite the fact that Fulham played some much better stuff than us last season - my feeeling is that he is not the answer.





from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a 

Comment