Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stoke City vs Liverpool FC post match thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by MrMichael View Post
    Carra was obviously instrumental in that team and in that entire European campaign.

    "I don't really see why such a poor footballer is regarded as a such a legend"

    670 odd games for the club, arguably the best defender in Europe for several seasons, and you don't get why he's a club legend? I fully agree that his time is running out fast, and his deficiencies as a player have become more obvious as he's hit the wrong side of 30, but there is no need at all to diminish the role he has played for us over the last decade +


    I see no reason for denigrating his achievements of the past.

    Carra has made two mistakes in the past two games which have lead to goals. However, I think he has earned the right to play himself back to form.

    Having said that I think this is the first time he is playing in side with more emphasis on attack than defense. Under Rafa he was the lynchpin of a great defensive unit. But he also had a lot of protection. We did go gung ho in a number of games in the second half of 2009 but we also did concede a lot more then.

    Under Kenny we swarm forward with a lot more emphasis on attack than defense. We are trying to impose our passing game on others, which in my opinion is the right way to go about if we want to win the PL. I have a feeling such a system along with age will expose Carra a lot more. We may need to buy a pace ball playing CB soon.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
      In fairness, i think you're actually wrong factually - Clattenburg was taken off the refereeing lists for some questionable irregularities in his finances.
      You are right, he was only suspended for one match after the Everton-LFC game. He got an eight-month suspension following investigation into his personal life and business debt. Still a ****ing bent cunt.

      Comment


        Looking at the hightlights, what was Henderson even TRYING with his one-on-one? A fecking backpass? It was crappy tame effort straight at the ****ing goalkeeper.

        Comment


          Kenny's hurting. Only a couple of games into a new season and the gloves are off.

          Seems a tad early to really form any sort of opinion really, not enough games to prove a pattern, but Kenny has gone early with this, a pre-emptive strike maybe, just to put the refs on alert that he's watching them.
          Last edited by Vermilion; 10-09-11, 11:45 PM.

          Comment


            Refs are out to get us!
            Nobody said that.

            Furious Dalglish claims Liverpool are being victimised
            No he doesnt.

            By Mark Ryan
            Is a ****.


            Kenny Dalglish rocked football by claiming that referees have been victimising Liverpool in their decisions this season.
            He didnt claim that.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
              Nobody said that.

              No he doesnt.

              Is a ****.




              He didnt claim that.
              He's making a pretty clear point though...as to how he feels about the refereeing so far.
              'If we keep playing like that, we'll be OK, but if we keep getting battered by things outside our control and jurisdiction that's different,' he said after yesterday's defeat.

              'Our first four games have had contentious decisions and every one this season has gone against us.

              'It's important to respect referees but it's more important that referees respect my football club, the owners' football club, Liverpool football club.'

              Comment


                Perhaps the dopey journo should've used the word 'implied' rather than 'claimed'.

                Some of the stuff in that joke article, are FACTUALLY incorrect. Great 'journalism'

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                  Perhaps the dopey journo should've used the word 'implied' rather than 'claimed'.

                  Some of the stuff in that joke article, are FACTUALLY incorrect. Great 'journalism'
                  They'll always look to sensationalise what people say.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Vermilion View Post
                    He's making a pretty clear point though...as to how he feels about the refereeing so far.
                    Of course he is, why shouldn't he?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by pondus View Post
                      Of course he is, why shouldn't he?
                      Don't know, why should'nt he ? Every other manager does it..

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Vermilion View Post
                        They'll always look to sensationalise what people say.
                        Some ****e papers do that, not all.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Vermilion View Post
                          Don't know, why should'nt he ? Every other manager does it..
                          Don't know, why sho'uldnt he ?

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                            Some ****e papers do that, not all.
                            Well see what some of the others make of it.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by pondus View Post
                              Don't know, why sho'uldnt he ?
                              He sho'uld.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X