Dejan Lovren

[frank the tank]

Each to their own I guess

https://twitter.com/redheadlfc/statu...68024412905472

He says "Respect Lost".

Who gives a **** what a footballer thinks. As long as he can play football, genuinely who gives a ****.

[Scratch]

My world is fine..I don't understand why folk don't want total freedom of speech..censorship is erosion of liberty.. that's why I'm mad..Banning has never been the answer.. debate and discussion..proof question denial etc.. surely that is the base ..

sad that you all are happy with someone telling you what to think/put in your body etc ..without questioning it..

Quick question..does 'total freedom of speech' also include those who preach hatred and incite violence against others (be it religion, sexuality, racist)? Or is there a point at which you would draw the line?

[ChesterDave]

Surely it depends on who ultimately owns the platform and what their agenda is. Yes I am 'moist' for freedom because authoritarianism is a real possibility..and as you can see I worry about that..

Woever ultimately owns the platform can make the ultimate decision. If that is not Icke then he needs to set up the infrastructure that will allow him to do so.

I don't see how you can complain there is a lack of freedom because you are not allowed to force organisations to do things they don't want to. And quite frankly I don't see why anyone should have to host an argument that always boils down to - "it's the Jews"

[ChesterDave]

And the same law would protect you if the local news channel put it out you were a nonce regardless of the truth.

Or in a slightly less inflamatory suggestion as you are so moist for freedoms. Icke could use his own platform instead of forcing someone else to host his views against their wishes. Or does that platform not have the freedom to do that

[ChesterDave]

You can have any ****ing thought you like. Making public accusations that a specific named individual is deliberately engaging in genocide is not reasonable.

[Kenneth]

Anyone who dares disagree or challenge the official narrative are immediately dismissed as crackpot conspiracy theorists

This is false. A coherent theory with supporting evidence that stands up to at least basic scrutiny, that gets reasonable consideration. But it is true that those proposing baseless scare stories based on easily disprovable pseudo science (eg 5g and Corona virus, or air force films of ducks being aliens) or people who claim there are lizard people controlling the world are decried as crackpot conspiracy theorists , as they should be.

[Kenneth]

Well at least we'll have one centre back willing to play in June.

[rodo]

I guess that tweet is the hoax.

nope its all on his insta

[Kenneth]

Get a ****ing grip mate, in the nicest possible sense.

[Fredo]

I guess that tweet is the hoax.

[Irishnev]

Each to their own I guess

[ame="https://twitter.com/redheadlfc/status/1257268024412905472"]https://twitter.com/redheadlfc/status/1257268024412905472[/ame]

[frank the tank]

He deserves his medal as much as any more else this season.

[Buzzo]

Actually looking at some analysis which I will post on another thread, we should have had a blocker in front of Deeney for the first goal. If Lovren does any more then he gives away a pen.

The problem isn’t saying he is the best defender in the club, but the relish, the desperation with which some want to jump on the back of his performances. He deserves his medal as much as any more else this season.

[frank the tank]

Is Kenneth Dom, with a VPN?

Nope. I think there's only one Dom

[Norbs]

Is Kenneth Dom, with a VPN?