Dejan Lovren

[frank the tank]

I'd say he had the ****s. Probably had a trip to Lobster Pot on Friday

[Buzzo]

[ame]https://twitter.com/anfieldwatch/status/1203372142877958145[/ame]

[Angryred]

Was hoping Milner or Henderson would snap in him half in a tackle after that!

[baitman]

Mertens wasn't it? He wasn't even watching the ball! He was looking AT Virg and backed into him!

and the cheek of him to shout for a foul when Degs supposedly did that allegedly on him for our goal...

A snidy ****, but a very good player.

[Myo]

Mertens wasn't it? He wasn't even watching the ball! He was looking AT Virg and backed into him!

and the cheek of him to shout for a foul when Degs supposedly did that allegedly on him for our goal...

[baitman]

haha true

It's the way he knows he's not going to win the header so he decides to charge into Van Dijk instead. It's plain as sight in slow motion.

While virge is in mid jump the attacker steps into his legs so that he cannot land straight down and whe he lands all his weight comes down on one leg and its not directly underneath him so it looks like its pulled a muscle or joint slightly.

Not an obvious foul, but one of those sneaky snidey ones that cuntish teams must surely practice.

[Maxiedge]

Especially with all the other soft fouls the **** ref gave all night

haha true

It's the way he knows he's not going to win the header so he decides to charge into Van Dijk instead. It's plain as sight in slow motion.

[gratziani]

The Napoli player made no effort to play the ball, he just 'played' Virg instead, a bit soft but definitely one that could have very easily been given.

Especially with all the other soft fouls the **** ref gave all night

[Jas]

Was it a foul on VVD? I couldn’t see it tbh.

The Napoli player made no effort to play the ball, he just 'played' Virg instead, a bit soft but definitely one that could have very easily been given.

[Roboklopp]

Was it a foul on VVD? I couldn’t see it tbh.

[Maxiedge]

They're just looking to twist the knife in at any opportunity as we've had a few decisions go our way recently. It was a clear foul on VVD but let's not dwell on that or show the proper replay.

[Scratch]

Tbf I thought Wio was defending Deggsy and said it was the normal gamble a defender with less pace would make.

"A defender with less pace" and then went on to say that he wouldn't have, cos he's a speed machine...his analysis of their goal was wrong, in my opinion, there was no blame to apportion anywhere, apart from at the ref and the Napoli player that took Virg out the game.

[Roboklopp]

Tbf I thought Wio was defending Deggsy and said it was the normal gamble a defender with less pace would make.

[Buzzo]

I would dig out the Rio analysis and see if he has a point, but I couldn't give a flying **** what Rio Ferdinand thinks about anything so won't.

Yeah, all he did was explain why the goal happened but he also apportioned blame. It was bollocks.

Every goal is avoidable when looked at by a pundit in a studio.

[Kenneth]

Rio was talking absolute bollocks......after-the-fact analysis that the likes of himself and Carra have specialised in within the punditry circle.
Perhaps he was under the impression that Dejan had the speed of a juiced up Usain Bolt not only to cover the run, but also cover the area vacated by a CB on the deck.
Of course, 'that's what I'd have done Rio' has some weird recollection of his own ability to suggest that.

Lovren made a percentage call of a bad situation and only for Robbo being slightly the wrong side, it would have been the right one.

No problem with him tonight. Good performance all round, important goal etc

I would dig out the Rio analysis and see if he has a point, but I couldn't give a flying **** what Rio Ferdinand thinks about anything so won't.