Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Evra accuses Suarez of racism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts



    Toast

    by Roy Henderson // 21 December 2011 // 1 Comment

    WE ALL have our little patterns in life.

    Me? I make a slice of toast. I butter it and spread on some strawberry jam. Before I set it on the plate, I take a bite out of the corner. I don’t even know I’m doing it.

    That’s one of my little patterns. I suspect it’s a result of having to mark my breakfast table territory as a nipper – take a bite, they’ll know it’s ‘taken’, you know? But even when I’m in the kitchen on my own, I still do it. It’s a little mental sub-routine that runs subconsciously without my even thinking about it.

    But now I’m married, and naturally the old lady hates it. I’ll make us toast and next thing I’ve taken a chunk out of hers. She’s seldom happy when that happens. But until recently, unless I was laden with lurgy, she’d sigh and munch what remained of it. But no more – she’s taken a stand.

    So being a modern broad-minded fella, I’m trying to change this wee habit for the greater good. To jolt myself out of it (and this doesn’t always work mind) I have to say to myself before it pops out of the toaster “right, she’s gonna go mental if I get this wrong – don’t take a bite this time – just leave it”. And then I sometimes leave it. But sometimes the sub-routine still kicks in, and hey presto, two bits of toast, sat on our plates, corners missing.

    And she goes appropriately mental. She’s not a morning person.

    They’re stubborn you see, these little patterns.

    But maybe if she keeps it up, I’ll:

    1. think twice about taking those bites.
    2. develop the kind of aversion that kicks in, remembers the pain of the resulting ballache, and prevents me taking those bites
    3. eventually just deliver each slice as God intended as a matter of routine.

    Voila. Bon appetit.

    It’s just the same with football clubs. (Bear with me here.) In fact, it’s the same whatever the size of the organism, or the organisation, or the governing body, or whatever it is. We have our little routines we go through without really thinking about them. There’s a trigger, and off it goes – we all sleepwalk through them step by step. We make assumptions on behalf of our counterparties in life, and even when other people’s assumptions take a chunk out of our collective toast, we harumph a little and we put up with it. That’s life – we just get on with it.

    But sometimes we don’t. We make like my old lady and we deliver some ballache to the biters in return. But first we have to muster the right level of resentment and guts – that takes time.

    So Rafa Benitez sees his instructions ignored on the touchline and waves his hands as the ball hits the back of the net to say ‘ah whatever, you know better than me’, and hey presto, the quirky and delicious little organism that is the British football establishment takes a chunk out of Liverpool Football Club’s toast in the process. The club are outraged. There’s token defiance. But ultimately they sigh and eat what remains.

    Alex Ferguson alleges that Fernando Torres is a diving cheat. Hey presto, the establishment takes another chunk out of another slice of Liverpool Football Club’s toast. Only this time, Liverpool’s manager, himself part and parcel of said establishment, picks up the slice and licks off the jam in the process, singularly failing to stand up for his player, and throwing in the fear that Manchester United might decide to buy him in the next transfer window. A few crumbs remain on the plate, and the club and all its constituent parts – the players and fans anyway, begin to experience acute pie rage. We want our toast, and we want it real bad.

    Hodgson out – he’s toast. The fanbase devour him with a little nutella – it’s a special occasion after all.

    Steven Gerrard can’t play for England cos he’s not fit to play. Capello says that if Liverpool want their toast intact, they’ll have to send Gerrard down to the team hotel to collect it. But the club’s made a New Year’s Resolution this year. Kenny’s at the helm and there are new owners talking the talk, and ostensibly walking the walk, so it’s not gonna let its loved ones put up with half-assed toast anymore. The club quietly reminds the establishment that it’s not happy. The establishment harumphs a bit.

    Wayne Rooney violently kicks a Johnny Foreigner in open play. UEFA, enacting their own little pattern, applies the textbook ban. The FA has another pattern that kicks in on these occasions. The Alan Shearer kicks to the face occasions. The FA appeals. They want their toast, jam, and whipped cream on top, served on a silver platter. And hey presto, they get it.

    But Liverpool’s made a Resolution, so Kenny pipes up and reminds them all: so how is it any different for you? From now on, we’re having the exact same, and if we don’t get it, you’re gonna be hearing from us.

    And so we arrive where we are now.

    We expected our toast and jam intact, but the FA has served up the proverbial **** sandwich. That’s not what we ordered. And we tried to tell them what would happen if they did that. Not in so many words, mind, but we gave them ample warning.

    It matters not a jot how this ends up legally – the cogs and gears of due process will kick in – each with their own agendas and little unconscious patterns – and eventually we’ll arrive at a result. But they’ll all know at the end of this that Liverpool FC won’t sit back and accept being ****ed with any more.

    There’s value in that that goes far beyond the details of the case in question. Ferguson, over two or more decades, has made it clear that when breakfast time comes, he wants ‘the usual’. The FA scampers up the stairs to his bedroom, with his paper neatly folded and some nicely heated slippers to slip his toastie little toes into. It’s what he’s come to expect after all. Imagine the ballache if they failed to deliver! It’s not even worth thinking about, etc.

    Give it time and get behind the club. Who knows, maybe one day we’ll be getting brekky in bed. But here’s hoping it’s not matron from the FA – it’ll be Salma Hayek after we’ve binned the old dears off.

    Bon appetit!
    Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

    Comment


      Originally posted by GTi View Post
      Lawyer on the radio just said that the content of LFC's statement will almost certainly lead to the club being charged with bringing the game into disrepute. You couldnt make this up.
      That would just dig the hole even deeper for the FA. I personally believe if pursued to the fullest, the FA could find themselves having to wipe the ban and clear him of all racism charges. Whether Liverpool can be bothered with the time, money and effort is another matter. Maybe some threats to take it further and pressure on the FA to justify the punishment would be enough to get it reduced to 4 games.

      My worry is that they will no doubt slam him with the maximum possible punishment for his gesture to the fulham fans.
      YNWA

      Comment


        Originally posted by destinydude View Post
        I think he is a pretty strong human being
        But what happends when it starts to affect his familiy. Some ****bags are bound to take it out on his wife.
        Blank

        Comment


          Grrr.
          3rd place. Worst champions ever.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Darkon View Post
            What good would that bring us exactly? Will do us more harm than good, and I'm certain we would get banned for a number of years further if we did.

            We can only take this through the legal system, if we can do anything at all. Other than that it's the fans protesting that will be heard!
            its only the rage which suggested it not me!

            Comment


              Ive been thinking about this a lot, and mainly about what I think the FA should have said.

              I think they had to treat this as a totally unique situation. They had to acknowledge the complexities involved in racism, they had to make a stance that though they find racism abhorrent and that it has no place in modern sport in this case the truth is somewhat complex. They should have acknowledged the multi cultural society we live in. They should have acknowledged the multi cultural nature of the modern game.

              It should then have been explained that this case hinged on a misunderstanding from 2 players from 2 different backgrounds. It should have been acknowledged through Luis' background that he was in no way a racist. It should have cited examples from Uruguay of the usage of the given word (ignoring the actual issue and word does us no favours). Then perhaps a slap on both players wrists for 'ungentlemanly' (they were both antagonising each other), and a one game ban a piece....

              Instead of this they have totally backed one player and hung the other out to dry, leaving the gutter press to brand him in bold letters a 'Racist' ruining potentially the rest of hs career and life.

              The old *******s are clearly not capable of handling a case of such nuances and we should be offering the FA a vote of no confidence. We could do with some support from elsewhere in the game - it will be interesting to see if we get any.
              Last edited by Buzzo; 21-12-11, 12:51 PM.
              Modifying post.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Buzzo View Post
                Ive been thinking about this a lot, and mainly about what I think the FA should have said.

                I think they had to treat this as a totally unique situation. They had to acknowledge the complexities involved in racism, they had to make a stance that though they find racism abhorrent and that it has no place in modern sport in this case the truth is somewhat complex. They should have acknowledged the multi cultural society we live in. They should have acknowledged the multi cultural nature of the modern game.

                It should then have been explained that this case hinged on a misunderstanding from 2 players from 2 different backgrounds. It should have been acknowledged through Luis' background that he was in no way a racist. It should have cited examples from Uruguay of the usage of the given word (ignoring the actual issue and word does us no favours). Then perhaps a slap on both players wrists for 'ungentlemanly' (they were both antagonising each other), and a one game ban a peice....

                Instead of this they have totally backed one player and hung the other out to dry, leaving the gutter press to brand him in bold letters a 'Racist' ruining potentially the rest of hs career and life.

                The old *******s are clearly not capable of handling a case of such nuances and we should be offering the FA a vote of no confidence. We could do with some support from elsewhere in the game - it will be interesting to see if we get any.
                Well said. That sums it up pretty well for me. I think Suarez' naivety has been used against him (he admitted using the term straight away) instead of a leniency and appreciation of a different upbringing. It's the sort of punishment more coherent to a fundamentalist regime rather than a modern society.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by PC Plod View Post
                  Grrr.
                  What's wrong with that?

                  Comment


                    Remember when Ian Wright accused Schmeichel of racially abusing him? FA did **** all.

                    Alex Ferguson, the Manchester United manager, yesterday denied that his goalkeeper Peter Schmeichel had racially abused the Arsenal striker Ian Wright and described the accusation as a "slur" on the club.

                    Ferguson was responding to claims by Wright in the Sun newspaper that the scuffle with the Danish international in the tunnel at the end of Wednesday's highly-charged Premiership game at Highbury had been provoked by racial abuse.

                    The pair had earlier clashed on the pitch when a two-footed lunge by Wright left Schmeichel clutching his ankle.

                    "We can categorically deny any racist remark whatsoever from Peter Schmeichel, I can assure you of that," Ferguson told Sky Sport. "There is no question of that, so it's very disappointing to read that. He's very upset. He's got a family to think about too, his family back in Denmark reading all this."

                    Ferguson considers the accusation as a "slur" on the reputation of United, who are a "worldwide institution". He pointed out that the club frequently spread the football message overseas.

                    "Two years ago we were coaching in the townships of South Africa," he said. "And Peter was part of that. We have supporters everywhere in the world. We place great store in our reputation, so it's a big slur on us"

                    Schmeichel's reputation is already under threat from the possibility of criminal charges relating to alleged racist abuse arising from an incident with Wright when the teams met in the Premiership at Old Trafford in November.

                    Ferguson's defence of his keeper was echoed by Arsene Wenger's assertion that Wright's tackle on Schmeichel did not rate in his top 30 worst tackles this season. The Arsenal manager insisted that it was the media and public's reaction that was over the top and not the striker's attempt to win the ball from the keeper.

                    "I have seen many tackles and punches that have not been judged or seen by the referee and nobody talks about them," he said. "I can show you 30 worse tackles since the beginning of the season in the Premier League that nobody spoke about.

                    "Is it a foul or is it the personalities of the two people involved, or is it the game? I think there is a little bit of all of that, more than the foul."

                    As the clamour for the Association to charge Wright grew, Wenger added: "I think it looked worse than it was. Maybe it was so spectacular because he jumped high but he touched the ball with two feet. I think it was a foul but I am really surprised [at the fuss] because the referee has made his decision. I am surprise that people still speak about that."

                    Wright has denied that he deliberately went over the ball. "I admit I lunged in, but I landed on the ball, not the man," he said. "The referee did not book me and there was no intent to hurt anyone."

                    Of the tunnel scuffle, Wright said: "I wouldn't have reacted like that if it was an ordinary insult. It was racial and completely out of order."

                    Wenger attempted to defuse the situation by suggesting a novel way of ending the feud.

                    "I think it will be good to bring this to an end because I think so much has been created from such a small thing," he said. "Maybe they will meet before the next game and sort this out, and kill each other!"

                    Ruud Gullit, Chelsea's dreadlocked manager, also resorted to humour when he disclosed how he keeps his temper when insulted on the pitch.

                    "If someone calls me a black so-and-so, I don't take it as a racist thing because I am black!" said Gullit, whose team play Manchester United in another vital title game at Stamford Bridge today. "Take it as a compliment, it means they are probably afraid of you."

                    As one of the most gifted players of his generation, the Dutchman with a Surinam background was confronted by all kinds of abuse from opponents desperate to unsettle him.

                    "The key is that there is emotion in the game and if someone is red, you'll call them a red whatsoever," he said.

                    "The best thing always for every player, wherever he comes from, is to just try to play well and play your own game and then all these things vanish.

                    "If people are swearing at me that means they are afraid of me. That gives me a sort of superiority over them."

                    However, he draws the line at organised racism. "When Ajax played in Hungary the crowd made jungle sounds all the time when the black players had the ball. That is abusive," he said.

                    "That had nothing to do with the football game, it had nothing to do with emotions, it wasn't funny."
                    Last edited by Shaggy; 21-12-11, 12:57 PM.
                    Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Maxiedge View Post
                      Well said. That sums it up pretty well for me. I think Suarez' naivety has been used against him (he admitted using the term straight away) instead of a leniency and appreciation of a different upbringing. It's the sort of punishment more coherent to a fundamentalist regime rather than a modern society.
                      +1

                      this is the FA though... not a modern society

                      maybe a european super league is not such a bad idea anymore if it means the FA wont be involved

                      Comment


                        wtf is that toast post all about - christ on toast
                        i own everton fans on the internet....that's what i do

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Chrono View Post
                          What's wrong with that?
                          Nowt mate, agree with it completely. Just still brimming with anger.
                          3rd place. Worst champions ever.

                          Comment


                            What evidence do they have? Is it a uruguayin newspapers report? Our lawyers will take this all the way to CAS if needed

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by rcasemore View Post
                              "The FA's strong stance was welcomed by Kick It Out, its chair, Lord Herman Ouseley, saying: "The FA has shown leadership and intent through what has clearly been a difficult and complex complaint to deal with, and invested time and expertise to ensure this outcome. It has demonstrated that it will not stand for discrimination, something organisations such as Fifa and Uefa should take heed of. Kick It Out will continue to work with clubs and players, at professional and grassroots level, offering education on what is deemed offensive and unacceptable behaviour."
                              And yet again he's not charged because of discrimination but because of general behavior.

                              It is total bull****. They know it, we know it, the whole ****in' world knows it and there is nothing we can do about it.

                              Shame on them.

                              I truly feel for Luis.

                              He doesn't deserve this type of spotlight.
                              Member #1 of the Luis Suarez fan club

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Buzzo View Post
                                Ive been thinking about this a lot, and mainly about what I think the FA should have said.

                                I think they had to treat this as a totally unique situation. They had to acknowledge the complexities involved in racism, they had to make a stance that though they find racism abhorrent and that it has no place in modern sport in this case the truth is somewhat complex. They should have acknowledged the multi cultural society we live in. They should have acknowledged the multi cultural nature of the modern game.

                                It should then have been explained that this case hinged on a misunderstanding from 2 players from 2 different backgrounds. It should have been acknowledged through Luis' background that he was in no way a racist. It should have cited examples from Uruguay of the usage of the given word (ignoring the actual issue and word does us no favours). Then perhaps a slap on both players wrists for 'ungentlemanly' (they were both antagonising each other), and a one game ban a piece....

                                Instead of this they have totally backed one player and hung the other out to dry, leaving the gutter press to brand him in bold letters a 'Racist' ruining potentially the rest of hs career and life.

                                The old *******s are clearly not capable of handling a case of such nuances and we should be offering the FA a vote of no confidence. We could do with some support from elsewhere in the game - it will be interesting to see if we get any.
                                Great post. However that requires the FA to be competent.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X